Majuba Hill Copper Corp.
Majuba Hill Copper Corp. JUBAF Peers
See (JUBAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUBAF | $0.01 | -13.79% | 681K | -0.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ANFGF | $25.68 | +3.84% | 25.3B | 30.57 | $0.84 | +2.14% |
| FQVLF | $17.73 | +1.66% | 14.6B | 98.08 | $0.18 | N/A |
| AIAGY | $51.35 | +19.47% | 9B | 5.61 | $9.15 | +1.60% |
| LUNMF | $10.50 | +0.19% | 9B | 87.17 | $0.12 | +2.28% |
| JIAXF | $1.76 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 5.86 | $0.29 | +5.68% |
| OZMLF | $19.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
| KGHPF | $35.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 8.56 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CSCCF | $6.12 | +1.66% | 4.6B | 55.45 | $0.11 | N/A |
| MMLTF | $0.44 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 17.30 | $0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JUBAF vs ANFGF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ANFGF trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs FQVLF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while FQVLF trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 98.08. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs AIAGY Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while AIAGY trades at $51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs LUNMF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while LUNMF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 87.17. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs JIAXF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while JIAXF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs OZMLF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs KGHPF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while KGHPF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CSCCF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CSCCF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is 55.45. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs MMLTF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while MMLTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs AIAGF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while AIAGF trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs SFRRF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while SFRRF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs IPMLF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 573M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while IPMLF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CPORF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 542.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CAMLF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 370.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CAMLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs ARREF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ARREF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs ASCUF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ASCUF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -28.17. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs AMRZF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CPPKF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 135.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CPPKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs LSANF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while LSANF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CPFXF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CPFXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs HHLKF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while HHLKF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs HDRSF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while HDRSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs EMTRF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while EMTRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs ATCUF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ATCUF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CCOXF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs NEVDF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CPPMF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CPPMF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs QCCUF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while QCCUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs DRCMF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs BZDLF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while BZDLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs PNTZF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while PNTZF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs RKCLF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs ACMDY Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ACMDY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs USCUF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while USCUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is less volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs AGLAF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs WCUFF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CPCPF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CPCPF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is less volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs BCUFF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while BCUFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs ANGUF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs FVVSF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs HLGVF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs BRVRF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs SLMFF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 733.6K. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while SLMFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CAEN Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 695.9K. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CAEN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CAEN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs INUMF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 606.6K. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while INUMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to INUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs ECMXF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446.9K. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs CROJF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, CROJF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while CROJF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to CROJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.
JUBAF vs AEOMF Comparison
JUBAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUBAF stands at 681K. In comparison, AEOMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JUBAF is priced at $0.01, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, JUBAF's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JUBAF is more volatile compared to AEOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUBAF.