Koninklijke KPN N.V.
Koninklijke KPN N.V. (KKPNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KKPNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KKPNY | $4.67 | -1.06% | 19.4B | 21.18 | $0.22 | +3.78% |
| DTEGF | $36.62 | -0.81% | 179.5B | 12.25 | $2.99 | +2.73% |
| DTEGY | $36.50 | -0.63% | 179.1B | 12.22 | $2.99 | +2.70% |
| SFTBF | $103.95 | +0.02% | 148.1B | 19.65 | $5.29 | +0.29% |
| SFTBY | $51.75 | -0.17% | 147.5B | 19.61 | $2.64 | +0.18% |
| NTTYY | $27.02 | -2.28% | 89.5B | 13.32 | $2.03 | +2.26% |
| NPPXF | $0.96 | -12.73% | 79.4B | 12.00 | $0.08 | +3.27% |
| SFBQF | $1.55 | -4.32% | 73.8B | 22.14 | $0.07 | +19.81% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KDDIF | $17.86 | +0.00% | 71B | 15.53 | $1.15 | +4.17% |
Stock Comparison
KKPNY vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while DTEGF trades at $36.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check DTEGF's competition here
KKPNY vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while DTEGY trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check DTEGY's competition here
KKPNY vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SFTBF trades at $103.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SFTBF's competition here
KKPNY vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SFTBY trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SFTBY's competition here
KKPNY vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while NTTYY trades at $27.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check NTTYY's competition here
KKPNY vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while NPPXF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check NPPXF's competition here
KKPNY vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SFBQF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SFBQF's competition here
KKPNY vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AMXVF's competition here
KKPNY vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while KDDIF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check KDDIF's competition here
KKPNY vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while KDDIY trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check KDDIY's competition here
KKPNY vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AMOVF's competition here
KKPNY vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SGAPY trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SGAPY's competition here
KKPNY vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SNGNF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SNGNF's competition here
KKPNY vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while CLLNY trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 81.73. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CLLNY's competition here
KKPNY vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while FNCTF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check FNCTF's competition here
KKPNY vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SWZCF trades at $740.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SWZCF's competition here
KKPNY vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SCMWY trades at $73.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SCMWY's competition here
KKPNY vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLGPY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLGPY's competition here
KKPNY vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TTRAF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TTRAF's competition here
KKPNY vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TEFOF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -35.10. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TEFOF's competition here
KKPNY vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while VODPF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check VODPF's competition here
KKPNY vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BTGOF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BTGOF's competition here
KKPNY vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AVIFY trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AVIFY's competition here
KKPNY vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TELNF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELNF's competition here
KKPNY vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TELNY trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELNY's competition here
KKPNY vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CTOWY's competition here
KKPNY vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while CHWRF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CHWRF's competition here
KKPNY vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while RCIAF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check RCIAF's competition here
KKPNY vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while KKPNF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check KKPNF's competition here
KKPNY vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AVIVF's competition here
KKPNY vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check ELMUY's competition here
KKPNY vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AVIKF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLKMF's competition here
KKPNY vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while MTNOF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MTNOF's competition here
KKPNY vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while VDMCY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check VDMCY's competition here
KKPNY vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while MTNOY trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MTNOY's competition here
KKPNY vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while HLTOY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HLTOY's competition here
KKPNY vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SJRWF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLSNF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLSNY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLSNY's competition here
KKPNY vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BCEPF trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BCEPF's competition here
KKPNY vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BECEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BECEF's competition here
KKPNY vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TIAIY trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TIAIY's competition here
KKPNY vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TIAJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TIAJF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLTZY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLTZY's competition here
KKPNY vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TCPFF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLTZF trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLTZF's competition here
KKPNY vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HKTTF's competition here
KKPNY vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TIAOF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TIAOF's competition here
KKPNY vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check VODAF's competition here
KKPNY vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AAFRF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AAFRF's competition here
KKPNY vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while HKTTY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HKTTY's competition here
KKPNY vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BCPPF's competition here
KKPNY vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BCEXF's competition here
KKPNY vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check LBRDB's competition here
KKPNY vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check DIGBF's competition here
KKPNY vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check ELMUF's competition here
KKPNY vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELDF's competition here
KKPNY vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SHNUF's competition here
KKPNY vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELDY's competition here
KKPNY vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SOBKY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SOBKY's competition here
KKPNY vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AARTY's competition here
KKPNY vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while FRTAY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check FRTAY's competition here
KKPNY vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while QBCRF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check QBCRF's competition here
KKPNY vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MYTEF's competition here
KKPNY vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while QBCAF trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check QBCAF's competition here
KKPNY vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HLTOF's competition here
KKPNY vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MAXSF's competition here
KKPNY vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AXXTF's competition here
KKPNY vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PCCWY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -136.80. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PCCWY's competition here
KKPNY vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BZQIF's competition here
KKPNY vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BZQIY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BZQIY's competition here
KKPNY vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PTITF's competition here
KKPNY vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TRKNY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TRKNY's competition here
KKPNY vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TKAGY's competition here
KKPNY vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PCWLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -64.05. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PCWLF's competition here
KKPNY vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check UDIRF's competition here
KKPNY vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check GTMEY's competition here
KKPNY vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PHTCF's competition here
KKPNY vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while CUCSY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CUCSY's competition here
KKPNY vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check FRTAF's competition here
KKPNY vs CUCSF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while CUCSF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CUCSF's competition here
KKPNY vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TCMFF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TCMFF's competition here
KKPNY vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TFAOF's competition here
KKPNY vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while IIJIF trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check IIJIF's competition here
KKPNY vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while IIJIY trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check IIJIY's competition here
KKPNY vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BGAOF's competition here
KKPNY vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PTXKY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PTXKY's competition here
KKPNY vs MICCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MICCF's competition here
KKPNY vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TACYY's competition here
KKPNY vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while BGAOY trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BGAOY's competition here
KKPNY vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TRKNF's competition here
KKPNY vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while SPKKY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SPKKY's competition here
KKPNY vs TLGHY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLGHY's competition here
KKPNY vs PTTWF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PTTWF's competition here
KKPNY vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check GMOYF's competition here
KKPNY vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while NZTCF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check NZTCF's competition here
KKPNY vs PHRZF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PHRZF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while PHRZF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PHRZF's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PHRZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PHRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PHRZF's competition here
KKPNY vs CHRUF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.67, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CHRUF's competition here