Kinovo plc
Kinovo plc (KINO.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KINO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINO.L | £87.00 | +0.00% | 55.1M | 10.88 | £0.08 | N/A |
| 0KSR.L | £419.15 | +2.12% | 61.9B | 127.18 | £3.28 | +0.09% |
| LTOD.L | £22.20 | +0.45% | 30.5B | 17.48 | £1.27 | +1.78% |
| 0DH7.L | £154.40 | -0.64% | 16.9B | 16.42 | £9.40 | +3.18% |
| 0OFP.IL | £185.15 | +0.24% | 16.8B | 13.40 | £13.82 | +4.56% |
| 0H9N.L | £114.76 | +1.12% | 15B | 78.17 | £1.45 | +0.87% |
| 0IQC.L | £56.11 | +1.34% | 9.2B | -23.39 | -£2.40 | N/A |
| 0MKP.L | £79.40 | +0.51% | 9.2B | 13.91 | £5.71 | +3.15% |
| BAB.L | £1,043.00 | -0.76% | 5.3B | 21.73 | £0.48 | +0.51% |
| BBY.L | £531.00 | -0.28% | 2.6B | 15.62 | £0.34 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
KINO.L vs 0KSR.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0KSR.L has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0KSR.L trades at £419.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0KSR.L's P/E ratio is 127.18. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0KSR.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0KSR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0KSR.L's competition here
KINO.L vs LTOD.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, LTOD.L has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while LTOD.L trades at £22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas LTOD.L's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to LTOD.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and LTOD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTOD.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0DH7.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0DH7.L has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0DH7.L trades at £154.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0DH7.L's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0DH7.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and 0DH7.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0DH7.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0OFP.IL Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0OFP.IL has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0OFP.IL trades at £185.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0OFP.IL's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0OFP.IL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0OFP.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0OFP.IL's competition here
KINO.L vs 0H9N.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0H9N.L has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0H9N.L trades at £114.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0H9N.L's P/E ratio is 78.17. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0H9N.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and 0H9N.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0H9N.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0IQC.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0IQC.L has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0IQC.L trades at £56.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0IQC.L's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0IQC.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0IQC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0IQC.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0MKP.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0MKP.L has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0MKP.L trades at £79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0MKP.L's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0MKP.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0MKP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0MKP.L's competition here
KINO.L vs BAB.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BAB.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while BAB.L trades at £1,043.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas BAB.L's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to BAB.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to BAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check BAB.L's competition here
KINO.L vs BBY.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BBY.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while BBY.L trades at £531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas BBY.L's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to BBY.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to BBY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check BBY.L's competition here
KINO.L vs MGNS.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, MGNS.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while MGNS.L trades at £4,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas MGNS.L's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to MGNS.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to MGNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check MGNS.L's competition here
KINO.L vs HILS.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, HILS.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while HILS.L trades at £2,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas HILS.L's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to HILS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to HILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check HILS.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0R53.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0R53.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0R53.L trades at £10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0R53.L's P/E ratio is 646.88. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0R53.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0R53.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0R53.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0M6I.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0M6I.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0M6I.L trades at £52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0M6I.L's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0M6I.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0M6I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0M6I.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0QO2.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0QO2.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0QO2.L trades at £142.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0QO2.L's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0QO2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0QO2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0QO2.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0R8F.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0R8F.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0R8F.L trades at £57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0R8F.L's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0R8F.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0R8F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0R8F.L's competition here
KINO.L vs KLR.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, KLR.L has a market cap of 966.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while KLR.L trades at £1,386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas KLR.L's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to KLR.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to KLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check KLR.L's competition here
KINO.L vs KIE.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, KIE.L has a market cap of 841M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while KIE.L trades at £198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas KIE.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to KIE.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to KIE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check KIE.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0OA7.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0OA7.L has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0OA7.L trades at £48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0OA7.L's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0OA7.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0OA7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0OA7.L's competition here
KINO.L vs RNWH.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, RNWH.L has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while RNWH.L trades at £824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas RNWH.L's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to RNWH.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to RNWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check RNWH.L's competition here
KINO.L vs GFRD.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, GFRD.L has a market cap of 441.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while GFRD.L trades at £449.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas GFRD.L's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to GFRD.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to GFRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check GFRD.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0QNT.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0QNT.L has a market cap of 436.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0QNT.L trades at £23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0QNT.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0QNT.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0QNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0QNT.L's competition here
KINO.L vs COST.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, COST.L has a market cap of 426.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while COST.L trades at £158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas COST.L's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to COST.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to COST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check COST.L's competition here
KINO.L vs SUR.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SUR.L has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while SUR.L trades at £124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SUR.L's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to SUR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to SUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check SUR.L's competition here
KINO.L vs SFR.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SFR.L has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while SFR.L trades at £32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SFR.L's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to SFR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to SFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check SFR.L's competition here
KINO.L vs CTO.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CTO.L has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while CTO.L trades at £159.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas CTO.L's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to CTO.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to CTO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check CTO.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0QIH.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0QIH.L has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0QIH.L trades at £0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0QIH.L's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0QIH.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and 0QIH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0QIH.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0F7F.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0F7F.L has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0F7F.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0F7F.L's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0F7F.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and 0F7F.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0F7F.L's competition here
KINO.L vs BILN.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, BILN.L has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while BILN.L trades at £375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas BILN.L's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to BILN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to BILN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check BILN.L's competition here
KINO.L vs SMJ.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, SMJ.L has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while SMJ.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SMJ.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to SMJ.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and SMJ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMJ.L's competition here
KINO.L vs VANL.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, VANL.L has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while VANL.L trades at £38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas VANL.L's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to VANL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to VANL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check VANL.L's competition here
KINO.L vs HERC.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, HERC.L has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while HERC.L trades at £42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas HERC.L's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to HERC.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to HERC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check HERC.L's competition here
KINO.L vs NEXS.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NEXS.L has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while NEXS.L trades at £156.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas NEXS.L's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to NEXS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to NEXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check NEXS.L's competition here
KINO.L vs TGP.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, TGP.L has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while TGP.L trades at £6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas TGP.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to TGP.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to TGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check TGP.L's competition here
KINO.L vs AUK.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, AUK.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while AUK.L trades at £1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas AUK.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to AUK.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to AUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check AUK.L's competition here
KINO.L vs RAI.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, RAI.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while RAI.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas RAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to RAI.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to RAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check RAI.L's competition here
KINO.L vs FCRM.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, FCRM.L has a market cap of 718.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while FCRM.L trades at £0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas FCRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to FCRM.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KINO.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and FCRM.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check FCRM.L's competition here
KINO.L vs TPG.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, TPG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while TPG.L trades at £2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas TPG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to TPG.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KINO.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and TPG.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check TPG.L's competition here
KINO.L vs CLLN.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, CLLN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while CLLN.L trades at £0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas CLLN.L's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to CLLN.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L and CLLN.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLLN.L's competition here
KINO.L vs JLG.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, JLG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while JLG.L trades at £402.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas JLG.L's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to JLG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to JLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check JLG.L's competition here
KINO.L vs NMCN.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, NMCN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while NMCN.L trades at £117.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas NMCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to NMCN.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to NMCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check NMCN.L's competition here
KINO.L vs 0DMQ.L Comparison July 2025
KINO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINO.L stands at 55.1M. In comparison, 0DMQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINO.L is priced at £87.00, while 0DMQ.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas 0DMQ.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, KINO.L's ROE is -1.69%, compared to 0DMQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINO.L is less volatile compared to 0DMQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINO.L.Check 0DMQ.L's competition here