Kore Potash plc
Kore Potash plc KP2.L Peers
See (KP2.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KP2.L | $3.35 | +11.67% | 161.93M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHP.L | $1,895.50 | +3.75% | 96.19B | 11.28 | $1.68 | +4.95% |
| 0L5V.L | $357.51 | +1.56% | 89.59B | 51.91 | $6.89 | +0.82% |
| RIO.L | $4,662.00 | +3.68% | 76.64B | 8.80 | $5.30 | +6.65% |
| 0R2J.L | $149.66 | -7.03% | 75.66B | 63.90 | $2.34 | +0.92% |
| 0L8B.L | $92.27 | +4.12% | 74.19B | 20.87 | $4.42 | +2.91% |
| 0IFA.L | $254.04 | +0.44% | 72.02B | 66.14 | $3.84 | +0.96% |
| 0HBH.L | $275.10 | +1.30% | 61.22B | 27.40 | $10.04 | +2.57% |
| 0Z4C.L | $231.20 | -2.78% | 32.77B | 35.01 | $6.60 | +1.68% |
| GLEN.L | $267.65 | +6.08% | 32.16B | -26.76 | -$0.10 | +2.20% |
Stock Comparison
KP2.L vs BHP.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 96.19B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while BHP.L trades at $1,895.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 89.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0L5V.L trades at $357.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 51.91. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs RIO.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 76.64B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while RIO.L trades at $4,662.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 75.66B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R2J.L trades at $149.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 63.90. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 74.19B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0L8B.L trades at $92.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 72.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0IFA.L trades at $254.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 66.14. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 61.22B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0HBH.L trades at $275.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.77B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0Z4C.L trades at $231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 32.16B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while GLEN.L trades at $267.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -26.76. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 27.86B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0K9L.L trades at $120.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 27.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0NHS.L trades at $55.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 26.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0KEI.L trades at $116.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs AAL.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 26.23B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while AAL.L trades at $2,162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 19.65B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0EDD.L trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 15.58B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0UGS.L trades at $37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -88.85. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 14.07B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0HQU.L trades at $83.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 11.66B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R07.L trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.30B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0KXS.L trades at $171.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 11.00B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0LVK.L trades at $85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0K3B.L trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0IF3.L trades at $82.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0LJ9.L trades at $41.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0HCB.L trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0HC7.L trades at $62.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 7.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0U6C.L trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs S32.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while S32.L trades at $138.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -34.65. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0HUR.L trades at $55.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0QYN.L trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 5.05B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R0U.L trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -71.65. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0IK3.L trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VBE.L trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -144.69. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0AHJ.L trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VL5.L trades at $44.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0I0H.L trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VGM.L trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 55.21. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0L45.L trades at $56.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R0A.L trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 167.71. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VGE.L trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0TWH.L trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KP2.L has daily volatility of 10.53 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
KP2.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VOA.L trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0QYM.L trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VHI.L trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0KW8.L trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0HWG.L trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0NZN.L trades at $819.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R2C.L trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R11.L trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0QZ2.L trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 678.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ADT1.L trades at $196.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 677.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0G5B.L trades at $121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 520.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0O6D.L trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 446.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0KD1.L trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -38.22. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 397.73M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0JZT.L trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 385.94M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VIK.L trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs KMR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 360.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while KMR.L trades at $408.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs GFM.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 317.90M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while GFM.L trades at $172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 221.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0UYN.L trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 214.58M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while SOLG.L trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs SVML.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 203.79M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while SVML.L trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 195.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R20.L trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 167.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0P07.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs BSE.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.47M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while BSE.L trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 147.77M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0RRC.L trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 144.33M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ECOR.L trades at $58.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs TRR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.44M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while TRR.L trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 138.89M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while CAPD.L trades at $70.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 136.15M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0V46.L trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 119.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0VNO.L trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs JLP.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 109.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while JLP.L trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs PRE.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 101.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while PRE.L trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 98.94M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while CUSN.L trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs SAV.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 97.77M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while SAV.L trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0UIK.L trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs RBW.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 72.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while RBW.L trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs KOD.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 70.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while KOD.L trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 67.06M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0IYS.L trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.91M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0R0D.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 64.19M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0QQR.L trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 61.65M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0QVG.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs MKA.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 54.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while MKA.L trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs HE1.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 53.59M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while HE1.L trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while AFRK.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ATM.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 50.99M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ATM.L trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ALL.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 46.44M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ALL.L trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0ICI.L trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.92M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0UYO.L trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs FAR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 37.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while FAR.L trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is less volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 36.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0QPH.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs FOX.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 30.64M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while FOX.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs NMT.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while NMT.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 28.47M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ZNWD.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ARS.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 27.68M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ARS.L trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 25.98M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 1SN.L trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs KAV.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 24.39M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while KAV.L trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs EMH.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while EMH.L trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs GSP.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.52M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while GSP.L trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs ARCM.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, ARCM.L has a market cap of 20.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while ARCM.L trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCM.L's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARCM.L's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to ARCM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs 0V7X.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while 0V7X.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.
KP2.L vs RMR.L Comparison
KP2.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KP2.L stands at 161.93M. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 17.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KP2.L is priced at $3.35, while RMR.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KP2.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KP2.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KP2.L is more volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KP2.L.