Kuaishou Technology
Kuaishou Technology (KUASF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KUASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUASF | $9.50 | +1.60% | 41.1B | 19.39 | $0.49 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $67.85 | -3.17% | 616.2B | 23.80 | $2.85 | +0.86% |
| TCTZF | $66.82 | -3.15% | 606.9B | 23.36 | $2.86 | +0.85% |
| PROSY | $11.25 | -1.49% | 129.4B | 10.90 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $58.64 | +0.00% | 128.2B | 11.36 | $5.16 | +0.19% |
| NAPRF | $314.15 | +0.00% | 50.9B | 10.44 | $30.10 | +0.21% |
| NPSNY | $60.27 | -2.33% | 48.8B | 10.00 | $6.02 | +0.23% |
| KSHTY | $1.80 | +0.00% | 39.6B | 18.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 30.9B | 8.66 | $1.27 | N/A |
| YAHOF | $3.73 | +6.88% | 25.8B | 26.65 | $0.14 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
KUASF vs TCEHY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 616.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while TCEHY trades at $67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check TCEHY's competition here
KUASF vs TCTZF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 606.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while TCTZF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check TCTZF's competition here
KUASF vs PROSY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while PROSY trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check PROSY's competition here
KUASF vs PROSF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while PROSF trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check PROSF's competition here
KUASF vs NAPRF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while NAPRF trades at $314.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check NAPRF's competition here
KUASF vs NPSNY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while NPSNY trades at $60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check NPSNY's competition here
KUASF vs KSHTY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while KSHTY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check KSHTY's competition here
KUASF vs BAIDF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while BAIDF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check BAIDF's competition here
KUASF vs YAHOF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check YAHOF's competition here
KUASF vs RPGRF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RPGRF trades at $153.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RPGRF's competition here
KUASF vs RPGRY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RPGRY trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RPGRY's competition here
KUASF vs NHNCF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check NHNCF's competition here
KUASF vs ADEVF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ADEVF's competition here
KUASF vs ADEVY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ADEVY's competition here
KUASF vs ATDRF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ATDRF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ATDRF's competition here
KUASF vs ATDRY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ATDRY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ATDRY's competition here
KUASF vs CSXXY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while CSXXY trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check CSXXY's competition here
KUASF vs RTMVY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RTMVY trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RTMVY's competition here
KUASF vs RTMVF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RTMVF's competition here
KUASF vs SKLTF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SKLTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 198.13. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SKLTF's competition here
KUASF vs KKKUF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while KKKUF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check KKKUF's competition here
KUASF vs CHLLF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check CHLLF's competition here
KUASF vs OOOOF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check OOOOF's competition here
KUASF vs MEIUF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MEIUF's competition here
KUASF vs HMNTY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while HMNTY trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check HMNTY's competition here
KUASF vs DHGAF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check DHGAF's competition here
KUASF vs MLRYY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MLRYY's competition here
KUASF vs XINXF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check XINXF's competition here
KUASF vs ADBMF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ADBMF's competition here
KUASF vs WNWSF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check WNWSF's competition here
KUASF vs ZGXNF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ZGXNF's competition here
KUASF vs FRRGF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check FRRGF's competition here
KUASF vs VYGPF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check VYGPF's competition here
KUASF vs MECVF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MECVF's competition here
KUASF vs NXCLF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while NXCLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check NXCLF's competition here
KUASF vs UUMMF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check UUMMF's competition here
KUASF vs OPNDF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while OPNDF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check OPNDF's competition here
KUASF vs TGRVF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check TGRVF's competition here
KUASF vs HYPPF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while HYPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check HYPPF's competition here
KUASF vs ZMDTF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ZMDTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ZMDTF's competition here
KUASF vs CKPDY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check CKPDY's competition here
KUASF vs RSTN Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RSTN's competition here
KUASF vs CPADF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check CPADF's competition here
KUASF vs MSEZ Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MSEZ's competition here
KUASF vs PXSTF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check PXSTF's competition here
KUASF vs BBUZ Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while BBUZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check BBUZ's competition here
KUASF vs SABOF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SABOF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SABOF's competition here
KUASF vs RDLYF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RDLYF's competition here
KUASF vs PRSNF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while PRSNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check PRSNF's competition here
KUASF vs NIROF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while NIROF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check NIROF's competition here
KUASF vs EGLXF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while EGLXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check EGLXF's competition here
KUASF vs GIFX Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while GIFX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check GIFX's competition here
KUASF vs BMTM Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check BMTM's competition here
KUASF vs BBTVF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check BBTVF's competition here
KUASF vs SFUNY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SFUNY's competition here
KUASF vs YOOIF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while YOOIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check YOOIF's competition here
KUASF vs NUGL Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check NUGL's competition here
KUASF vs FMHS Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while FMHS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check FMHS's competition here
KUASF vs CRTDW Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check CRTDW's competition here
KUASF vs LBUY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check LBUY's competition here
KUASF vs MRNJ Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MRNJ's competition here
KUASF vs MRPT Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MRPT's competition here
KUASF vs QQQFF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check QQQFF's competition here
KUASF vs GOGY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check GOGY's competition here
KUASF vs LTCP Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check LTCP's competition here
KUASF vs APMLF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 924.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check APMLF's competition here
KUASF vs SPFYF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 657.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SPFYF's competition here
KUASF vs CYAP Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check CYAP's competition here
KUASF vs ILIM Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ILIM's competition here
KUASF vs VMSI Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check VMSI's competition here
KUASF vs RBDC Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RBDC's competition here
KUASF vs DGTHF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check DGTHF's competition here
KUASF vs LKST Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check LKST's competition here
KUASF vs SEEK Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SEEK's competition here
KUASF vs KIWB Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check KIWB's competition here
KUASF vs QTTOY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 78.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while QTTOY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check QTTOY's competition here
KUASF vs ZONX Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ZONX's competition here
KUASF vs OTTV Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check OTTV's competition here
KUASF vs LHGI Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check LHGI's competition here
KUASF vs SLNM Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SLNM's competition here
KUASF vs RWRDP Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RWRDP's competition here
KUASF vs HUTN Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check HUTN's competition here
KUASF vs DELCF Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check DELCF's competition here
KUASF vs REDFY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check REDFY's competition here
KUASF vs BTIM Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check BTIM's competition here
KUASF vs PIKL Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check PIKL's competition here
KUASF vs ISHM Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ISHM's competition here
KUASF vs SHGY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check SHGY's competition here
KUASF vs MDAW Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check MDAW's competition here
KUASF vs LOCM Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check LOCM's competition here
KUASF vs ROII Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ROII's competition here
KUASF vs DATI Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check DATI's competition here
KUASF vs LOVLQ Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check LOVLQ's competition here
KUASF vs ZZLL Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ZZLL's competition here
KUASF vs FRFR Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check FRFR's competition here
KUASF vs INTH Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check INTH's competition here
KUASF vs ABBY Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check ABBY's competition here
KUASF vs RAIO Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check RAIO's competition here
KUASF vs YITD Comparison August 2025
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 41.1B. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $9.50, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.Check YITD's competition here