JD Sports Fashion plc
JD Sports Fashion plc JDSPY Peers
See (JDSPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDSPY | $0.99 | +8.53% | 5.1B | 7.64 | $0.13 | +1.75% |
| BABAF | $13.75 | -2.76% | 263.4B | 14.78 | $0.93 | N/A |
| MPNGY | $33.39 | -0.33% | 102.9B | 21.27 | $1.57 | N/A |
| MPNGF | $16.60 | +2.46% | 101.4B | 21.01 | $0.79 | N/A |
| ANCTF | $51.45 | +0.37% | 48.8B | 18.92 | $2.72 | +1.03% |
| JDCMF | $15.75 | -8.93% | 40.7B | 7.68 | $2.05 | +3.18% |
| YAHOY | $7.16 | -0.28% | 25.5B | 24.69 | $0.29 | N/A |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | N/A | 23.4B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | N/A |
| RKUNF | $5.50 | +0.36% | 11.9B | -8.87 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| RKUNY | $5.45 | +0.55% | 11.8B | -8.79 | -$0.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JDSPY vs BABAF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 263.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BABAF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MPNGY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MPNGY trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MPNGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MPNGF trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ANCTF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ANCTF trades at $51.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs JDCMF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while JDCMF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs YAHOY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while YAHOY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs XXLLY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs RKUNF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while RKUNF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs RKUNY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while RKUNY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SNROF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SNROF trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs NCLTY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while NCLTY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs NCLTF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while NCLTF trades at $92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MONOY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MONOY trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 53.68. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SATLF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SATLF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SRTTY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SRTTY trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HKTGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ZLNDY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ZLNDY trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DFRYF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DFRYF trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 67.33. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ALEGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ALEGF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ZLDSF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ZLDSF trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MTTRY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MTTRY trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DUFRY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DUFRY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 66.13. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DELHY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DELHY trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs CDNAF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while CDNAF trades at $134.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs PETRY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs JBHIF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs CDNTF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while CDNTF trades at $186.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DLVHF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DLVHF trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MONOF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MONOF trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ELPQF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ELPQF trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs JDDSF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while JDDSF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs JTKWY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while JTKWY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs TKAYF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while TKAYF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs JUMSY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while JUMSY trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ZLPSF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs JUMSF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ZOPLY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SDIPF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SDIPF trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DNLMY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DNLMY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DROOF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DROOF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HNORY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MCARY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MCARY trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MRCIF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MRCIF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs FHNGY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while FHNGY trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs YMDAF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while YMDAF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs GRUPF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs DSITF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while DSITF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs PAHGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while PAHGF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs BTOOY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs WHTPF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while WHTPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 200.67. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs GPGNF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while GPGNF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MIZUF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MIZUF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MGLUY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MGLUY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs LEFUF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while LEFUF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MTAGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MTAGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MKRMF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs FNXTF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 987.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SCCAF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ACEHF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 684.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ACEHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HWGC Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs THGHY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while THGHY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs THGPF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 556.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while THGPF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HLFDY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HLFDY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs CRFCF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 486M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while CRFCF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ASOMY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 485.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ASOMY trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HLFDF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs KGGNF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ASOMF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 421.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SSILF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SSILF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs BHOOY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BHOOY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs GMELF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while GMELF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs KTYCF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 323.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while KTYCF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs BHHOF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs NBRNF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HMAGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SAXJY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SAXJY trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs YUMSF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while YUMSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs HKTVY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while HKTVY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs RDBBY Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs BNNNF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs AHAHF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs WCRS Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while WCRS trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs IGDFF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while IGDFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs BJURF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BJURF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs MHCRF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SPGZ Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. JDSPY has daily volatility of 4.34 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.
JDSPY vs ADBGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ALLGF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALLGF has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ALLGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ALLGF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALLGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to ALLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs PXHI Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while PXHI trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs TWRKF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs IDGBF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs RDBBF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while RDBBF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs ARTZF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs GLHD Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs CNVAF Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs FDIT Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs SNHO Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SNHO has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while SNHO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas SNHO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is less volatile compared to SNHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs RLAB Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while RLAB trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.
JDSPY vs BWTL Comparison
JDSPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JDSPY stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JDSPY is priced at $0.99, while BWTL trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JDSPY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.64, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, JDSPY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JDSPY is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JDSPY.