Kenilworth Systems Corp.
Kenilworth Systems Corp. (KENS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KENS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENS | $0.10 | +0.00% | 8.6M | -10.30 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NCBDY | $16.57 | +2.73% | 43.5B | 24.82 | $0.67 | +0.80% |
| CUKPF | $27.00 | +21.95% | 38.6B | 14.14 | $1.91 | N/A |
| OLCLF | $22.00 | -7.33% | 36.1B | 43.14 | $0.51 | +0.40% |
| ANPDF | $12.75 | +0.00% | 35.4B | 17.00 | $0.75 | +2.37% |
| OLCLY | $21.17 | +2.95% | 34.8B | 41.64 | $0.51 | +0.36% |
| ANPDY | $284.22 | -0.50% | 31.9B | 15.07 | $18.84 | +2.67% |
| NCBDF | $31.50 | -4.91% | 20.1B | 23.68 | $1.33 | +1.51% |
| SHMDF | $121.60 | -0.12% | 10.7B | 44.06 | $2.76 | +1.71% |
| SMNNY | $11.03 | +0.91% | 9.7B | 39.50 | $0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KENS vs NCBDY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while NCBDY trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check NCBDY's competition here
KENS vs CUKPF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CUKPF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CUKPF's competition here
KENS vs OLCLF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while OLCLF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check OLCLF's competition here
KENS vs ANPDF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while ANPDF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to ANPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check ANPDF's competition here
KENS vs OLCLY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while OLCLY trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check OLCLY's competition here
KENS vs ANPDY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while ANPDY trades at $284.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check ANPDY's competition here
KENS vs NCBDF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while NCBDF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to NCBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check NCBDF's competition here
KENS vs SHMDF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while SHMDF trades at $121.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to SHMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check SHMDF's competition here
KENS vs SMNNY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while SMNNY trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check SMNNY's competition here
KENS vs GMWKF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while GMWKF trades at $220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check GMWKF's competition here
KENS vs THUPY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while THUPY trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check THUPY's competition here
KENS vs LNNGF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while LNNGF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check LNNGF's competition here
KENS vs LNNGY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while LNNGY trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check LNNGY's competition here
KENS vs THLPF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check THLPF's competition here
KENS vs YAMCF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while YAMCF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check YAMCF's competition here
KENS vs NINOY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while NINOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 80.85. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check NINOY's competition here
KENS vs NINOF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check NINOF's competition here
KENS vs YAMCY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while YAMCY trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check YAMCY's competition here
KENS vs RNDOF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while RNDOF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check RNDOF's competition here
KENS vs TCCHF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to TCCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check TCCHF's competition here
KENS vs TOMYY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check TOMYY's competition here
KENS vs BSFFF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BSFFF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is -403.57. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BSFFF's competition here
KENS vs SNMSF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while SNMSF trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check SNMSF's competition here
KENS vs YONXF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to YONXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check YONXF's competition here
KENS vs CTVIF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CTVIF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CTVIF's competition here
KENS vs DTCGF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check DTCGF's competition here
KENS vs CLPIF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CLPIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CLPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CLPIF's competition here
KENS vs DRMMF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while DRMMF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check DRMMF's competition here
KENS vs MPZAF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 82.59. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check MPZAF's competition here
KENS vs HRVFF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while HRVFF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check HRVFF's competition here
KENS vs HISJF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to HISJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check HISJF's competition here
KENS vs TNIEF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 775.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while TNIEF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check TNIEF's competition here
KENS vs MPZAY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check MPZAY's competition here
KENS vs BTEAF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to BTEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BTEAF's competition here
KENS vs SHOFF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 638.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while SHOFF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to SHOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check SHOFF's competition here
KENS vs UETMF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 558.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check UETMF's competition here
KENS vs VVCHF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while VVCHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to VVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check VVCHF's competition here
KENS vs CLKXF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CLKXF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CLKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CLKXF's competition here
KENS vs OQLGF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to OQLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check OQLGF's competition here
KENS vs GYYMF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to GYYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check GYYMF's competition here
KENS vs GBBYF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check GBBYF's competition here
KENS vs FOCIF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to FOCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check FOCIF's competition here
KENS vs PYHOF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check PYHOF's competition here
KENS vs RPNMF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check RPNMF's competition here
KENS vs KICK Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check KICK's competition here
KENS vs PMTYF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while PMTYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to PMTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check PMTYF's competition here
KENS vs BOLL Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to BOLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BOLL's competition here
KENS vs CGROF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CGROF's competition here
KENS vs GFIZF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to GFIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check GFIZF's competition here
KENS vs CNLFF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CNLFF's competition here
KENS vs PRKA Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while PRKA trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check PRKA's competition here
KENS vs DSHK Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check DSHK's competition here
KENS vs BWMG Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BWMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BWMG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BWMG's competition here
KENS vs PFFEF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to PFFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check PFFEF's competition here
KENS vs VIRA Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to VIRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check VIRA's competition here
KENS vs GTHKF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check GTHKF's competition here
KENS vs TOYRF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while TOYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check TOYRF's competition here
KENS vs QRSM Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to QRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check QRSM's competition here
KENS vs BTDG Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BTDG's competition here
KENS vs BFXXQ Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to BFXXQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BFXXQ's competition here
KENS vs MSET Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to MSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check MSET's competition here
KENS vs SPQS Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check SPQS's competition here
KENS vs TRBX Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to TRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check TRBX's competition here
KENS vs VMHG Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 143.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check VMHG's competition here
KENS vs XFTB Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to XFTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check XFTB's competition here
KENS vs VTMB Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check VTMB's competition here
KENS vs ECMH Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check ECMH's competition here
KENS vs DAAT Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to DAAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check DAAT's competition here
KENS vs ALTD Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to ALTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check ALTD's competition here
KENS vs OMWS Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check OMWS's competition here
KENS vs JMIH Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to JMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check JMIH's competition here
KENS vs GLFN Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to GLFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check GLFN's competition here
KENS vs LCLP Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to LCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check LCLP's competition here
KENS vs ROCLF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to ROCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check ROCLF's competition here
KENS vs PRXIQ Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to PRXIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check PRXIQ's competition here
KENS vs BYDC Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to BYDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check BYDC's competition here
KENS vs FTFY Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check FTFY's competition here
KENS vs CLVFA Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CLVFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CLVFA's competition here
KENS vs WMGPF Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to WMGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check WMGPF's competition here
KENS vs CLUBQ Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to CLUBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check CLUBQ's competition here
KENS vs TVPC Comparison August 2025
KENS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENS stands at 8.6M. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KENS is priced at $0.10, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.30, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KENS's ROE is +7.38%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENS is more volatile compared to TVPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENS.Check TVPC's competition here