Kamat Hotels (India) Limited
Kamat Hotels (India) Limited (KAMATHOTEL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KAMATHOTEL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAMATHOTEL.NS | ₹186.21 | -0.10% | 5.5B | 17.67 | ₹10.56 | N/A |
| INDHOTEL.BO | ₹676.60 | +0.30% | 963.5B | 57.02 | ₹11.87 | +0.33% |
| INDHOTEL.NS | ₹676.70 | +0.24% | 962.5B | 47.92 | ₹14.11 | +0.33% |
| EIHOTEL.NS | ₹318.45 | -1.59% | 200.4B | 31.14 | ₹10.29 | +0.47% |
| EIHOTEL.BO | ₹317.55 | -1.92% | 200.2B | 30.12 | ₹10.63 | +0.47% |
| CHALET.NS | ₹829.05 | -3.88% | 184.7B | 30.53 | ₹27.64 | +0.12% |
| CHALET.BO | ₹829.05 | -3.86% | 184.7B | 30.53 | ₹27.63 | +0.12% |
| VENTIVE.NS | ₹710.00 | +1.37% | 166.7B | 45.44 | ₹15.71 | N/A |
| THELEELA.NS | ₹439.90 | +0.61% | 146.2B | 37.64 | ₹11.63 | N/A |
| LEMONTREE.BO | ₹114.20 | -2.39% | 90.1B | 40.94 | ₹2.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs INDHOTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 963.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while INDHOTEL.BO trades at ₹676.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INDHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 57.02. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to INDHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check INDHOTEL.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs INDHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 962.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while INDHOTEL.NS trades at ₹676.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INDHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 47.92. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to INDHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check INDHOTEL.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs EIHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EIHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while EIHOTEL.NS trades at ₹318.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EIHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to EIHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check EIHOTEL.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs EIHOTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EIHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 200.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while EIHOTEL.BO trades at ₹317.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EIHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to EIHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check EIHOTEL.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs CHALET.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CHALET.NS has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while CHALET.NS trades at ₹829.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CHALET.NS's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHALET.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to CHALET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check CHALET.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs CHALET.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CHALET.BO has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while CHALET.BO trades at ₹829.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CHALET.BO's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHALET.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to CHALET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check CHALET.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs VENTIVE.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VENTIVE.NS has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while VENTIVE.NS trades at ₹710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VENTIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VENTIVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to VENTIVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check VENTIVE.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs THELEELA.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, THELEELA.NS has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while THELEELA.NS trades at ₹439.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas THELEELA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.64. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THELEELA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to THELEELA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check THELEELA.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs LEMONTREE.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LEMONTREE.BO has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while LEMONTREE.BO trades at ₹114.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas LEMONTREE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEMONTREE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to LEMONTREE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check LEMONTREE.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs LEMONTREE.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LEMONTREE.NS has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while LEMONTREE.NS trades at ₹114.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas LEMONTREE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEMONTREE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to LEMONTREE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check LEMONTREE.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs JUNIPER.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JUNIPER.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while JUNIPER.NS trades at ₹215.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas JUNIPER.NS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JUNIPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to JUNIPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check JUNIPER.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ITDC.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ITDC.BO has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ITDC.BO trades at ₹529.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ITDC.BO's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITDC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to ITDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ITDC.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ITDC.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ITDC.NS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ITDC.NS trades at ₹530.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ITDC.NS's P/E ratio is 57.51. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITDC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to ITDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ITDC.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs SAMHI.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SAMHI.BO has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while SAMHI.BO trades at ₹167.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SAMHI.BO's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAMHI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to SAMHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check SAMHI.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs SAMHI.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SAMHI.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while SAMHI.NS trades at ₹167.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SAMHI.NS's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAMHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to SAMHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check SAMHI.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs PARKHOTELS.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PARKHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while PARKHOTELS.NS trades at ₹126.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PARKHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARKHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to PARKHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check PARKHOTELS.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while BRIGHOTEL.NS trades at ₹62.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BRIGHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.40. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs TAJGVK.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TAJGVK.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while TAJGVK.NS trades at ₹343.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TAJGVK.NS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAJGVK.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to TAJGVK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check TAJGVK.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs TAJGVK.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TAJGVK.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while TAJGVK.BO trades at ₹343.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TAJGVK.BO's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAJGVK.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to TAJGVK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check TAJGVK.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs EIHAHOTELS.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EIHAHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while EIHAHOTELS.BO trades at ₹328.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EIHAHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIHAHOTELS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to EIHAHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check EIHAHOTELS.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs EIHAHOTELS.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EIHAHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while EIHAHOTELS.NS trades at ₹328.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EIHAHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIHAHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to EIHAHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check EIHAHOTELS.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ORIENTHOT.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ORIENTHOT.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ORIENTHOT.NS trades at ₹99.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ORIENTHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORIENTHOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTHOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ORIENTHOT.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ORIENTHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ORIENTHOT.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ORIENTHOT.BO trades at ₹99.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ORIENTHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORIENTHOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ORIENTHOT.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ROHLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ROHLTD.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ROHLTD.NS trades at ₹366.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ROHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to ROHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ROHLTD.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ROHLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ROHLTD.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ROHLTD.BO trades at ₹362.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ROHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to ROHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ROHLTD.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs VHLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VHLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while VHLTD.NS trades at ₹145.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to VHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check VHLTD.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ASIANHOTNR.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASIANHOTNR.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ASIANHOTNR.NS trades at ₹286.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ASIANHOTNR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASIANHOTNR.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to ASIANHOTNR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ASIANHOTNR.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ASIANHOTNR.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASIANHOTNR.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ASIANHOTNR.BO trades at ₹288.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ASIANHOTNR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASIANHOTNR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to ASIANHOTNR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ASIANHOTNR.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs KAMATHOTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KAMATHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while KAMATHOTEL.BO trades at ₹186.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KAMATHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAMATHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to KAMATHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check KAMATHOTEL.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs HLVLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HLVLTD.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while HLVLTD.BO trades at ₹8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HLVLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 117.43. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLVLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to HLVLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check HLVLTD.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs HLVLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HLVLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while HLVLTD.NS trades at ₹8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HLVLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 116.14. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLVLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to HLVLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check HLVLTD.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ADVANIHOTR.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ADVANIHOTR.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ADVANIHOTR.BO trades at ₹55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ADVANIHOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADVANIHOTR.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to ADVANIHOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ADVANIHOTR.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs ADVANIHOTR.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ADVANIHOTR.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while ADVANIHOTR.NS trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ADVANIHOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADVANIHOTR.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to ADVANIHOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check ADVANIHOTR.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs SINCLAIR.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SINCLAIR.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while SINCLAIR.NS trades at ₹73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SINCLAIR.NS's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SINCLAIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to SINCLAIR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check SINCLAIR.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs RHL.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RHL.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while RHL.NS trades at ₹190.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RHL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RHL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to RHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check RHL.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs APOLSINHOT.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, APOLSINHOT.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while APOLSINHOT.NS trades at ₹1,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas APOLSINHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APOLSINHOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to APOLSINHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check APOLSINHOT.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs RHL.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RHL.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while RHL.BO trades at ₹190.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RHL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RHL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to RHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check RHL.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs THEBYKE.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, THEBYKE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while THEBYKE.BO trades at ₹69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas THEBYKE.BO's P/E ratio is -39.39. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THEBYKE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to THEBYKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check THEBYKE.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs AHLEAST.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AHLEAST.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while AHLEAST.NS trades at ₹160.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AHLEAST.NS's P/E ratio is 191.56. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHLEAST.NS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to AHLEAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check AHLEAST.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs AHLEAST.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AHLEAST.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while AHLEAST.BO trades at ₹152.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AHLEAST.BO's P/E ratio is 191.25. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHLEAST.BO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to AHLEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check AHLEAST.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs BYKE.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BYKE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while BYKE.NS trades at ₹43.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BYKE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BYKE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to BYKE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check BYKE.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs CCHHL.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CCHHL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while CCHHL.NS trades at ₹13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CCHHL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCHHL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to CCHHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check CCHHL.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs CCHHL.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CCHHL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while CCHHL.BO trades at ₹13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CCHHL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCHHL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to CCHHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check CCHHL.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs AHLWEST.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AHLWEST.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while AHLWEST.NS trades at ₹144.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas AHLWEST.NS's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHLWEST.NS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to AHLWEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check AHLWEST.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs HAVISHA.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HAVISHA.NS has a market cap of 503M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while HAVISHA.NS trades at ₹1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HAVISHA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAVISHA.NS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to HAVISHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check HAVISHA.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs HAVISHA.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HAVISHA.BO has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while HAVISHA.BO trades at ₹1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HAVISHA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAVISHA.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to HAVISHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check HAVISHA.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs MACH.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MACH.BO has a market cap of 475.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while MACH.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MACH.BO's P/E ratio is 176.04. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to MACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check MACH.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs BLUECOAST.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BLUECOAST.NS has a market cap of 413.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while BLUECOAST.NS trades at ₹22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BLUECOAST.NS's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLUECOAST.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECOAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check BLUECOAST.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs BLUECOAST.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BLUECOAST.BO has a market cap of 411.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while BLUECOAST.BO trades at ₹23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BLUECOAST.BO's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLUECOAST.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECOAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check BLUECOAST.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs TGBHOTELS.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TGBHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while TGBHOTELS.NS trades at ₹9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TGBHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGBHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to TGBHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check TGBHOTELS.NS's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs TGBHOTELS.BO Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TGBHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while TGBHOTELS.BO trades at ₹9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas TGBHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGBHOTELS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is less volatile compared to TGBHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check TGBHOTELS.BO's competition here
KAMATHOTEL.NS vs VICEROY.NS Comparison February 2026
KAMATHOTEL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAMATHOTEL.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VICEROY.NS has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KAMATHOTEL.NS is priced at ₹186.21, while VICEROY.NS trades at ₹3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAMATHOTEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VICEROY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VICEROY.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KAMATHOTEL.NS is more volatile compared to VICEROY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAMATHOTEL.NS.Check VICEROY.NS's competition here