Kambi Group plc
Kambi Group plc (KMBIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMBIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMBIF | $14.33 | +0.00% | 408.8M | 42.15 | $0.34 | N/A |
| PDYPY | $103.75 | +0.50% | 36.7B | -494.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPF | $205.00 | +1.98% | 36.3B | -476.74 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| ARLUF | $46.14 | +0.00% | 28.7B | 40.47 | $1.14 | +1.20% |
| GXYYY | $24.06 | -1.39% | 21B | 18.73 | $1.28 | +2.68% |
| GXYEF | $4.64 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 18.56 | $0.25 | +2.77% |
| SCHYY | $24.07 | -0.66% | 19.5B | 18.66 | $1.29 | +1.14% |
| SCHYF | $2.37 | +0.00% | 19.2B | 18.23 | $0.13 | +10.55% |
| EVVTY | $89.20 | +0.28% | 18.5B | 13.22 | $6.74 | +3.28% |
| EVGGF | $88.75 | -0.84% | 18B | 13.15 | $6.75 | +3.53% |
Stock Comparison
KMBIF vs PDYPY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PDYPY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PDYPY trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PDYPY's P/E ratio is -494.05. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDYPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to PDYPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PDYPY's competition here
KMBIF vs PDYPF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PDYPF's competition here
KMBIF vs ARLUF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ARLUF trades at $46.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to ARLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ARLUF's competition here
KMBIF vs GXYYY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GXYYY trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GXYYY's competition here
KMBIF vs GXYEF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GXYEF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GXYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GXYEF's competition here
KMBIF vs SCHYY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SCHYY trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SCHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SCHYY's competition here
KMBIF vs SCHYF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SCHYF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SCHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SCHYF's competition here
KMBIF vs EVVTY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EVVTY trades at $89.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EVVTY's competition here
KMBIF vs EVGGF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EVGGF trades at $88.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EVGGF's competition here
KMBIF vs GMVHF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GMVHF trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GMVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GMVHF's competition here
KMBIF vs GMVHY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GMVHY trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GMVHY's competition here
KMBIF vs GOFPY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GOFPY trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GOFPY's competition here
KMBIF vs MCHVF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while MCHVF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to MCHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check MCHVF's competition here
KMBIF vs GRKZF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GRKZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GRKZF trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GRKZF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRKZF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GRKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GRKZF's competition here
KMBIF vs GIGNY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GIGNY trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GIGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GIGNY's competition here
KMBIF vs LTRCF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while LTRCF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to LTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check LTRCF's competition here
KMBIF vs GIGNF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GIGNF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GIGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GIGNF's competition here
KMBIF vs LFDJF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while LFDJF trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to LFDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check LFDJF's competition here
KMBIF vs PYTCY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PYTCY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 81.82. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to PYTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PYTCY's competition here
KMBIF vs WYNMY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while WYNMY trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to WYNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check WYNMY's competition here
KMBIF vs WYNMF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while WYNMF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to WYNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check WYNMF's competition here
KMBIF vs SKXJF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SKXJF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SKXJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SKXJF's competition here
KMBIF vs BMRMF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BMRMF trades at $121.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to BMRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BMRMF's competition here
KMBIF vs GEBHY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GEBHY trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GEBHY's competition here
KMBIF vs GEBEY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to GEBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GEBEY's competition here
KMBIF vs SJMHF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SJMHF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SJMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SJMHF's competition here
KMBIF vs GEBHF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GEBHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GEBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GEBHF's competition here
KMBIF vs GMALY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GMALY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to GMALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GMALY's competition here
KMBIF vs KNDGF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to KNDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check KNDGF's competition here
KMBIF vs GMALF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GMALF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GMALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GMALF's competition here
KMBIF vs NGCRF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while NGCRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to NGCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check NGCRF's competition here
KMBIF vs SJMHY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SJMHY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SJMHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SJMHY's competition here
KMBIF vs NGCRY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while NGCRY trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to NGCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check NGCRY's competition here
KMBIF vs PYTCF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PYTCF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to PYTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PYTCF's competition here
KMBIF vs MDEVF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while MDEVF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to MDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check MDEVF's competition here
KMBIF vs BLBRF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BLBRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to BLBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BLBRF's competition here
KMBIF vs BVHBB Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to BVHBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BVHBB's competition here
KMBIF vs TABCF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while TABCF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to TABCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check TABCF's competition here
KMBIF vs TACBY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while TACBY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TACBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to TACBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check TACBY's competition here
KMBIF vs MDEVY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 929.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while MDEVY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to MDEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check MDEVY's competition here
KMBIF vs MALDF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 855.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while MALDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MALDF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to MALDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check MALDF's competition here
KMBIF vs BJSAF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to BJSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BJSAF's competition here
KMBIF vs RANKF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 796.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while RANKF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to RANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check RANKF's competition here
KMBIF vs IRLTY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to IRLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check IRLTY's competition here
KMBIF vs IRLTF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to IRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check IRLTF's competition here
KMBIF vs MCHVY Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 565.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while MCHVY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to MCHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check MCHVY's competition here
KMBIF vs SKYZF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SKYZF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SKYZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SKYZF's competition here
KMBIF vs PBKOF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 433.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PBKOF trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to PBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PBKOF's competition here
KMBIF vs EIHDF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EIHDF has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EIHDF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EIHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIHDF's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to EIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EIHDF's competition here
KMBIF vs BYNEF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BYNEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to BYNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BYNEF's competition here
KMBIF vs PDSSF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PDSSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to PDSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PDSSF's competition here
KMBIF vs EHGRF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EHGRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to EHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EHGRF's competition here
KMBIF vs AGTEF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 229.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while AGTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to AGTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check AGTEF's competition here
KMBIF vs AINSF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while AINSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check AINSF's competition here
KMBIF vs GHIFF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GHIFF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GHIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GHIFF's competition here
KMBIF vs PSDMF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PSDMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to PSDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PSDMF's competition here
KMBIF vs PBTHF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PBTHF has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PBTHF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PBTHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBTHF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to PBTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PBTHF's competition here
KMBIF vs PMKRF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to PMKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check PMKRF's competition here
KMBIF vs RCTUF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to RCTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check RCTUF's competition here
KMBIF vs ARHN Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ARHN has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ARHN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ARHN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARHN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to ARHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ARHN's competition here
KMBIF vs GLXZ Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GLXZ trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GLXZ's competition here
KMBIF vs CTTMF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to CTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check CTTMF's competition here
KMBIF vs TBTC Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while TBTC trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to TBTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check TBTC's competition here
KMBIF vs JPOTF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while JPOTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check JPOTF's competition here
KMBIF vs BRRE Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BRRE trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -740.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to BRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BRRE's competition here
KMBIF vs JKPTF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to JKPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check JKPTF's competition here
KMBIF vs TNTAF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check TNTAF's competition here
KMBIF vs SPOZF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to SPOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SPOZF's competition here
KMBIF vs NWGIW Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to NWGIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check NWGIW's competition here
KMBIF vs CETMF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while CETMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to CETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check CETMF's competition here
KMBIF vs RYWCF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to RYWCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check RYWCF's competition here
KMBIF vs RVLCF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while RVLCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to RVLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check RVLCF's competition here
KMBIF vs BRVO Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while BRVO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to BRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check BRVO's competition here
KMBIF vs LTFD Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while LTFD trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to LTFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check LTFD's competition here
KMBIF vs ITMZF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ITMZF's competition here
KMBIF vs THRSF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while THRSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check THRSF's competition here
KMBIF vs FCNE Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, FCNE has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while FCNE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas FCNE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to FCNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check FCNE's competition here
KMBIF vs RVRVF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while RVRVF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to RVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check RVRVF's competition here
KMBIF vs GMER Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GMER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMER's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GMER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GMER's competition here
KMBIF vs ELRA Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 861.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ELRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to ELRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ELRA's competition here
KMBIF vs FUNFF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 521.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check FUNFF's competition here
KMBIF vs WPFH Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 335.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while WPFH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check WPFH's competition here
KMBIF vs WNRS Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 259.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while WNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to WNRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check WNRS's competition here
KMBIF vs VETIF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 101.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while VETIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to VETIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check VETIF's competition here
KMBIF vs EXPH Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EXPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to EXPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EXPH's competition here
KMBIF vs SWCC Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 75.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while SWCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to SWCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check SWCC's competition here
KMBIF vs EMBR Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 37.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EMBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to EMBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EMBR's competition here
KMBIF vs EPGG Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while EPGG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to EPGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check EPGG's competition here
KMBIF vs LUKEF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 24.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to LUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check LUKEF's competition here
KMBIF vs NTGL Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while NTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to NTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check NTGL's competition here
KMBIF vs ELYS Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ELYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to ELYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ELYS's competition here
KMBIF vs KNBA Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while KNBA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is less volatile compared to KNBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check KNBA's competition here
KMBIF vs CGAM Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while CGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to CGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check CGAM's competition here
KMBIF vs ROBK Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ROBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to ROBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ROBK's competition here
KMBIF vs LTTGF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to LTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check LTTGF's competition here
KMBIF vs AMRA Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 32. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while AMRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to AMRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check AMRA's competition here
KMBIF vs ULSP Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 11. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while ULSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to ULSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check ULSP's competition here
KMBIF vs GIGI Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, GIGI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while GIGI trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas GIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to GIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check GIGI's competition here
KMBIF vs MLCOF Comparison August 2025
KMBIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMBIF stands at 408.8M. In comparison, MLCOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMBIF is priced at $14.33, while MLCOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMBIF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.15, whereas MLCOF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, KMBIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLCOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMBIF is more volatile compared to MLCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMBIF.Check MLCOF's competition here