KMF Builders & Developers Limited
KMF Builders & Developers Limited (KMFBLDR.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMFBLDR.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMFBLDR.BO | ₹8.02 | +10.16% | 93.1M | -34.73 | -₹0.22 | N/A |
| BRRL.BO | ₹748.00 | +1.04% | 7.6B | 162.18 | ₹4.51 | N/A |
| COROENGG.BO | ₹84.00 | +3.97% | 2.9B | 102.93 | ₹0.82 | N/A |
| ALPINEHOU.BO | ₹93.00 | +3.09% | 1.6B | 30.73 | ₹3.05 | N/A |
| VAGHANI.BO | ₹233.40 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 243.13 | ₹0.96 | N/A |
| VARIMAN.BO | ₹4.98 | -2.73% | 976.8M | 45.64 | ₹0.11 | N/A |
| PRERINFRA.BO | ₹24.97 | -3.40% | 908.2M | 18.90 | ₹1.33 | N/A |
| GUJTLRM.BO | ₹0.60 | +0.00% | 835.4M | 0.08 | ₹7.90 | N/A |
| SHRISTI.BO | ₹30.00 | +7.14% | 621.6M | -9.18 | -₹3.05 | N/A |
| SISL.BO | ₹301.55 | +10.24% | 516.4M | 10.21 | ₹28.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KMFBLDR.BO vs BRRL.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, BRRL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while BRRL.BO trades at ₹748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas BRRL.BO's P/E ratio is 162.18. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRRL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to BRRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check BRRL.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs COROENGG.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, COROENGG.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while COROENGG.BO trades at ₹84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas COROENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 102.93. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COROENGG.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to COROENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check COROENGG.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs ALPINEHOU.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, ALPINEHOU.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while ALPINEHOU.BO trades at ₹93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas ALPINEHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALPINEHOU.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO and ALPINEHOU.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALPINEHOU.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs VAGHANI.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, VAGHANI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while VAGHANI.BO trades at ₹233.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas VAGHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 243.13. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VAGHANI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to VAGHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check VAGHANI.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs VARIMAN.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, VARIMAN.BO has a market cap of 976.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while VARIMAN.BO trades at ₹4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas VARIMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 45.64. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VARIMAN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to VARIMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check VARIMAN.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs PRERINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, PRERINFRA.BO has a market cap of 908.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while PRERINFRA.BO trades at ₹24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas PRERINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRERINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to PRERINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check PRERINFRA.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs GUJTLRM.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, GUJTLRM.BO has a market cap of 835.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while GUJTLRM.BO trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas GUJTLRM.BO's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GUJTLRM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to GUJTLRM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check GUJTLRM.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs SHRISTI.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, SHRISTI.BO has a market cap of 621.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while SHRISTI.BO trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas SHRISTI.BO's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHRISTI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to SHRISTI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check SHRISTI.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs SISL.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, SISL.BO has a market cap of 516.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while SISL.BO trades at ₹301.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas SISL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SISL.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO and SISL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SISL.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs MANJEERA.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, MANJEERA.BO has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while MANJEERA.BO trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas MANJEERA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MANJEERA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO and MANJEERA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MANJEERA.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs PARSHWANA.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, PARSHWANA.BO has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while PARSHWANA.BO trades at ₹76.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas PARSHWANA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.84. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PARSHWANA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to PARSHWANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check PARSHWANA.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs POPULARES.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, POPULARES.BO has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while POPULARES.BO trades at ₹15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas POPULARES.BO's P/E ratio is -261.67. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POPULARES.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to POPULARES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check POPULARES.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs LAHL.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, LAHL.BO has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while LAHL.BO trades at ₹7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas LAHL.BO's P/E ratio is -92.22. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LAHL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to LAHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check LAHL.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs ADHBHUTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, ADHBHUTIN.BO has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while ADHBHUTIN.BO trades at ₹14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas ADHBHUTIN.BO's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADHBHUTIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to ADHBHUTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check ADHBHUTIN.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs DRL.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, DRL.BO has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while DRL.BO trades at ₹20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas DRL.BO's P/E ratio is -40.36. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DRL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to DRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check DRL.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs CEMAINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, CEMAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while CEMAINFRA.BO trades at ₹5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas CEMAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEMAINFRA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to CEMAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check CEMAINFRA.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs QUANTBUILD.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, QUANTBUILD.BO has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while QUANTBUILD.BO trades at ₹4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas QUANTBUILD.BO's P/E ratio is -36.69. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QUANTBUILD.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to QUANTBUILD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check QUANTBUILD.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs SKIFL.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, SKIFL.BO has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while SKIFL.BO trades at ₹10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas SKIFL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKIFL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to SKIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check SKIFL.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs CRANEINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, CRANEINFRA.BO has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while CRANEINFRA.BO trades at ₹15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas CRANEINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRANEINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to CRANEINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check CRANEINFRA.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs EASTBUILD.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, EASTBUILD.BO has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while EASTBUILD.BO trades at ₹42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas EASTBUILD.BO's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EASTBUILD.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to EASTBUILD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check EASTBUILD.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs NYSSACORP.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, NYSSACORP.BO has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while NYSSACORP.BO trades at ₹2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas NYSSACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NYSSACORP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to NYSSACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check NYSSACORP.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs MAHESH.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, MAHESH.BO has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while MAHESH.BO trades at ₹12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas MAHESH.BO's P/E ratio is -87.86. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MAHESH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to MAHESH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check MAHESH.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs UNISHIRE.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, UNISHIRE.BO has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while UNISHIRE.BO trades at ₹1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas UNISHIRE.BO's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNISHIRE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO is less volatile compared to UNISHIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMFBLDR.BO.Check UNISHIRE.BO's competition here
KMFBLDR.BO vs ATHCON.BO Comparison February 2026
KMFBLDR.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMFBLDR.BO stands at 93.1M. In comparison, ATHCON.BO has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, KMFBLDR.BO is priced at ₹8.02, while ATHCON.BO trades at ₹4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMFBLDR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -34.73, whereas ATHCON.BO's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, KMFBLDR.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATHCON.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMFBLDR.BO and ATHCON.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATHCON.BO's competition here