Kontoor Brands, Inc.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. KTB Peers
See (KTB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTB | $72.69 | +6.05% | 4.04B | 17.86 | $4.07 | +2.79% |
| RL | $264.62 | +6.38% | 16.34B | 24.14 | $10.96 | +1.25% |
| GIL | $48.41 | +2.52% | 7.32B | 18.98 | $2.55 | +1.74% |
| LEVI | $17.73 | +3.02% | 7.01B | 19.70 | $0.90 | +2.93% |
| VFC | $14.43 | +8.66% | 5.62B | -39.00 | -$0.37 | +2.51% |
| PVH | $78.93 | +6.02% | 4.15B | 7.47 | $10.56 | +0.19% |
| COLM | $69.59 | +5.31% | 3.81B | 18.03 | $3.86 | +1.73% |
| UAA | $6.22 | +6.42% | 2.61B | -21.43 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| UA | $5.90 | +5.73% | 2.60B | -20.34 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| ZGN | $8.54 | +3.52% | 2.16B | 25.12 | $0.34 | +1.36% |
Stock Comparison
KTB vs RL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 16.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while RL trades at $264.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs GIL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.32B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while GIL trades at $48.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs LEVI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 7.01B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while LEVI trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs VFC Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while VFC trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs PVH Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while PVH trades at $78.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs COLM Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while COLM trades at $69.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs UAA Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while UAA trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -21.43. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs UA Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while UA trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs ZGN Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while ZGN trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs AIN Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while AIN trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs HBI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while HBI trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HBI's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs GIII Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while GIII trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs GOOS Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 874.64M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while GOOS trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs OXM Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 865.59M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while OXM trades at $58.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs FIGS Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 746.92M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while FIGS trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 229.75. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs LAKE Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 168.92M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while LAKE trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs SGC Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 166.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while SGC trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs UFI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 86.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while UFI trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs CULP Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 52.07M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while CULP trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs JRSH Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 41.93M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while JRSH trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs VNCE Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 21.96M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while VNCE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs PMNT Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 14.33M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while PMNT trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs JL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 11.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while JL trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs LLL Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.77M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs DXYN Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 10.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while DXYN trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs NCI Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 7.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while NCI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NCI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs XELB Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while XELB trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs JXJT Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.90M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.
KTB vs DLA Comparison
KTB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KTB stands at 4.04B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KTB is priced at $72.69, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KTB currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KTB's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KTB is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KTB.