Brompton Lifeco Split Corp.
Brompton Lifeco Split Corp. LCS.TO Peers
See (LCS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
LCS.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 199.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while BLK.NE trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 131.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while BAM.TO trades at $80.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 41.90. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 123.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while BN.TO trades at $82.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 190.91. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VFV.TO trades at $145.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 17.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZSP.TO trades at $89.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while PHYS.TO trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 13.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XIU.TO trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XEF.TO trades at $41.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VUN.TO trades at $109.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while IGM.TO trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZCN.TO trades at $34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZEA.TO trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 8.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XIC.TO trades at $40.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XUS.TO trades at $50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VCN.TO trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XSP.TO trades at $60.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while PSLV.TO trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CEF.TO trades at $40.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ONEX.TO trades at $105.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XEQT.TO trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VEQT.TO trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VGRO.TO trades at $37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CASH.TO trades at $50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CSAV.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VIU.TO trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZEB.TO trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZMMK.TO trades at $49.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while PSA.TO trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CIX.TO trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZLB.TO trades at $50.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while HXS.TO trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VSP.TO trades at $94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZCS.TO trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while HXT.TO trades at $67.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VDY.TO trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VBAL.TO trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XUU.TO trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while QUU.TO trades at $235.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XSEM.TO trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XQQ.TO trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZUE.TO trades at $80.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZWB.TO trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XGRO.TO trades at $30.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while BBUC.TO trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while TPU.TO trades at $46.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while TPE.TO trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XAW.TO trades at $45.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while TTP.TO trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XBB.TO trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VEE.TO trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VXC.TO trades at $64.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while NSCE.TO trades at $47.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VCE.TO trades at $56.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XDIV.TO trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XCB.TO trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZQQ.TO trades at $144.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while PFMN.TO trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XEC.TO trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VGG.TO trades at $93.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CMR.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XBAL.TO trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while MNY.TO trades at $100.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while HSAV.TO trades at $114.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while QCN.TO trades at $155.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XIN.TO trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZLU.TO trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZWU.TO trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XEI.TO trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XDV.TO trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CACB.TO trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ISIF.TO trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while QQC.TO trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XFH.TO trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XFN.TO trades at $61.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CYB.TO trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while CBIL.TO trades at $50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XSH.TO trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZWC.TO trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while FIH-U.TO trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XGB.TO trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZPR.TO trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while UNC.TO trades at $126.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while EQL.TO trades at $37.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZEM.TO trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZGB.TO trades at $45.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while RIIN.TO trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while HXCN.TO trades at $42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VSB.TO trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while HMAX.TO trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZUQ.TO trades at $86.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XWD.TO trades at $96.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while MUB.TO trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while HHL.TO trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while XEG.TO trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while FCUV.TO trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZDV.TO trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while VUS.TO trades at $101.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while ZDM.TO trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
LCS.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
LCS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCS.TO stands at 64.12M. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LCS.TO is priced at $8.63, while BND.TO trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.71, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCS.TO's ROE is +0.91%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCS.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCS.TO.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCS.TO | $8.63 | +2.13% | 64.12M | 7.71 | $1.12 | +9.69% |
| BLK.NE | $25.07 | +3.42% | 199.82B | 22.79 | $1.10 | N/A |
| BAM.TO | $80.45 | +2.43% | 131.72B | 41.90 | $1.92 | +3.81% |
| BN.TO | $82.09 | +3.96% | 123.01B | 190.91 | $0.43 | +0.79% |
| VFV.TO | $145.08 | +3.71% | 21.37B | 25.25 | $5.75 | +1.06% |
| ZSP.TO | $89.45 | +3.71% | 17.25B | N/A | N/A | +0.95% |
| PHYS.TO | $34.55 | -2.48% | 16.09B | 5.86 | $5.90 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | $38.89 | +0.88% | 13.70B | 20.94 | $1.86 | +3.30% |
| XEF.TO | $41.93 | +0.91% | 11.05B | 16.42 | $2.55 | +2.49% |
| VUN.TO | $109.17 | +3.73% | 11.01B | 24.66 | $4.43 | +0.98% |