Koil Energy Solutions, Inc.
Koil Energy Solutions, Inc. (KLNG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KLNG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLNG | $1.41 | -1.40% | 17M | 8.81 | $0.16 | N/A |
| TNRSF | $19.01 | +0.00% | 20.4B | 11.59 | $1.64 | +4.37% |
| THNPY | $42.70 | -0.70% | 7.6B | 16.75 | $2.55 | +2.19% |
| THNPF | $41.26 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 16.18 | $2.55 | +2.34% |
| GZPZY | $38.69 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 17.35 | $2.23 | +4.24% |
| CHOLF | $0.80 | +0.00% | 6.7B | 8.00 | $0.10 | +4.03% |
| SUBCY | $19.31 | -2.87% | 5.7B | 30.17 | $0.64 | +4.47% |
| ACGYF | $18.60 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 29.06 | $0.64 | +4.83% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +5.60% |
| SAPMF | $2.65 | -6.29% | 5.2B | 13.95 | $0.19 | +7.22% |
Stock Comparison
KLNG vs TNRSF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TNRSF trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TNRSF's competition here
KLNG vs THNPY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while THNPY trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check THNPY's competition here
KLNG vs THNPF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while THNPF trades at $41.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to THNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check THNPF's competition here
KLNG vs GZPZY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while GZPZY trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check GZPZY's competition here
KLNG vs CHOLF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CHOLF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CHOLF's competition here
KLNG vs SUBCY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SUBCY trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SUBCY's competition here
KLNG vs ACGYF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ACGYF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ACGYF's competition here
KLNG vs GZPZF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check GZPZF's competition here
KLNG vs SAPMF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SAPMF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SAPMF's competition here
KLNG vs WYGPY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while WYGPY trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check WYGPY's competition here
KLNG vs WYGPF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while WYGPF trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check WYGPF's competition here
KLNG vs SBFFF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SBFFF trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SBFFF's competition here
KLNG vs SBFFY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SBFFY trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SBFFY's competition here
KLNG vs TRRVF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TRRVF trades at $122.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TRRVF's competition here
KLNG vs PRSEF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of +11.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PRSEF's competition here
KLNG vs CIMEF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CIMEF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CIMEF's competition here
KLNG vs TGSNF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TGSNF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TGSNF's competition here
KLNG vs AKRYY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while AKRYY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check AKRYY's competition here
KLNG vs AKRTF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check AKRTF's competition here
KLNG vs MDIKF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check MDIKF's competition here
KLNG vs CESDF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CESDF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CESDF's competition here
KLNG vs PGEJF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PGEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PGEJF's competition here
KLNG vs SAWLF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SAWLF's competition here
KLNG vs TOLWF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 720.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TOLWF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TOLWF's competition here
KLNG vs HNTIF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while HNTIF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check HNTIF's competition here
KLNG vs ATONF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 691.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ATONF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ATONF's competition here
KLNG vs PSYTF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 683.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PSYTF trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PSYTF's competition here
KLNG vs SBOEF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SBOEF's competition here
KLNG vs HNTIY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 481.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while HNTIY trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check HNTIY's competition here
KLNG vs ATONY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ATONY's competition here
KLNG vs SHANF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 332.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SHANF's competition here
KLNG vs AKKVF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check AKKVF's competition here
KLNG vs CGGYY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CGGYY's competition here
KLNG vs TOTZF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TOTZF trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TOTZF's competition here
KLNG vs CFWFF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CFWFF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CFWFF's competition here
KLNG vs SNVVF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SNVVF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SNVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SNVVF's competition here
KLNG vs DDHLF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to DDHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check DDHLF's competition here
KLNG vs BLYFF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to BLYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check BLYFF's competition here
KLNG vs JUTOY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while JUTOY trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check JUTOY's competition here
KLNG vs PDER Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PDER trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PDER's competition here
KLNG vs PKDC Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PKDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PKDC's competition here
KLNG vs WFTSF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check WFTSF's competition here
KLNG vs SCEYF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SCEYF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SCEYF's competition here
KLNG vs PLSDF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PLSDF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PLSDF's competition here
KLNG vs QSEP Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while QSEP trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check QSEP's competition here
KLNG vs POFCY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check POFCY's competition here
KLNG vs ETOLF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ETOLF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ETOLF's competition here
KLNG vs MCCRF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while MCCRF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check MCCRF's competition here
KLNG vs NSFDF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while NSFDF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -63.40. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check NSFDF's competition here
KLNG vs CAWLF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CAWLF's competition here
KLNG vs EEYUF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check EEYUF's competition here
KLNG vs POFCF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check POFCF's competition here
KLNG vs GWTI Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check GWTI's competition here
KLNG vs QDRSF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to QDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check QDRSF's competition here
KLNG vs ENGT Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ENGT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ENGT's competition here
KLNG vs BWTX Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check BWTX's competition here
KLNG vs WEIIF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WEIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check WEIIF's competition here
KLNG vs FOYJ Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check FOYJ's competition here
KLNG vs HGHAF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while HGHAF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check HGHAF's competition here
KLNG vs TAGP Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TAGP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TAGP's competition here
KLNG vs CGPVF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CGPVF's competition here
KLNG vs BRYFF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while BRYFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check BRYFF's competition here
KLNG vs OXFCF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to OXFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check OXFCF's competition here
KLNG vs CTNR Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CTNR trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CTNR's competition here
KLNG vs TXLZF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TXLZF's competition here
KLNG vs NWPIF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check NWPIF's competition here
KLNG vs GLFH Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check GLFH's competition here
KLNG vs SKPO Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 692.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SKPO's competition here
KLNG vs IRIG Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check IRIG's competition here
KLNG vs SMGI Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 338.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SMGI's competition here
KLNG vs FSEI Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check FSEI's competition here
KLNG vs SSOF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SSOF's competition here
KLNG vs IESCF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to IESCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check IESCF's competition here
KLNG vs PKDCW Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PKDCW's competition here
KLNG vs GPTC Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check GPTC's competition here
KLNG vs WWNG Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check WWNG's competition here
KLNG vs CPYJ Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CPYJ's competition here
KLNG vs SGUJ Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SGUJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SGUJ's competition here
KLNG vs TEGR Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TEGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TEGR's competition here
KLNG vs CSSV Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CSSV's competition here
KLNG vs AURI Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to AURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check AURI's competition here
KLNG vs RTSO Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to RTSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check RTSO's competition here
KLNG vs SUBB Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SUBB's competition here
KLNG vs LNDT Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to LNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check LNDT's competition here
KLNG vs CTBG Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CTBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CTBG's competition here
KLNG vs BMMCF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check BMMCF's competition here
KLNG vs USEI Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check USEI's competition here
KLNG vs PTOG Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check PTOG's competition here
KLNG vs AMCF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check AMCF's competition here
KLNG vs POOSF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check POOSF's competition here
KLNG vs EHYD Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to EHYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check EHYD's competition here
KLNG vs NNYR Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to NNYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check NNYR's competition here
KLNG vs ALRY Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ALRY's competition here
KLNG vs ISYX Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ISYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check ISYX's competition here
KLNG vs CDVIQ Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CDVIQ's competition here
KLNG vs CHMR Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CHMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check CHMR's competition here
KLNG vs SYNE Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 63. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check SYNE's competition here
KLNG vs TXGE Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 57. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TXGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check TXGE's competition here
KLNG vs MSEIF Comparison July 2025
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 17M. In comparison, MSEIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.41, while MSEIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 8.81, whereas MSEIF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MSEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to MSEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.Check MSEIF's competition here