Konami Group Corporation

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, 0Q0C.L has a market cap of 2.57T. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while 0Q0C.L trades at $4,595.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas 0Q0C.L's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0Q0C.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KNM.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 0Q0C.L has daily volatility of N/A.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, 0GDU.L has a market cap of 19.21B. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while 0GDU.L trades at $181.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas 0GDU.L's P/E ratio is 56.65. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0GDU.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to 0GDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, KWS.L has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while KWS.L trades at $2,446.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas KWS.L's P/E ratio is -101.92. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWS.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L and KWS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, TM17.L has a market cap of 380.15M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while TM17.L trades at $264.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas TM17.L's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TM17.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to TM17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, EVPL.L has a market cap of 377.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while EVPL.L trades at $262.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas EVPL.L's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVPL.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to EVPL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, DEVO.L has a market cap of 96.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while DEVO.L trades at $20.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas DEVO.L's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DEVO.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to DEVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, FDEV.L has a market cap of 72.60M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while FDEV.L trades at $188.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas FDEV.L's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FDEV.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to FDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, TBLS.L has a market cap of 24.58M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while TBLS.L trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas TBLS.L's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TBLS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to TBLS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, TBLD.L has a market cap of 20.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while TBLD.L trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas TBLD.L's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TBLD.L's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L is less volatile compared to TBLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KNM.L.

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, BIDS.L has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while BIDS.L trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas BIDS.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIDS.L's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L and BIDS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KNM.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KNM.L stands at 2.82T. In comparison, STK.L has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, KNM.L is priced at $20,820.00, while STK.L trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.23, whereas STK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KNM.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KNM.L and STK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).