Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
Kurita Water Industries Ltd. KTWIF Peers
See (KTWIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
KTWIF vs VLTO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 23.72B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while VLTO trades at $95.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs AQUA Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ZWS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 5.85B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ZWS trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs FSS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while FSS trades at $87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs KTWIY Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while KTWIY trades at $67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and KTWIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MMNNF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MMNNF trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ATMU Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ATMU trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ORGJF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs UMICF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while UMICF trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and UMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs UMICY Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while UMICY trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs CCVTF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while CCVTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and CCVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PCTTU Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PCTTU trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs PCT Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PCT trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs HIZOF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while HIZOF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs CECO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 894.39M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while CECO trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ERII Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 853.10M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ERII trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs TKUMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 723.53M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and TKUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MTWTF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and MTWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PVARF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 423.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PVARF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs CECE Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 400.99M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs GRPRF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 307.64M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GRPRF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PCTTW Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 251.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PCTTW trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ARQ Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 173.92M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ARQ trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs AKCCF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 158.07M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while AKCCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ACTHF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.38M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ACTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ADES Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs MEEC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.11M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEEC's ROE of +16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SCWO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 43.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SCWO trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs EMFGF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 42.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while EMFGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SSHPF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SREMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 33.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SREMF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs CLIR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while CLIR trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs FTEK Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 29.54M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while FTEK trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs BHTG Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SCAXF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 25.26M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SCAXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs YEWTF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.13M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs PGTK Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 23.56M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PGTK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs BIRMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 20.98M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while BIRMF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and BIRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs TOMZ Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while TOMZ trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs LIQT Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 13.98M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while LIQT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs TMGEF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 13.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while TMGEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ZONE Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 11.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ZONE trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs GRNWF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs INTWF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 9.59M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while INTWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and INTWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs CLWT Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while CLWT trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs QUTIF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 6.88M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while QUTIF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and QUTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs BNET Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while BNET trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNET's ROE of +3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DNDDF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs QWTR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while QWTR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DEVS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 5.90M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while DEVS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs AETLF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and AETLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs COSLF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.83M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DRFS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.93M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and DRFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MGON Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs KNOS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 3.01M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DCTIF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while DCTIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ENPRF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs GOGR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GOGR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs MKUL Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs RAINW Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while RAINW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DOCKF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 1.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while DOCKF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and DOCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs OWUV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs EAWD Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 901679.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EAWD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs RAKR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 628764.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while RAKR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and RAKR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ATMFF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 527959.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ATMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs LQWC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 482358.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ATGVF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 472650.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs TGTMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 463000.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SFBE Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427149.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFBE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SFBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GWTR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 332021.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs TNKE Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265934.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to TNKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs EESH Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 110797.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while EESH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs XLPI Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 86265.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and XLPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PCTL Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80560.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and PCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs WTII Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 77017.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and WTII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ESFS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75086.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SPECW Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71552.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs MSBN Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53168.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs GLEC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 49990.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GLEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs AKMYF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35252.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs ETII Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26205.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ETII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs WTNW Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24267.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and WTNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SPEC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20402.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SPEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SINX Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 18953.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs GCHK Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16136.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SYEV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 15984.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SYEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs UVFT Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13416.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and UVFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PURA Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11414.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SMVS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8523.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SMVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GRCO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8291.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GRCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs CGYV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6210.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGYV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and CGYV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ROBXF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5605.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs GMEV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 5411.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GMEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs EMHI Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4017.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EMHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs RENO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and RENO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs EAUI Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2858.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EAUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EAUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MPML Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and MPML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs HTHL Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs FQCC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs AERC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, AERC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs NEWA Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 3.78B. In comparison, NEWA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $33.65, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.17, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLTO | $95.69 | +0.17% | 23.72B | 27.34 | $3.50 | +0.42% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.10B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ZWS | $34.75 | -0.63% | 5.85B | 39.49 | $0.88 | +0.97% |
| FSS | $87.34 | +0.88% | 5.33B | 24.95 | $3.50 | +0.57% |
| KTWIY | $67.99 | +0.65% | 3.82B | 17.34 | $3.92 | N/A |
| KTWIF | $33.65 | N/A | 3.78B | 17.17 | $1.96 | +1.86% |
| MMNNF | $19.49 | -0.56% | 3.56B | 35.44 | $0.55 | +0.33% |
| ATMU | $36.28 | +0.50% | 3.00B | 16.34 | $2.22 | +0.41% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +25.16% | 2.44B | 16.57 | $3.20 | +1.86% |
| UMICF | $9.44 | -3.72% | 2.27B | -1.36 | -$6.96 | +5.71% |