Kontoor Brands, Inc.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB Peers
See (KTB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTB | $67.60 | -4.13% | 3.8B | 16.60 | $4.07 | +3.74% |
| RL | $286.99 | -0.99% | 17.4B | 24.73 | $11.61 | +1.47% |
| LEVI | $21.95 | +11.25% | 8.7B | 24.37 | $0.90 | +2.92% |
| GIL | $51.05 | -0.51% | 7.7B | 20.02 | $2.55 | +2.09% |
| VFC | $12.33 | -4.60% | 4.8B | 68.53 | $0.18 | +3.63% |
| PVH | $73.49 | -1.09% | 3.5B | 10.37 | $7.09 | +0.25% |
| COLM | $61.45 | -3.33% | 3.4B | 15.91 | $3.86 | +1.95% |
| UAA | $6.85 | -3.25% | 2.9B | -14.57 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UA | $6.42 | -3.39% | 2.8B | -13.65 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| ZGN | $8.87 | -2.74% | 2.2B | 25.37 | $0.35 | +1.52% |
Stock Comparison
KTB vs RL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while RL trades at $286.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs LEVI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while LEVI trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs GIL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while GIL trades at $51.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs VFC Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while VFC trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 68.53. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs PVH Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while PVH trades at $73.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs COLM Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while COLM trades at $61.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs UAA Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while UAA trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs UA Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while UA trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs ZGN Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while ZGN trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs AIN Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while AIN trades at $69.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs HBI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while HBI trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs GOOS Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while GOOS trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs GIII Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while GIII trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs FIGS Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 973.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while FIGS trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 599.00. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs OXM Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 700.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while OXM trades at $46.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs SGC Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while SGC trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs LAKE Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while LAKE trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs UFI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while UFI trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs CULP Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while CULP trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs NCI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while NCI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs JRSH Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while JRSH trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -47.29. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs JL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while JL trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs VNCE Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while VNCE trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs LLL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs PMNT Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while PMNT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs DXYN Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while DXYN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs JXJT Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs DLA Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs XELB Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while XELB trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs SQBG Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs KBSF Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs EVK Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $67.60, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.60, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.59%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.