Koninklijke KPN N.V.
Koninklijke KPN N.V. (KKPNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KKPNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KKPNY | $4.65 | +3.79% | 18B | 21.05 | $0.22 | +3.59% |
| DTEGY | $36.04 | +0.61% | 178.5B | 12.70 | $2.84 | +2.76% |
| DTEGF | $35.87 | -0.87% | 175.8B | 12.46 | $2.88 | +2.81% |
| SFTBF | $75.41 | -0.63% | 108.4B | 14.36 | $5.25 | +0.40% |
| SFTBY | $37.89 | -0.68% | 108.1B | 14.48 | $2.62 | +0.26% |
| NTTYY | $26.23 | +3.47% | 86.5B | 12.98 | $2.01 | +2.41% |
| NPPXF | $0.93 | -18.07% | 77.3B | 11.68 | $0.08 | +3.81% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SFBQF | $1.47 | +0.68% | 70B | 21.00 | $0.07 | +4.01% |
| KDDIY | $16.70 | +1.83% | 67.5B | 14.65 | $1.14 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
KKPNY vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while DTEGY trades at $36.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check DTEGY's competition here
KKPNY vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 175.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while DTEGF trades at $35.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check DTEGF's competition here
KKPNY vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SFTBF trades at $75.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SFTBF's competition here
KKPNY vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SFTBY trades at $37.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SFTBY's competition here
KKPNY vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while NTTYY trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check NTTYY's competition here
KKPNY vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while NPPXF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check NPPXF's competition here
KKPNY vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AMXVF's competition here
KKPNY vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SFBQF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SFBQF's competition here
KKPNY vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while KDDIY trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check KDDIY's competition here
KKPNY vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AMOVF's competition here
KKPNY vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while KDDIF trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check KDDIF's competition here
KKPNY vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CLLNY trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 82.45. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CLLNY's competition here
KKPNY vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SGAPY trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SGAPY's competition here
KKPNY vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SNGNF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SNGNF's competition here
KKPNY vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while FNCTF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check FNCTF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLGPY trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLGPY's competition here
KKPNY vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SCMWY trades at $69.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SCMWY's competition here
KKPNY vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SWZCF trades at $696.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SWZCF's competition here
KKPNY vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TTRAF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TTRAF's competition here
KKPNY vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AVIFY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AVIFY's competition here
KKPNY vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TEFOF trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -31.62. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TEFOF's competition here
KKPNY vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while VODPF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check VODPF's competition here
KKPNY vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BTGOF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BTGOF's competition here
KKPNY vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CTOWY's competition here
KKPNY vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TELNY trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELNY's competition here
KKPNY vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TELNF trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELNF's competition here
KKPNY vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CHWRF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CHWRF's competition here
KKPNY vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while RCIAF trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check RCIAF's competition here
KKPNY vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while KKPNF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check KKPNF's competition here
KKPNY vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AVIVF's competition here
KKPNY vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check ELMUY's competition here
KKPNY vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AVIKF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLKMF's competition here
KKPNY vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while MTNOY trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -28.53. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MTNOY's competition here
KKPNY vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while VDMCY trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check VDMCY's competition here
KKPNY vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SJRWF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLSNF's competition here
KKPNY vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while HLTOY trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HLTOY's competition here
KKPNY vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLSNY trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLSNY's competition here
KKPNY vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MTNOF's competition here
KKPNY vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BCEPF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BCEPF's competition here
KKPNY vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BECEF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BECEF's competition here
KKPNY vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while HKTTY trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HKTTY's competition here
KKPNY vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TCPFF's competition here
KKPNY vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HKTTF's competition here
KKPNY vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check VODAF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLTZY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLTZY's competition here
KKPNY vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TIAIY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TIAIY's competition here
KKPNY vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TIAOF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TIAOF's competition here
KKPNY vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AAFRF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AAFRF's competition here
KKPNY vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BCPPF's competition here
KKPNY vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLTZF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLTZF's competition here
KKPNY vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BCEXF's competition here
KKPNY vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check DIGBF's competition here
KKPNY vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check ELMUF's competition here
KKPNY vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TIAJF's competition here
KKPNY vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check FRTAY's competition here
KKPNY vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELDF's competition here
KKPNY vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SHNUF's competition here
KKPNY vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TELDY's competition here
KKPNY vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AARTY's competition here
KKPNY vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SOBKY trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SOBKY's competition here
KKPNY vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while QBCAF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check QBCAF's competition here
KKPNY vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while QBCRF trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check QBCRF's competition here
KKPNY vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MYTEF's competition here
KKPNY vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check HLTOF's competition here
KKPNY vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while PCCWY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PCCWY's competition here
KKPNY vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check LBRDB's competition here
KKPNY vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MAXSF's competition here
KKPNY vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while PCWLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -71.23. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PCWLF's competition here
KKPNY vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check AXXTF's competition here
KKPNY vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BZQIF's competition here
KKPNY vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BZQIY trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BZQIY's competition here
KKPNY vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PTITF's competition here
KKPNY vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TKAGY's competition here
KKPNY vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TRKNY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TRKNY's competition here
KKPNY vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -75.93. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check UDIRF's competition here
KKPNY vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check GTMEY's competition here
KKPNY vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PHTCF's competition here
KKPNY vs CUCSF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CUCSF's competition here
KKPNY vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check FRTAF's competition here
KKPNY vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TCMFF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TCMFF's competition here
KKPNY vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TFAOF's competition here
KKPNY vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while IIJIF trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check IIJIF's competition here
KKPNY vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while IIJIY trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check IIJIY's competition here
KKPNY vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BGAOF's competition here
KKPNY vs MICCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check MICCF's competition here
KKPNY vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while NZTCF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check NZTCF's competition here
KKPNY vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TACYY's competition here
KKPNY vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CUCSY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CUCSY's competition here
KKPNY vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TRKNF's competition here
KKPNY vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while PTXKY trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PTXKY's competition here
KKPNY vs TLGHY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check TLGHY's competition here
KKPNY vs PTTWF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check PTTWF's competition here
KKPNY vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while SPKKY trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check SPKKY's competition here
KKPNY vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while BGAOY trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check BGAOY's competition here
KKPNY vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check GMOYF's competition here
KKPNY vs CLCMF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CLCMF's competition here
KKPNY vs CHRUF Comparison August 2025
KKPNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KKPNY stands at 18B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KKPNY is priced at $4.65, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KKPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.05, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, KKPNY's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KKPNY is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KKPNY.Check CHRUF's competition here