Kinross Gold Corporation
Kinross Gold Corporation (KIN2.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIN2.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIN2.DE | €25.86 | +3.69% | 30.4B | 14.98 | €1.69 | +0.46% |
| NMM.DE | €92.58 | +4.14% | 99.4B | 16.50 | €5.54 | +0.95% |
| ABR0.DE | €34.60 | +3.22% | 56.2B | 13.30 | €2.52 | +2.17% |
| ABR.DE | €16.99 | +0.46% | 29.2B | 14.40 | €1.18 | +0.52% |
| HCL.DE | €15.66 | +0.38% | 10.4B | 37.04 | €0.42 | +0.08% |
| CDM1.DE | €15.33 | +2.58% | 9.7B | 18.51 | €0.82 | N/A |
| RNY.DE | €5.39 | +0.00% | 5.2B | -5.74 | -€0.94 | N/A |
| RKVA.F | €15.31 | +7.90% | 2.2B | 9.92 | €1.45 | N/A |
| V46.F | €2.24 | +0.00% | 457M | -32.00 | -€0.07 | N/A |
| 1I1.F | €1.91 | +3.80% | 378.9M | -91.50 | -€0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KIN2.DE vs NMM.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, NMM.DE has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while NMM.DE trades at €92.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas NMM.DE's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NMM.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to NMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check NMM.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs ABR0.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, ABR0.DE has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while ABR0.DE trades at €34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas ABR0.DE's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ABR0.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to ABR0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check ABR0.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs ABR.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, ABR.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while ABR.DE trades at €16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas ABR.DE's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ABR.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to ABR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check ABR.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs HCL.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, HCL.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while HCL.DE trades at €15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas HCL.DE's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HCL.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to HCL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check HCL.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs CDM1.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CDM1.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while CDM1.DE trades at €15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas CDM1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CDM1.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is less volatile compared to CDM1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check CDM1.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs RNY.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, RNY.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while RNY.DE trades at €5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas RNY.DE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RNY.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to RNY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check RNY.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs RKVA.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, RKVA.F has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while RKVA.F trades at €15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas RKVA.F's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RKVA.F's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is less volatile compared to RKVA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check RKVA.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs V46.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, V46.F has a market cap of 457M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while V46.F trades at €2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas V46.F's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to V46.F's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to V46.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check V46.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs 1I1.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, 1I1.F has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while 1I1.F trades at €1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas 1I1.F's P/E ratio is -91.50. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 1I1.F's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is less volatile compared to 1I1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check 1I1.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs 1A9.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, 1A9.F has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while 1A9.F trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas 1A9.F's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 1A9.F's ROE of +117.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to 1A9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check 1A9.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs BBDB.DE Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, BBDB.DE has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while BBDB.DE trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas BBDB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BBDB.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is less volatile compared to BBDB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check BBDB.DE's competition here
KIN2.DE vs 1ET.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, 1ET.F has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while 1ET.F trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas 1ET.F's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 1ET.F's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to 1ET.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check 1ET.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs E1K.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, E1K.F has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while E1K.F trades at €0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas E1K.F's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to E1K.F's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to E1K.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check E1K.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs 0GC0.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, 0GC0.F has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while 0GC0.F trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas 0GC0.F's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 0GC0.F's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to 0GC0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check 0GC0.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs T23A.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, T23A.F has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while T23A.F trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas T23A.F's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to T23A.F's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is more volatile compared to T23A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check T23A.F's competition here
KIN2.DE vs 0MZ.F Comparison April 2026
KIN2.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIN2.DE stands at 30.4B. In comparison, 0MZ.F has a market cap of 652.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KIN2.DE is priced at €25.86, while 0MZ.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIN2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.98, whereas 0MZ.F's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KIN2.DE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 0MZ.F's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KIN2.DE is less volatile compared to 0MZ.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIN2.DE.Check 0MZ.F's competition here