Koolearn Technology Holding Limited
Koolearn Technology Holding Limited (KLTHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KLTHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLTHF | $0.47 | +0.00% | 491.8M | -2.14 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| BSEFF | $20.25 | -19.32% | 2B | 2025.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| CEGHF | $0.42 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 20.75 | $0.02 | N/A |
| COGNY | $0.45 | +4.37% | 798.1M | 4.89 | $0.09 | +2.55% |
| IDPUF | $2.50 | +0.00% | 695.8M | 11.36 | $0.22 | +4.79% |
| DTLIF | $11.60 | +0.00% | 636.6M | 22.75 | $0.51 | N/A |
| YDUQY | $1.50 | +15.89% | 471.4M | -49.83 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| RFLFF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 69.5M | -5.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| RFLFY | $0.49 | +0.00% | 34.2M | -3.28 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| UMEWF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 30.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KLTHF vs BSEFF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BSEFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while BSEFF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas BSEFF's P/E ratio is 2025.00. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BSEFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and BSEFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSEFF's competition here
KLTHF vs CEGHF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, CEGHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while CEGHF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas CEGHF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CEGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to CEGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check CEGHF's competition here
KLTHF vs COGNY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, COGNY has a market cap of 798.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while COGNY trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas COGNY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COGNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to COGNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check COGNY's competition here
KLTHF vs IDPUF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, IDPUF has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while IDPUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas IDPUF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IDPUF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to IDPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check IDPUF's competition here
KLTHF vs DTLIF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, DTLIF has a market cap of 636.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while DTLIF trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas DTLIF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DTLIF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and DTLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTLIF's competition here
KLTHF vs YDUQY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, YDUQY has a market cap of 471.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while YDUQY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas YDUQY's P/E ratio is -49.83. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to YDUQY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and YDUQY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YDUQY's competition here
KLTHF vs RFLFF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, RFLFF has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while RFLFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas RFLFF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RFLFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to RFLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check RFLFF's competition here
KLTHF vs RFLFY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, RFLFY has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while RFLFY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas RFLFY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RFLFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and RFLFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RFLFY's competition here
KLTHF vs UMEWF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, UMEWF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while UMEWF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas UMEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to UMEWF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and UMEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UMEWF's competition here
KLTHF vs ZMENY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, ZMENY has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while ZMENY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas ZMENY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ZMENY's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to ZMENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check ZMENY's competition here
KLTHF vs FHSEY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, FHSEY has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while FHSEY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas FHSEY's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FHSEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to FHSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check FHSEY's competition here
KLTHF vs EXDW Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, EXDW has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while EXDW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas EXDW's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EXDW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and EXDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXDW's competition here
KLTHF vs MBAIF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, MBAIF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while MBAIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas MBAIF's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MBAIF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and MBAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBAIF's competition here
KLTHF vs LTRE Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, LTRE has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while LTRE trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas LTRE's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LTRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to LTRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check LTRE's competition here
KLTHF vs MNMT Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, MNMT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while MNMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas MNMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MNMT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to MNMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check MNMT's competition here
KLTHF vs BRWC Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BRWC has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while BRWC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas BRWC's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BRWC's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and BRWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRWC's competition here
KLTHF vs QOEG Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, QOEG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while QOEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas QOEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to QOEG's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and QOEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QOEG's competition here
KLTHF vs BTTUF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BTTUF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while BTTUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas BTTUF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BTTUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and BTTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTTUF's competition here
KLTHF vs NAUH Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, NAUH has a market cap of 739.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while NAUH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas NAUH's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NAUH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to NAUH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check NAUH's competition here
KLTHF vs PBYA Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, PBYA has a market cap of 395.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while PBYA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas PBYA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PBYA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and PBYA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBYA's competition here
KLTHF vs VCTL Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, VCTL has a market cap of 42.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while VCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas VCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VCTL's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and VCTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCTL's competition here
KLTHF vs EDMCQ Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, EDMCQ has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while EDMCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas EDMCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EDMCQ's ROE of +38.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to EDMCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check EDMCQ's competition here
KLTHF vs CHNUF Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, CHNUF has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while CHNUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas CHNUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHNUF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to CHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check CHNUF's competition here
KLTHF vs LEAI Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, LEAI has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while LEAI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas LEAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LEAI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to LEAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check LEAI's competition here
KLTHF vs ZVOI Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, ZVOI has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while ZVOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas ZVOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ZVOI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and ZVOI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZVOI's competition here
KLTHF vs TIGE Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, TIGE has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while TIGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas TIGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TIGE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to TIGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check TIGE's competition here
KLTHF vs ESINQ Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, ESINQ has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while ESINQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas ESINQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ESINQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and ESINQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESINQ's competition here
KLTHF vs NEWYY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, NEWYY has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while NEWYY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas NEWYY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NEWYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and NEWYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWYY's competition here
KLTHF vs VRED Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, VRED has a market cap of 639. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while VRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas VRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to VRED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check VRED's competition here
KLTHF vs MMTS Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, MMTS has a market cap of 379. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while MMTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas MMTS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MMTS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and MMTS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMTS's competition here
KLTHF vs BSEFY Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, BSEFY has a market cap of 91. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while BSEFY trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas BSEFY's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BSEFY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF is less volatile compared to BSEFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLTHF.Check BSEFY's competition here
KLTHF vs CCHZ Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, CCHZ has a market cap of 62. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while CCHZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas CCHZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CCHZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and CCHZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCHZ's competition here
KLTHF vs YYYH Comparison August 2025
KLTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLTHF stands at 491.8M. In comparison, YYYH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, KLTHF is priced at $0.47, while YYYH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas YYYH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLTHF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to YYYH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLTHF and YYYH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YYYH's competition here