Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
Kurita Water Industries Ltd. KTWIF Peers
See (KTWIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTWIF | $39.71 | -0.01% | 4.4B | 31.85 | $1.24 | +1.58% |
| KTWIY | $78.57 | +6.08% | 4.6B | 32.92 | $2.47 | N/A |
| UMICY | $4.16 | +9.19% | 3.9B | -2.29 | -$1.78 | +3.59% |
| UMICF | $15.62 | +5.19% | 3.8B | -2.19 | -$7.13 | +3.59% |
| MMNNF | $16.50 | +16.53% | 3B | 30.56 | $0.54 | +0.50% |
| CCVTF | $1.17 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 7.31 | $0.16 | +0.46% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 13.41 | $3.16 | +2.33% |
| HIZOF | $6.72 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 7.24 | $0.91 | +0.02% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | +0.00% | 701.5M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +2.16% |
| MTWTF | $12.31 | -0.04% | 671.2M | 17.09 | $0.90 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
KTWIF vs KTWIY Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while KTWIY trades at $78.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs UMICY Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while UMICY trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs UMICF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while UMICF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to UMICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs MMNNF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while MMNNF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and MMNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs CCVTF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while CCVTF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and CCVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ORGJF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ORGJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs HIZOF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while HIZOF trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and HIZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs TKUMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and TKUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MTWTF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while MTWTF trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and MTWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GRPRF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GRPRF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PVARF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while PVARF trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and PVARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ACTHF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ACTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SREMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SREMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs MEEC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEEC's ROE of -36.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs SSHPF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SSHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs EMFGF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while EMFGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EMFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs BIRMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while BIRMF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs YEWTF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs AKCCF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while AKCCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs TMGEF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while TMGEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and TMGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ENPRF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ENPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs EESH Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while EESH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EESH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EESH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs INTWF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, INTWF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while INTWF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas INTWF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTWF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to INTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DNDDF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and DNDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs BNET Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while BNET trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and BNET have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GRNWF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GRNWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GRNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs QUTIF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while QUTIF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and QUTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs AETLF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and AETLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs COSLF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and COSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs RAKR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while RAKR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs DCTIF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while DCTIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and DCTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GOGR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GOGR trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs QWTR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while QWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and QWTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs DRFS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DRFS's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and DRFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SCAXF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SCAXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SCAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs KNOS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and KNOS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs DOCKF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while DOCKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and DOCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MGON Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while MGON trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs OWUV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs EAWD Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 614.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EAWD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ATMFF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 528K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ATMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ATMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs TGTMF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 467.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and TGTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs LQWC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 434.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and LQWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SFBE Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFBE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SFBE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ATGVF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 404.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ATGVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ATGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GMEV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GMEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs TNKE Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and TNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GWTR Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 251.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GWTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PCTL Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and PCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs WTII Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 77K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and WTII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ESFS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ESFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MSBN Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and MSBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GLEC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GLEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs AKMYF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTWIF.
KTWIF vs XLPI Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and XLPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ETII Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ETII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PGTK Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while PGTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGTK's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and PGTK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs WTNW Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and WTNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SINX Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SINX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GCHK Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs UVFT Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and UVFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs PURA Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and PURA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SMVS Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SMVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs GRCO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and GRCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs CGYV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and CGYV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs ROBXF Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and ROBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs SYEV Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 5.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and SYEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs EMHI Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EMHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs RENO Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and RENO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs EAUI Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and EAUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs HTHL Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 229. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and HTHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs MPML Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and MPML have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KTWIF vs FQCC Comparison
KTWIF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTWIF stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, KTWIF is priced at $39.71, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTWIF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.85, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTWIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTWIF and FQCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).