Lancashire Holdings Limited

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, MDBPF has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while MDBPF trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas MDBPF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDBPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is less volatile compared to MDBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, TRRSF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while TRRSF trades at $27.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas TRRSF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRRSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is more volatile compared to TRRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, PSKRF has a market cap of 947.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while PSKRF trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas PSKRF's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSKRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is more volatile compared to PSKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, FACO has a market cap of 128.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while FACO trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas FACO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FACO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is more volatile compared to FACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, ACMTA has a market cap of 40.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while ACMTA trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas ACMTA's P/E ratio is 66.04. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACMTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is more volatile compared to ACMTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, ACMT has a market cap of 40.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while ACMT trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas ACMT's P/E ratio is 63.46. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is less volatile compared to ACMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, PPHI has a market cap of 24.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while PPHI trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas PPHI's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is more volatile compared to PPHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, PMIR has a market cap of 518610.00. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while PMIR trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas PMIR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMIR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is less volatile compared to PMIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, MMMM has a market cap of 43487.00. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while MMMM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas MMMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMMM's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is more volatile compared to MMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, TGIC has a market cap of 4235.00. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while TGIC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas TGIC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGIC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is less volatile compared to TGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, RQIHF has a market cap of 3735.00. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while RQIHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas RQIHF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RQIHF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is less volatile compared to RQIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.

LCSHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCSHF stands at 1.83B. In comparison, FPLF has a market cap of 3394.00. Regarding current trading prices, LCSHF is priced at $7.59, while FPLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCSHF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.84, whereas FPLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LCSHF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FPLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCSHF is less volatile compared to FPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCSHF.