HPN Holdings, Inc.
HPN Holdings, Inc. (KICK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KICK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KICK | $8.75 | +0.00% | 83.4M | -0.14 | -$62.32 | N/A |
| NCBDY | $16.13 | -1.35% | 42.2B | 24.06 | $0.67 | +0.79% |
| OLCLF | $23.74 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 46.55 | $0.51 | +0.40% |
| CUKPF | $27.00 | -0.37% | 38.6B | 14.14 | $1.91 | N/A |
| ANPDF | $12.75 | +9.44% | 35.4B | 16.78 | $0.76 | +2.37% |
| OLCLY | $20.56 | -2.79% | 33.6B | 40.20 | $0.51 | +0.37% |
| ANPDY | $285.64 | -3.17% | 32B | 15.14 | $18.90 | +2.65% |
| NCBDF | $33.13 | +10.43% | 21.1B | 24.54 | $1.35 | +1.44% |
| SHMDF | $121.60 | -0.12% | 10.7B | 44.06 | $2.76 | +1.71% |
| SMNNY | $10.93 | -3.53% | 9.6B | 39.21 | $0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KICK vs NCBDY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while NCBDY trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check NCBDY's competition here
KICK vs OLCLF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while OLCLF trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check OLCLF's competition here
KICK vs CUKPF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CUKPF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CUKPF's competition here
KICK vs ANPDF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while ANPDF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to ANPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check ANPDF's competition here
KICK vs OLCLY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while OLCLY trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check OLCLY's competition here
KICK vs ANPDY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while ANPDY trades at $285.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check ANPDY's competition here
KICK vs NCBDF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while NCBDF trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to NCBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check NCBDF's competition here
KICK vs SHMDF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while SHMDF trades at $121.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to SHMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check SHMDF's competition here
KICK vs SMNNY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while SMNNY trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check SMNNY's competition here
KICK vs GMWKF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while GMWKF trades at $220.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check GMWKF's competition here
KICK vs THUPY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while THUPY trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check THUPY's competition here
KICK vs LNNGF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while LNNGF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check LNNGF's competition here
KICK vs LNNGY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while LNNGY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check LNNGY's competition here
KICK vs THLPF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check THLPF's competition here
KICK vs YAMCF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while YAMCF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check YAMCF's competition here
KICK vs YAMCY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while YAMCY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check YAMCY's competition here
KICK vs NINOF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check NINOF's competition here
KICK vs NINOY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while NINOY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 79.32. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check NINOY's competition here
KICK vs TCCHF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to TCCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check TCCHF's competition here
KICK vs TOMYY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check TOMYY's competition here
KICK vs RNDOF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check RNDOF's competition here
KICK vs BSFFF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BSFFF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is -403.57. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BSFFF's competition here
KICK vs SNMSF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while SNMSF trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check SNMSF's competition here
KICK vs YONXF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to YONXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check YONXF's competition here
KICK vs CTVIF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CTVIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CTVIF's competition here
KICK vs DTCGF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check DTCGF's competition here
KICK vs DRMMF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while DRMMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check DRMMF's competition here
KICK vs CLPIF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CLPIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CLPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CLPIF's competition here
KICK vs MPZAF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 81.09. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check MPZAF's competition here
KICK vs HRVFF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while HRVFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check HRVFF's competition here
KICK vs HISJF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to HISJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check HISJF's competition here
KICK vs MPZAY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check MPZAY's competition here
KICK vs BTEAF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to BTEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BTEAF's competition here
KICK vs TNIEF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while TNIEF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check TNIEF's competition here
KICK vs SHOFF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 638.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while SHOFF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to SHOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check SHOFF's competition here
KICK vs UETMF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 558.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check UETMF's competition here
KICK vs VVCHF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while VVCHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to VVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check VVCHF's competition here
KICK vs CLKXF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CLKXF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CLKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CLKXF's competition here
KICK vs OQLGF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to OQLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check OQLGF's competition here
KICK vs GYYMF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to GYYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check GYYMF's competition here
KICK vs GBBYF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check GBBYF's competition here
KICK vs FOCIF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to FOCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check FOCIF's competition here
KICK vs PYHOF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check PYHOF's competition here
KICK vs RPNMF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check RPNMF's competition here
KICK vs PMTYF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while PMTYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to PMTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check PMTYF's competition here
KICK vs BOLL Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to BOLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BOLL's competition here
KICK vs CGROF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CGROF's competition here
KICK vs GFIZF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to GFIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check GFIZF's competition here
KICK vs CNLFF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CNLFF's competition here
KICK vs PRKA Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while PRKA trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check PRKA's competition here
KICK vs KENS Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while KENS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to KENS's ROE of +7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to KENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check KENS's competition here
KICK vs DSHK Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check DSHK's competition here
KICK vs BWMG Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BWMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BWMG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BWMG's competition here
KICK vs PFFEF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to PFFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check PFFEF's competition here
KICK vs VIRA Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to VIRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check VIRA's competition here
KICK vs GTHKF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check GTHKF's competition here
KICK vs TOYRF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while TOYRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check TOYRF's competition here
KICK vs QRSM Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to QRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check QRSM's competition here
KICK vs BTDG Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BTDG's competition here
KICK vs BFXXQ Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to BFXXQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BFXXQ's competition here
KICK vs MSET Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to MSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check MSET's competition here
KICK vs SPQS Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check SPQS's competition here
KICK vs TRBX Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to TRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check TRBX's competition here
KICK vs VMHG Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 154.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check VMHG's competition here
KICK vs XFTB Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to XFTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check XFTB's competition here
KICK vs VTMB Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check VTMB's competition here
KICK vs ECMH Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check ECMH's competition here
KICK vs DAAT Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to DAAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check DAAT's competition here
KICK vs ALTD Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to ALTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check ALTD's competition here
KICK vs OMWS Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check OMWS's competition here
KICK vs JMIH Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to JMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check JMIH's competition here
KICK vs GLFN Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to GLFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check GLFN's competition here
KICK vs LCLP Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to LCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check LCLP's competition here
KICK vs ROCLF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to ROCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check ROCLF's competition here
KICK vs PRXIQ Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to PRXIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check PRXIQ's competition here
KICK vs BYDC Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to BYDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check BYDC's competition here
KICK vs FTFY Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check FTFY's competition here
KICK vs CLUBQ Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CLUBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CLUBQ's competition here
KICK vs CLVFA Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to CLVFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check CLVFA's competition here
KICK vs WMGPF Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to WMGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check WMGPF's competition here
KICK vs TVPC Comparison August 2025
KICK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICK stands at 83.4M. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KICK is priced at $8.75, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KICK's ROE is +1.12%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICK is more volatile compared to TVPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICK.Check TVPC's competition here