Kuaishou Technology
Kuaishou Technology KUASF Peers
See (KUASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUASF | $8.12 | +14.93% | 35B | 16.92 | $0.48 | N/A |
| TCTZF | $63.01 | +0.00% | 601.1B | 23.20 | $2.85 | +0.87% |
| TCEHY | $63.79 | +0.00% | 580.3B | 22.31 | $2.85 | +0.91% |
| PROSY | $10.93 | +0.28% | 123.5B | 10.62 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $55.25 | -0.81% | 120.8B | 10.71 | $5.16 | +0.20% |
| NPSNY | $61.63 | +0.00% | 50B | 10.24 | $6.02 | +0.15% |
| NAPRF | $306.70 | +0.00% | 49.7B | 10.19 | $30.09 | +0.21% |
| KSHTY | $1.51 | +0.00% | 32.9B | 15.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $10.66 | +0.09% | 29.9B | 8.46 | $1.26 | N/A |
| YAHOF | $3.73 | +0.00% | 26.6B | 26.64 | $0.14 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
KUASF vs TCTZF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 601.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while TCTZF trades at $63.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs TCEHY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 580.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while TCEHY trades at $63.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs PROSY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while PROSY trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs PROSF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while PROSF trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs NPSNY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while NPSNY trades at $61.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs NAPRF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while NAPRF trades at $306.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and NAPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs KSHTY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while KSHTY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and KSHTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs BAIDF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while BAIDF trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs YAHOF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RPGRY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RPGRY trades at $39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs RPGRF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and RPGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs NHNCF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and NHNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ADEVF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ADEVY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ATDRF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ATDRF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ATDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ATDRY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ATDRY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs CSXXY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while CSXXY trades at $45.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RTMVF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RTMVY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RTMVY trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs SKLTF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SKLTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs KKKUF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while KKKUF trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and KKKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs CHLLF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and CHLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs OOOOF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and OOOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs MEIUF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MEIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs HMNTY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while HMNTY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and HMNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs DHGAF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and DHGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs MLRYY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs XINXF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ADBMF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs WNWSF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and WNWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ZGXNF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ZGXNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs FRRGF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs VYGPF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and VYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs MECVF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs UUMMF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs OPNDF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and OPNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs TGRVF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs NXCLF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ZMDTF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ZMDTF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs CKPDY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and CKPDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RSTN Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs CPADF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and CPADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs MSEZ Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs BBUZ Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while BBUZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs PXSTF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and PXSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RDLYF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs SABOF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SABOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -35.44. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs PRSNF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs NIROF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and NIROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs BMTM Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and BMTM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs HYPPF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and HYPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs BBTVF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs EGLXF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs NUGL Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs SFUNY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SFUNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs CRTDW Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs YOOIF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while YOOIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs GIFX Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while GIFX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs LBUY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs MRNJ Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MRNJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs QQQFF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs MRPT Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MRPT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs GOGY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs LTCP Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs APMLF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 941.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs SPFYF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 636.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SPFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs CYAP Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs FMHS Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 591.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while FMHS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and FMHS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs QTTOY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 532.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while QTTOY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ILIM Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ILIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs VMSI Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RBDC Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and RBDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs DGTHF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and DGTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs LKST Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and LKST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs SEEK Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SEEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs KIWB Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and KIWB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ZONX Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ZONX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs OTTV Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs LHGI Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs SLNM Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SLNM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RWRDP Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and RWRDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs HUTN Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs DELCF Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and DELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs REDFY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs BTIM Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and BTIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs PIKL Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ISHM Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs SHGY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs MDAW Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs LOCM Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ROII Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs DATI Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and DATI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs LOVLQ Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs ZZLL Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUASF.
KUASF vs FRFR Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and FRFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs INTH Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs ABBY Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and ABBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs RAIO Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and RAIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KUASF vs YITD Comparison
KUASF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUASF stands at 35B. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, KUASF is priced at $8.12, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUASF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.92, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUASF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUASF and YITD have similar daily volatility (0.00).