Karoon Energy Ltd
Karoon Energy Ltd (KRNGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRNGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRNGF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 916.5M | 7.81 | $0.16 | +4.92% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $14.61 | -14.81% | 27.7B | 7.81 | $1.87 | +8.38% |
| PEXNY | $9.46 | -3.07% | 18.8B | 9.10 | $1.04 | +5.59% |
| TRMLF | $45.69 | +1.20% | 17.6B | 18.47 | $2.47 | +4.25% |
| IPXHY | $14.38 | +2.54% | 17.2B | 5.94 | $2.42 | +3.73% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| SSLZY | $5.22 | +2.35% | 16.8B | 13.63 | $0.38 | +1.71% |
| STOSF | $5.02 | -1.57% | 16.3B | 13.21 | $0.38 | +4.67% |
| IPXHF | $13.50 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 5.58 | $2.42 | +4.19% |
Stock Comparison
KRNGF vs NSTKF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check NSTKF's competition here
KRNGF vs WOPEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while WOPEF trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check WOPEF's competition here
KRNGF vs PEXNY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PEXNY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PEXNY's competition here
KRNGF vs TRMLF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while TRMLF trades at $45.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check TRMLF's competition here
KRNGF vs IPXHY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while IPXHY trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check IPXHY's competition here
KRNGF vs DETNF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check DETNF's competition here
KRNGF vs SSLZY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while SSLZY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check SSLZY's competition here
KRNGF vs STOSF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while STOSF trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check STOSF's competition here
KRNGF vs IPXHF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while IPXHF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check IPXHF's competition here
KRNGF vs RGRLF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while RGRLF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check RGRLF's competition here
KRNGF vs AETUF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while AETUF trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check AETUF's competition here
KRNGF vs NOVKY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check NOVKY's competition here
KRNGF vs SPGYF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check SPGYF's competition here
KRNGF vs PTRRY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PTRRY trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PTRRY's competition here
KRNGF vs DKDRF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while DKDRF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check DKDRF's competition here
KRNGF vs MEGEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while MEGEF trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check MEGEF's competition here
KRNGF vs VSOGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check VSOGF's competition here
KRNGF vs PREKF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PREKF trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PREKF's competition here
KRNGF vs DELKY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while DELKY trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check DELKY's competition here
KRNGF vs DLKGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while DLKGF trades at $213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check DLKGF's competition here
KRNGF vs PMOIF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PMOIF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PMOIF's competition here
KRNGF vs HBRIY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while HBRIY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check HBRIY's competition here
KRNGF vs OASPW Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check OASPW's competition here
KRNGF vs PEYUF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PEYUF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PEYUF's competition here
KRNGF vs EFVIF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check EFVIF's competition here
KRNGF vs EERGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while EERGF trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check EERGF's competition here
KRNGF vs PRMRF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PRMRF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PRMRF's competition here
KRNGF vs BTEGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check BTEGF's competition here
KRNGF vs BEPTF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while BEPTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check BEPTF's competition here
KRNGF vs ATHOF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ATHOF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ATHOF's competition here
KRNGF vs NUVSF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while NUVSF trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check NUVSF's competition here
KRNGF vs PTGIF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PTGIF's competition here
KRNGF vs BCHEY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check BCHEY's competition here
KRNGF vs IPCFF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while IPCFF trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check IPCFF's competition here
KRNGF vs MEYYY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check MEYYY's competition here
KRNGF vs JPTXF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check JPTXF's competition here
KRNGF vs FRHLF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while FRHLF trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check FRHLF's competition here
KRNGF vs BIREF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while BIREF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check BIREF's competition here
KRNGF vs AAVVF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while AAVVF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -62.44. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check AAVVF's competition here
KRNGF vs CDDRF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CDDRF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CDDRF's competition here
KRNGF vs DTNOF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while DTNOF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check DTNOF's competition here
KRNGF vs CRCQW Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CRCQW's competition here
KRNGF vs WLLAW Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check WLLAW's competition here
KRNGF vs PARXF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PARXF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PARXF's competition here
KRNGF vs KELTF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while KELTF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check KELTF's competition here
KRNGF vs SQZZF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 923.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while SQZZF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check SQZZF's competition here
KRNGF vs UNEGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check UNEGF's competition here
KRNGF vs AOIFF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 878.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while AOIFF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check AOIFF's competition here
KRNGF vs CRLFF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 867.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CRLFF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CRLFF's competition here
KRNGF vs CWEGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CWEGF's competition here
KRNGF vs BWEFF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check BWEFF's competition here
KRNGF vs DALXF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 704.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while DALXF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check DALXF's competition here
KRNGF vs KWTEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while KWTEF trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check KWTEF's competition here
KRNGF vs RCKHF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 637.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while RCKHF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check RCKHF's competition here
KRNGF vs AAGEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check AAGEF's competition here
KRNGF vs ZPTAF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 549.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ZPTAF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ZPTAF's competition here
KRNGF vs GFKSY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check GFKSY's competition here
KRNGF vs PTALF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PTALF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PTALF's competition here
KRNGF vs GUKYF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 466.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while GUKYF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 71.67. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check GUKYF's competition here
KRNGF vs KRNGY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 459.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while KRNGY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check KRNGY's competition here
KRNGF vs SHASF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 437.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while SHASF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check SHASF's competition here
KRNGF vs COPJF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while COPJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check COPJF's competition here
KRNGF vs TBNRF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check TBNRF's competition here
KRNGF vs BKBEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check BKBEF's competition here
KRNGF vs ATUUF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ATUUF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -41.36. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ATUUF's competition here
KRNGF vs PTHRF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PTHRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -29.96. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PTHRF's competition here
KRNGF vs PRYGF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PRYGF's competition here
KRNGF vs PEGIY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PEGIY's competition here
KRNGF vs OILSF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while OILSF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check OILSF's competition here
KRNGF vs ENQUF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ENQUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ENQUF's competition here
KRNGF vs CEIEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CEIEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CEIEF's competition here
KRNGF vs FECCF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 318.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while FECCF trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check FECCF's competition here
KRNGF vs TUWLF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while TUWLF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check TUWLF's competition here
KRNGF vs PESAF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PESAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PESAF's competition here
KRNGF vs EXCE Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while EXCE trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check EXCE's competition here
KRNGF vs GEGYF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while GEGYF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check GEGYF's competition here
KRNGF vs TUWOY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while TUWOY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check TUWOY's competition here
KRNGF vs ZNOG Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ZNOG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ZNOG's competition here
KRNGF vs IPOOF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while IPOOF trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check IPOOF's competition here
KRNGF vs HZNFF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check HZNFF's competition here
KRNGF vs ITEEF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ITEEF's competition here
KRNGF vs CRNZF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CRNZF's competition here
KRNGF vs PSHIF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PSHIF's competition here
KRNGF vs PIFYF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PIFYF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PIFYF's competition here
KRNGF vs EEGUF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check EEGUF's competition here
KRNGF vs HRCXF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check HRCXF's competition here
KRNGF vs SEUSF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 179.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while SEUSF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check SEUSF's competition here
KRNGF vs GASXF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 175.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while GASXF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check GASXF's competition here
KRNGF vs RECWF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check RECWF's competition here
KRNGF vs GEGYY Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check GEGYY's competition here
KRNGF vs ALVOF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while ALVOF trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check ALVOF's competition here
KRNGF vs PNWRF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PNWRF's competition here
KRNGF vs KGEIF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check KGEIF's competition here
KRNGF vs SVNNF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 154.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check SVNNF's competition here
KRNGF vs LNDNF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check LNDNF's competition here
KRNGF vs RUBLF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 143.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while RUBLF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check RUBLF's competition here
KRNGF vs CVONF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is less volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check CVONF's competition here
KRNGF vs PTRUF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while PTRUF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 107.30. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check PTRUF's competition here
KRNGF vs HMENF Comparison July 2025
KRNGF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRNGF stands at 916.5M. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRNGF is priced at $1.25, while HMENF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRNGF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.81, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, KRNGF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KRNGF is more volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRNGF.Check HMENF's competition here