The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc.
The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc. KMFI Peers
See (KMFI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMFI | $0.03 | -25.00% | 197266.00 | N/A | -$315.20 | N/A |
| HRSHF | $3.25 | +2.69% | 33.55B | 11.21 | $0.29 | +3.47% |
| HSHCY | $12.32 | -1.56% | 30.93B | 10.71 | $1.15 | +3.59% |
| QIHCF | $1.95 | +22.64% | 30.03B | 6.72 | $0.29 | +5.90% |
| RINIY | $12.00 | N/A | 8.44B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HWDJY | $52.56 | N/A | 7.20B | 22.56 | $2.33 | +2.07% |
| BVILY | $43.79 | +6.94% | 6.30B | 42.93 | $1.02 | +1.04% |
| HWDJF | $11.40 | +7.55% | 6.25B | 19.00 | $0.60 | +2.44% |
| HISEF | $3.10 | N/A | 4.94B | 8.86 | $0.35 | +4.83% |
| SEBYF | $82.00 | N/A | 4.48B | 17.23 | $4.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KMFI vs HRSHF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 33.55B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while HRSHF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs HSHCY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 30.93B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while HSHCY trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs QIHCF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 30.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to QIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs RINIY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while RINIY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs HWDJY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs BVILY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while BVILY trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs HWDJF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while HWDJF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs HISEF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while HISEF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs SEBYF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while SEBYF trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to SEBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs RINIF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while RINIF trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs BVILF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while BVILF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to BVILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs MAWHY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while MAWHY trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to MAWHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs ACKAY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while ACKAY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACKAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs MAWHF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while MAWHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs ELUXY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while ELUXY trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -151.33. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs ELRXF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs RHUHF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while RHUHF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to RHUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs JGLCF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.86M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs CFSKF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs RYLHF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.88M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to RYLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs VLBOF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 533.90M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to VLBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs SEBYY Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.59M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs WTWGF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 121.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while WTWGF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs VCCTF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 120.01M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while VCCTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs WKGBF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to WKGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs IPGGF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 93.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while IPGGF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs DIIBF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 41.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while DIIBF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs RGBD Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while RGBD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs DGIX Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while DGIX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs LUVU Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while LUVU trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to LUVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs ROWC Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 3985.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while ROWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROWC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to ROWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs DIAAF Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3692.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to DIAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs DEER Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3359.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while DEER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to DEER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs THBD Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1134.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while THBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to THBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs PWNX Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while PWNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs VUOC Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while VUOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to VUOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs PFWIQ Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to PFWIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs FTDL Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while FTDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is less volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.
KMFI vs AUVIQ Comparison
KMFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFI stands at 197266.00. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMFI is priced at $0.03, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMFI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFI is more volatile compared to AUVIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFI.