Koil Energy Solutions, Inc.
Koil Energy Solutions, Inc. KLNG Peers
See (KLNG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLNG | $1.88 | -1.57% | 22.7M | 11.75 | $0.16 | N/A |
| TNRSF | $17.34 | +5.83% | 18.6B | 10.57 | $1.64 | +4.79% |
| THNPY | $39.34 | +0.14% | 7B | 15.99 | $2.46 | +2.09% |
| THNPF | $38.00 | N/A | 6.6B | 15.38 | $2.47 | +2.22% |
| CHOLF | $0.77 | N/A | 6.6B | 7.70 | $0.10 | +3.83% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | N/A | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +3.90% |
| SUBCY | $17.88 | +0.04% | 5.3B | 27.94 | $0.64 | +4.81% |
| SAPMF | $2.62 | +1.35% | 5.1B | 15.41 | $0.17 | +7.30% |
| ACGYF | $15.93 | N/A | 4.7B | 24.89 | $0.64 | +4.09% |
| AKRYY | $9.00 | -10.00% | 4.3B | 8.26 | $1.09 | +42.68% |
Stock Comparison
KLNG vs TNRSF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TNRSF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs THNPY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while THNPY trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs THNPF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while THNPF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to THNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CHOLF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs GZPZF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SUBCY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SUBCY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SAPMF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SAPMF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ACGYF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs AKRYY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while AKRYY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs WYGPY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while WYGPY trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs WYGPF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while WYGPF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SBFFF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SBFFF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SBFFY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SBFFY trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TRRVF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TRRVF trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.97. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TGSNF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TGSNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CIMEF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CIMEF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs AKRTF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs MDIKF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CESDF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CESDF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs GZPZY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while GZPZY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PGEJF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PGEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SAWLF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PSYTF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 710.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PSYTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TOLWF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 606.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TOLWF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs HNTIY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while HNTIY trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs HNTIF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while HNTIF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SBOEF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ATONF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ATONF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SHANF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 395.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ATONY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs AKKVF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CGGYY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TOTZF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TOTZF trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs DDHLF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to DDHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs BLYFF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to BLYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CFWFF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CFWFF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SNVVF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SNVVF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SNVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PDER Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PDER trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs JUTOY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while JUTOY trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PKDC Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to PKDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs WFTSF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs POFCY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SCEYF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SCEYF trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PLSDF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PLSDF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ETOLF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ETOLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PRSEF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs MCCRF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while MCCRF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs QSEP Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while QSEP trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CAWLF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs EEYUF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs GWTI Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs POFCF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs NSFDF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while NSFDF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -39.02. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs QDRSF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to QDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs BWTX Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs WEIIF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to WEIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ENGT Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ENGT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs FOYJ Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TAGP Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TAGP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs HGHAF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while HGHAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CGPVF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs OXFCF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to OXFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs BRYFF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while BRYFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CTNR Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CTNR trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.56. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs NWPIF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs GLFH Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SKPO Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 848K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SMGI Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 615.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs IRIG Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs FSEI Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SSOF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 140K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs IESCF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to IESCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PKDCW Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs GPTC Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs WWNG Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TXLZF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 24.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CPYJ Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SGUJ Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to SGUJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TEGR Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TEGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CSSV Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs AURI Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to AURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs RTSO Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to RTSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SUBB Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs TXGE Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to TXGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs LNDT Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to LNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CTBG Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CTBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs BMMCF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs USEI Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs PTOG Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs AMCF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CDVIQ Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs POOSF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs EHYD Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to EHYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs SYNE Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 473. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is less volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs NNYR Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to NNYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ALRY Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 117. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs ISYX Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to ISYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs CHMR Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to CHMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.
KLNG vs MSEIF Comparison
KLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLNG stands at 22.7M. In comparison, MSEIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLNG is priced at $1.88, while MSEIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLNG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.75, whereas MSEIF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, KLNG's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MSEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLNG is more volatile compared to MSEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLNG.