Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad
Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad KLKBY Peers
See (KLKBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLKBY | $5.32 | +24.15% | 6.36B | 35.47 | $0.15 | +0.59% |
| WLMIF | $2.39 | +3.46% | 14.92B | 12.58 | $0.19 | +5.12% |
| WLMIY | $23.44 | -0.55% | 14.63B | 12.53 | $1.87 | +4.80% |
| MHGVY | $18.16 | -0.37% | 9.39B | 17.81 | $1.02 | +3.50% |
| MNHVF | $17.61 | N/A | 9.11B | 17.26 | $1.02 | +3.49% |
| SALRF | $54.04 | +17.48% | 7.22B | 24.90 | $2.17 | +6.04% |
| KLKBF | $6.17 | N/A | 6.87B | 11.43 | $0.54 | +1.10% |
| CHPFF | $0.78 | +6.00% | 6.59B | 11.21 | $0.07 | +3.81% |
| PPOKF | $0.39 | +15.59% | 6.44B | 39.30 | $0.01 | +0.47% |
| SALRY | $11.56 | +0.11% | 6.18B | 21.41 | $0.54 | +7.09% |
Stock Comparison
KLKBY vs WLMIF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while WLMIF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs WLMIY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.63B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while WLMIY trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs MHGVY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.39B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MHGVY trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs MNHVF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MNHVF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to MNHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SALRF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SALRF trades at $54.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs KLKBF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and KLKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs CHPFF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CHPFF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and CHPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs PPOKF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and PPOKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs SALRY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SALRY trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs CPOUF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs AAYYY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs ACOPY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while ACOPY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to ACOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs BKFKF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while BKFKF trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs IDBHF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs GARPF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GARPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs UPBMF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs KNKZF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and KNKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs ASTVF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and ASTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs SLCJY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SLCJY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs DNDPF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and DNDPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs PTABF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PTABF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and PTABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs CTTQF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.19M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and CTTQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs EDESY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 931.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while EDESY trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs GRCLF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 918.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GRCLF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and GRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs MRVSY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 744.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MRVSY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -6.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs GRGSF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 673.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GRGSF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs PPLFF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.80M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs MHPSY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 599.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MHPSY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs ASAGF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 590.71M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while ASAGF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SISAF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 561.56M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SISAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and SISAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs AAGRY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 538.91M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while AAGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs PPLFY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 492.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PPLFY trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs BRCPF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and BRCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs SLMCF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and SLMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs ORENF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 425.38M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while ORENF trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and ORENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs SLCJF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.08M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs AEPLF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 373.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while AEPLF trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs ALFDF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and ALFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs UVPOF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SARDF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SARDF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SARDY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 175.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SARDY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs STNT Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while STNT trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs DDEJF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 129.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while DDEJF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs DNDEF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.15M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs HLKKF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 48.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs NNUTU Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.63M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and NNUTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs AASZF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 29.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while AASZF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and AASZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs GARPY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 23.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GARPY trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs CTUNF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.11M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs CLAD Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CLAD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs OPTHF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 14.42M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while OPTHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs PRCF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PRCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs CMGHY Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.37M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SPZI Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 8.70M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SPZI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs PEASF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PEASF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEASF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and PEASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs HERB Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while HERB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs CMGHF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 4.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CMGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs GCEH Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GCEH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs GSFD Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 1.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GSFD trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and GSFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs RSSFF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and RSSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs STEV Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while STEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs MINE Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.26M. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MINE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs PNDHF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 813126.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and PNDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs IGPFF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 462979.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs GLGLF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430015.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs HERF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 245182.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while HERF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs MSAH Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241135.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MSAH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and MSAH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs TAER Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 232968.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while TAER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs MSRM Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 221973.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while MSRM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SHMP Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123627.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs CHYI Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 61446.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CHYI trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and CHYI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs OGAA Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46364.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while OGAA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and OGAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs URYL Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 30209.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while URYL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs SUWN Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 19963.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SUWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and SUWN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs SIAF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18107.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while SIAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and SIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs FFRMF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 1708.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs BIQIF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1003.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs FLAF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 921.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while FLAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and FLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs CFPI Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while CFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and CFPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLKBY vs URBF Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while URBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to URBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLKBY.
KLKBY vs KALRQ Comparison
KLKBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLKBY stands at 6.36B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLKBY is priced at $5.32, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 35.47, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLKBY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLKBY and KALRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).