Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (KAIKY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KAIKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAIKY | $15.36 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 4.78 | $3.14 | +2.94% |
| CICOF | $1.95 | +12.72% | 34.3B | 4.53 | $0.43 | +11.04% |
| CICOY | $9.49 | -3.06% | 34.1B | 4.49 | $2.15 | +10.87% |
| AMKAF | $2,159.20 | +2.82% | 33.3B | 4.67 | $449.98 | +7.79% |
| AMKBF | $2,100.00 | +4.42% | 32.9B | 4.67 | $450.00 | +7.79% |
| AMKBY | $10.34 | -4.44% | 31.7B | 4.65 | $2.25 | +7.80% |
| HPGLY | $77.00 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 9.15 | $8.49 | +6.71% |
| HLAGF | $155.56 | +0.00% | 26B | 8.72 | $16.97 | +6.49% |
| ICTEF | $8.13 | +0.99% | 16.4B | 19.35 | $0.42 | +3.04% |
| NYUKF | $35.32 | +0.00% | 15.4B | 4.94 | $7.31 | +0.04% |
Stock Comparison
KAIKY vs CICOF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CICOF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CICOF's competition here
KAIKY vs CICOY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CICOY trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CICOY's competition here
KAIKY vs AMKAF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while AMKAF trades at $2,159.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check AMKAF's competition here
KAIKY vs AMKBF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while AMKBF trades at $2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check AMKBF's competition here
KAIKY vs AMKBY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while AMKBY trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check AMKBY's competition here
KAIKY vs HPGLY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HPGLY trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HPGLY's competition here
KAIKY vs HLAGF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HLAGF trades at $155.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HLAGF's competition here
KAIKY vs ICTEF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while ICTEF trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check ICTEF's competition here
KAIKY vs NYUKF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while NYUKF trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check NYUKF's competition here
KAIKY vs NPNYY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while NPNYY trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check NPNYY's competition here
KAIKY vs MSLOF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while MSLOF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check MSLOF's competition here
KAIKY vs OROVY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while OROVY trades at $92.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check OROVY's competition here
KAIKY vs MSLOY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while MSLOY trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and MSLOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSLOY's competition here
KAIKY vs KAKKF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check KAKKF's competition here
KAIKY vs OROVF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while OROVF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check OROVF's competition here
KAIKY vs CMHHF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CMHHF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CMHHF's competition here
KAIKY vs SITIY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SITIY trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check SITIY's competition here
KAIKY vs CMHHY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and CMHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMHHY's competition here
KAIKY vs QNDPF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while QNDPF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check QNDPF's competition here
KAIKY vs SITIF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SITIF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check SITIF's competition here
KAIKY vs MIHDF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and MIHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIHDF's competition here
KAIKY vs CSDXF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CSDXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CSDXF's competition here
KAIKY vs HAFNF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HAFNF's competition here
KAIKY vs CITAF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CITAF's competition here
KAIKY vs PTAUF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check PTAUF's competition here
KAIKY vs HFIAF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and HFIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HFIAF's competition here
KAIKY vs TDGMW Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while TDGMW trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check TDGMW's competition here
KAIKY vs DLPTF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check DLPTF's competition here
KAIKY vs PTAUY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check PTAUY's competition here
KAIKY vs CSPKF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CSPKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CSPKF's competition here
KAIKY vs BWLLY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and BWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWLLY's competition here
KAIKY vs HOEGF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HOEGF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HOEGF's competition here
KAIKY vs BWLLF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and BWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWLLF's competition here
KAIKY vs CADLF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CADLF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CADLF's competition here
KAIKY vs SOIEF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SOIEF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and SOIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOIEF's competition here
KAIKY vs PCFBY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while PCFBY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check PCFBY's competition here
KAIKY vs CITAY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and CITAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CITAY's competition here
KAIKY vs HHULF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HHULF's competition here
KAIKY vs WTSHF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while WTSHF trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check WTSHF's competition here
KAIKY vs CKNHF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CKNHF trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and CKNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKNHF's competition here
KAIKY vs HHULY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HHULY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HHULY's competition here
KAIKY vs HCTPF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HCTPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HCTPF's competition here
KAIKY vs PCFBF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while PCFBF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and PCFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCFBF's competition here
KAIKY vs CHDGF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CHDGF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and CHDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHDGF's competition here
KAIKY vs IRCUF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 899.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while IRCUF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check IRCUF's competition here
KAIKY vs OKENF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check OKENF's competition here
KAIKY vs MPZZF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 796.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while MPZZF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and MPZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPZZF's competition here
KAIKY vs DPBSF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 738.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while DPBSF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check DPBSF's competition here
KAIKY vs PSGFF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check PSGFF's competition here
KAIKY vs TJIPF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 649.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while TJIPF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check TJIPF's competition here
KAIKY vs LTKBF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and LTKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTKBF's competition here
KAIKY vs SEMUF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and SEMUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEMUF's competition here
KAIKY vs DMCOF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 491.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while DMCOF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check DMCOF's competition here
KAIKY vs AGMJF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while AGMJF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and AGMJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGMJF's competition here
KAIKY vs TSMTF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and TSMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSMTF's competition here
KAIKY vs CSPKY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while CSPKY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check CSPKY's competition here
KAIKY vs TTBKF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 288.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while TTBKF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check TTBKF's competition here
KAIKY vs JMSFF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and JMSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMSFF's competition here
KAIKY vs MKOTF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and MKOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKOTF's competition here
KAIKY vs HSPPF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and HSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSPPF's competition here
KAIKY vs VKGLF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and VKGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VKGLF's competition here
KAIKY vs SLOFF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and SLOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLOFF's competition here
KAIKY vs WSSTF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while WSSTF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -41.87. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check WSSTF's competition here
KAIKY vs JNSTF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check JNSTF's competition here
KAIKY vs BSEAF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while BSEAF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check BSEAF's competition here
KAIKY vs HUPHY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 76.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while HUPHY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check HUPHY's competition here
KAIKY vs AWLNF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and AWLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWLNF's competition here
KAIKY vs GEOUF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and GEOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEOUF's competition here
KAIKY vs ADCUF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and ADCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCUF's competition here
KAIKY vs ASCJF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while ASCJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check ASCJF's competition here
KAIKY vs GTMAY Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while GTMAY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and GTMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMAY's competition here
KAIKY vs SEAOF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check SEAOF's competition here
KAIKY vs ULTRF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check ULTRF's competition here
KAIKY vs TEUFF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and TEUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEUFF's competition here
KAIKY vs BBLKF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and BBLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBLKF's competition here
KAIKY vs WLOLQ Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check WLOLQ's competition here
KAIKY vs PRGNF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAIKY.Check PRGNF's competition here
KAIKY vs TEUCF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and TEUCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEUCF's competition here
KAIKY vs ITKSF Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and ITKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITKSF's competition here
KAIKY vs SEPI Comparison July 2025
KAIKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAIKY stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KAIKY is priced at $15.36, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAIKY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.78, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAIKY's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KAIKY and SEPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEPI's competition here