Purpose Gold Bullion Fund
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KILO.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KILO.TO | CA$49.01 | +1.01% | 202.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CGL.TO | CA$26.18 | +0.89% | 2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SVR.TO | CA$18.24 | +1.45% | 221.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HNU.TO | CA$16.15 | -7.98% | 185.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SPXU.TO | CA$28.76 | +2.90% | 168.1M | 27.75 | CA$1.04 | N/A |
| HSU.TO | CA$26.47 | +1.93% | 158.7M | 28.09 | CA$0.94 | N/A |
| HND.TO | CA$11.03 | +7.93% | 97.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HOU.TO | CA$10.60 | +1.15% | 83.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HOD.TO | CA$5.36 | -1.29% | 65.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| QQD.TO | CA$7.68 | -3.03% | 61.8M | 32.36 | CA$0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KILO.TO vs CGL.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, CGL.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while CGL.TO trades at CA$26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO and CGL.TO have similar daily volatility (1.42).Check CGL.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs SVR.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, SVR.TO has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while SVR.TO trades at CA$18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to SVR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check SVR.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HNU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HNU.TO has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HNU.TO trades at CA$16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HNU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HNU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs SPXU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, SPXU.TO has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while SPXU.TO trades at CA$28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to SPXU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check SPXU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HSU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HSU.TO has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HSU.TO trades at CA$26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSU.TO's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HSU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HSU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HND.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HND.TO has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HND.TO trades at CA$11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HND.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HND.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HOU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HOU.TO has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HOU.TO trades at CA$10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO and HOU.TO have similar daily volatility (1.42).Check HOU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HOD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HOD.TO has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HOD.TO trades at CA$5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HOD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HOD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs QQD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, QQD.TO has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while QQD.TO trades at CA$7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQD.TO's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to QQD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check QQD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HXU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HXU.TO has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HXU.TO trades at CA$27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HXU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HXU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs SPXD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, SPXD.TO has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while SPXD.TO trades at CA$12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXD.TO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to SPXD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check SPXD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs CNDU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, CNDU.TO has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while CNDU.TO trades at CA$34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNDU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNDU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to CNDU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check CNDU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HQD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HQD.TO has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HQD.TO trades at CA$10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HQD.TO's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HQD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HQD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HQD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HSD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HSD.TO has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HSD.TO trades at CA$15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSD.TO's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HSD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HSD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs CFOU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, CFOU.TO has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while CFOU.TO trades at CA$39.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFOU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFOU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to CFOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check CFOU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HFU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HFU.TO has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HFU.TO trades at CA$32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HFU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HFU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs VOLX.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, VOLX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while VOLX.TO trades at CA$6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOLX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOLX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to VOLX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check VOLX.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs GLDU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, GLDU.TO has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while GLDU.TO trades at CA$24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to GLDU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check GLDU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs CNDD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, CNDD.TO has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while CNDD.TO trades at CA$17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNDD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNDD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to CNDD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check CNDD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HXD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HXD.TO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HXD.TO trades at CA$23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HXD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HXD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HUV.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HUV.TO has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HUV.TO trades at CA$7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HUV.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HGD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HGD.TO has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HGD.TO trades at CA$26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HGD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs SBT.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, SBT.TO has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while SBT.TO trades at CA$19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to SBT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check SBT.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HBU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HBU.TO has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HBU.TO trades at CA$18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HBU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HBU.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HFD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HFD.TO has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HFD.TO trades at CA$6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFD.TO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HFD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HFD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs CFOD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, CFOD.TO has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while CFOD.TO trades at CA$4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFOD.TO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFOD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to CFOD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check CFOD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs SLVD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, SLVD.TO has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while SLVD.TO trades at CA$4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to SLVD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check SLVD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HZD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HZD.TO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HZD.TO trades at CA$7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HZD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HZD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HZD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HRED.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HRED.TO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HRED.TO trades at CA$14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRED.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HRED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HRED.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs GLDD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, GLDD.TO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while GLDD.TO trades at CA$16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to GLDD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check GLDD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HBD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HBD.TO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HBD.TO trades at CA$24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to HBD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HBD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs NRGD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, NRGD.TO has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while NRGD.TO trades at CA$19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to NRGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check NRGD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs HED.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, HED.TO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while HED.TO trades at CA$23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HED.TO's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is less volatile compared to HED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check HED.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs RITD.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, RITD.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while RITD.TO trades at CA$11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RITD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to RITD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check RITD.TO's competition here
KILO.TO vs PEU.TO Comparison August 2025
KILO.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KILO.TO stands at 202.7M. In comparison, PEU.TO has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KILO.TO is priced at CA$49.01, while PEU.TO trades at CA$27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KILO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KILO.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KILO.TO is more volatile compared to PEU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KILO.TO.Check PEU.TO's competition here