Kits Eyecare Ltd.

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 397.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BABAF trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BABAF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MPNGF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MPNGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MPNGY trades at $20.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MPNGY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while NCLTY trades at $10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check NCLTY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ANCTF trades at $61.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ANCTF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JDCMF trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JDCMF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check XXLLY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while YAHOY trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check YAHOY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HKTGF trades at $287.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HKTGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while NCLTF trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check NCLTF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while RKUNF trades at $5.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check RKUNF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while RKUNY trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check RKUNY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MTTRY trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MTTRY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DUFRY trades at $6.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 66.12. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DUFRY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ALEGF trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ALEGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DFRYF trades at $61.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 59.92. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DFRYF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SNROF trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SNROF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ELPQF trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ELPQF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ZLDSF trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ZLDSF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DLVHF trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DLVHF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while PETRY trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check PETRY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SATLF trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SATLF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while CDNAF trades at $133.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check CDNAF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MONOF trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MONOF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DELHY trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DELHY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MONOY trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MONOY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JBHIF trades at $60.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JBHIF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SRTTY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SRTTY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ZLNDY trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ZLNDY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while CDNTF trades at $157.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check CDNTF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JDSPY trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JDSPY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JDDSF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JDDSF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while TKAYF trades at $24.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check TKAYF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JTKWY trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JTKWY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MCARY trades at $11.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MCARY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JUMSY trades at $29.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JUMSY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SDIPF trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SDIPF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ZLPSF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check JUMSF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DROOF trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is -244.25. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DROOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DROOF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ZOPLY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HNORY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HNORY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DNLMY trades at $13.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DNLMY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MTAGF trades at $5.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 557.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MTAGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MRCIF trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MRCIF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DSITF trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DSITF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while YMDAF trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check YMDAF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while GPGNF trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check GPGNF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MGLUY trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MGLUY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BTOOY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while FHNGY trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check FHNGY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MIZUF trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MIZUF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while LEFUF trades at $20.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check LEFUF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while PAHGF trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check PAHGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while WHTPF trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is -29.82. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check WHTPF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MKRMF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check GRUPF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 995.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check FNXTF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SCCAF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, DTCB has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while DTCB trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas DTCB's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTCB's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to DTCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check DTCB's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HWGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWGC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HWGC's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 594.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while THGPF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check THGPF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 475.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ASOMF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ASOMF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BHOOY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -102.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BHOOY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ASOMY trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ASOMY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 420.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HLFDY trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HLFDY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BHHOF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -100.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BHHOF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 403.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HLFDF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HLFDF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SSILF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SSILF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while THGHY trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check THGHY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while CRFCF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check CRFCF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check NBRNF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HMAGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SAXJY trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check SAXJY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while KGGNF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check KGGNF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BJURF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BJURF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BNNNF trades at $13.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BNNNF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while WCRS trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check WCRS's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while HKTVY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check HKTVY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check RDBBY's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check AHAHF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while YUMSF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check YUMSF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while IGDFF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check IGDFF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while RDBBF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check RDBBF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check MHCRF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KTYCF has daily volatility of 1.47 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPGZ's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ADBGF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ACEHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ACEHF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while PXHI trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is less volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check PXHI's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check IDGBF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check ARTZF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while GLHD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check GLHD's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check CNVAF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check TWRKF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while FDIT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDIT's ROE of +6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check FDIT's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while GMELF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check GMELF's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while RLAB trades at $12.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check RLAB's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while BWTL trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.61. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWTL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check BWTL's competition here

KTYCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KTYCF stands at 434.9M. In comparison, PSPX has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTYCF is priced at $13.50, while PSPX trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KTYCF currently has a P/E ratio of 112.75, whereas PSPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTYCF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSPX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTYCF is more volatile compared to PSPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTYCF.Check PSPX's competition here