Krungthai Card Public Company Limited
Krungthai Card Public Company Limited KGTHY Peers
See (KGTHY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGTHY | $15.00 | +23.46% | 3.87B | 17.24 | $0.87 | +1.93% |
| AGRIP | $99.80 | +0.05% | 46.82B | 103.63 | $0.96 | N/A |
| ORXCF | $19.93 | -0.35% | 22.71B | 9.63 | $2.07 | +2.92% |
| MIUFY | $13.52 | -1.67% | 9.70B | 10.99 | $1.23 | +1.95% |
| MIUFF | $6.54 | -9.79% | 9.39B | 10.38 | $0.63 | +2.16% |
| EDNMF | $36.35 | -25.21% | 8.65B | 31.07 | $1.17 | +3.27% |
| EDNMY | $15.13 | +0.87% | 7.42B | 13.51 | $1.12 | +3.90% |
| MAURY | $44.10 | +4.68% | 3.98B | 22.85 | $1.93 | +1.10% |
| FREJO | $15.20 | -8.49% | 3.53B | -167.03 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FREJP | $15.30 | -1.10% | 3.52B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KGTHY vs AGRIP Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, AGRIP has a market cap of 46.82B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while AGRIP trades at $99.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas AGRIP's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to AGRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ORXCF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 22.71B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ORXCF trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ORXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MIUFY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MIUFY has a market cap of 9.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MIUFY trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MIUFY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIUFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to MIUFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MIUFF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 9.39B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MIUFF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to MIUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs EDNMF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while EDNMF trades at $36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs EDNMY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while EDNMY trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to EDNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MAURY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MAURY trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to MAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FREJO Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FREJO trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -167.03. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FREJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FREJP Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FREJP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FREJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CSASF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CSASF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CSASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CMPRF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CMPRF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CMPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MAURF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MAURF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs KRKKF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while KRKKF trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to KRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs EHMEF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while EHMEF trades at $108.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to EHMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ZIZTF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ZIZTF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ZIZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs AEOJF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while AEOJF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to AEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs AIFLF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to AIFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs HYPOF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while HYPOF trades at $214.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 86.92. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to HYPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs UMTAF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to UMTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs AIFLY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 909.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while AIFLY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to AIFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ZNKKY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 802.77M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ZNKKY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ZNKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs PRLPF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 733.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while PRLPF trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to PRLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ECNCF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 604.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ECNCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ECNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs EGTIF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 575.11M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while EGTIF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to EGTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs SHGKY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 482.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while SHGKY trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to SHGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FDCHF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 475.56M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FDCHF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FDCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ITJTY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 361.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ITJTY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ITJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs INJJF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 338.75M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while INJJF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs IPFPF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 327.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while IPFPF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to IPFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs NECA Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while NECA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs GCSSF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 248.96M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to GCSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs HUNTF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 204.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while HUNTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CHFHF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 202.86M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CHFHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to CHFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FPLPF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 190.77M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FPLPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs SEZNL Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to SEZNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CFNB Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 174.08M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CFNB trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CFNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs IMMFF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 144.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while IMMFF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FAVO Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 93.74M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FAVO trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FAVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs RYTTF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to RYTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FIGI Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.82M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FIGI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ACCFF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 22.08M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ACCFF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ACCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs IOUFF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to IOUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs RMIAF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 10.91M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while RMIAF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs AMSA Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.47M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while AMSA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to AMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MRBLF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.61M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs GWSFF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.12M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to GWSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs KYNC Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 5.63M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while KYNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MITJF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MITJF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MITJF's ROE of -245.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to MITJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs PRPS Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while PRPS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to PRPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ALEDY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 5.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ALEDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ALEDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs SPFX Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 5.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while SPFX trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to SPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FNNZF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FNNZF has a market cap of 3.57M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FNNZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FNNZF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNNZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FNNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs MBDC Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while MBDC trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs XSHLF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs AIJTY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while AIJTY trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to AIJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CUROQ Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CUROQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CHWWF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.38M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CHWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CAFI Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CAFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ATNPQ Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925827.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs COSG Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 458596.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while COSG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to COSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CBRJ Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415596.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CYIO Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 390026.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CYIO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CFGX Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315928.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CFGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to CFGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs BCAP Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284236.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while BCAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to BCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs SUNLQ Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79203.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ECDD Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 28889.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ECDD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to ECDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FDTC Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 17426.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FDTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to FDTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs ARWD Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 7675.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while ARWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs YUANF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 4892.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while YUANF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to YUANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs RAHGF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2684.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to RAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs VIEWF Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2675.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs EPOR Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2052.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while EPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to EPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs RBRI Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 1953.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while RBRI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBRI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to RBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs WORC Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, WORC has a market cap of 1910.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while WORC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas WORC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WORC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to WORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs DKGH Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1489.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while DKGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to DKGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs GAFL Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1464.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while GAFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs WEIDY Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 1409.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is more volatile compared to WEIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs FRNV Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while FRNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.
KGTHY vs CHFI Comparison
KGTHY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGTHY stands at 3.87B. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 577.00. Regarding current trading prices, KGTHY is priced at $15.00, while CHFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGTHY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.24, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGTHY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGTHY is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGTHY.