James Warren Tea Limited
James Warren Tea Limited (JAMESWARREN.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JAMESWARREN.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAMESWARREN.BO | ₹274.95 | +3.97% | 923.7M | 1.19 | ₹209.55 | N/A |
| DODLA.NS | ₹1,010.50 | +1.04% | 58.6B | 29.85 | ₹32.53 | +0.21% |
| DODLA.BO | ₹1,010.95 | +0.86% | 58.6B | 29.85 | ₹32.53 | +0.21% |
| EMPIND.BO | ₹860.35 | +1.71% | 5B | 13.48 | ₹61.75 | +3.00% |
| PROV.NS | ₹1,160.00 | -4.13% | 4.1B | 44.75 | ₹26.50 | N/A |
| SVJ.BO | ₹483.90 | +1.45% | 2.6B | 909.62 | ₹0.52 | N/A |
| AVEER.BO | ₹511.65 | -1.70% | 2.2B | 55.25 | ₹9.26 | +0.05% |
| MADHUSUDAN.NS | ₹143.95 | +3.56% | 2B | 12.53 | ₹10.93 | N/A |
| NEAGI.BO | ₹3,156.70 | -1.35% | 1.9B | 7.23 | ₹428.80 | +0.97% |
| FRSHTRP.BO | ₹134.90 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 129.09 | ₹1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
JAMESWARREN.BO vs DODLA.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, DODLA.NS has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while DODLA.NS trades at ₹1,010.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas DODLA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DODLA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to DODLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check DODLA.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs DODLA.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, DODLA.BO has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while DODLA.BO trades at ₹1,010.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas DODLA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DODLA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to DODLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check DODLA.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs EMPIND.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, EMPIND.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while EMPIND.BO trades at ₹860.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas EMPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to EMPIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to EMPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check EMPIND.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs PROV.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, PROV.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while PROV.NS trades at ₹1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas PROV.NS's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PROV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to PROV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check PROV.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs SVJ.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, SVJ.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while SVJ.BO trades at ₹483.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas SVJ.BO's P/E ratio is 909.62. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SVJ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to SVJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check SVJ.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs AVEER.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, AVEER.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while AVEER.BO trades at ₹511.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas AVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AVEER.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to AVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check AVEER.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs MADHUSUDAN.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, MADHUSUDAN.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while MADHUSUDAN.NS trades at ₹143.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas MADHUSUDAN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MADHUSUDAN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to MADHUSUDAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check MADHUSUDAN.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs NEAGI.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, NEAGI.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while NEAGI.BO trades at ₹3,156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas NEAGI.BO's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NEAGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to NEAGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check NEAGI.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs FRSHTRP.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, FRSHTRP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while FRSHTRP.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas FRSHTRP.BO's P/E ratio is 129.09. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FRSHTRP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to FRSHTRP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check FRSHTRP.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs PURETROP.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, PURETROP.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while PURETROP.BO trades at ₹184.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas PURETROP.BO's P/E ratio is 63.78. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PURETROP.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to PURETROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check PURETROP.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs BENGALT.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, BENGALT.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while BENGALT.BO trades at ₹145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas BENGALT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BENGALT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to BENGALT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check BENGALT.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs ESSENTIA.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, ESSENTIA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while ESSENTIA.BO trades at ₹1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas ESSENTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ESSENTIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to ESSENTIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check ESSENTIA.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs HALDER.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, HALDER.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while HALDER.BO trades at ₹257.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas HALDER.BO's P/E ratio is 3143.75. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HALDER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to HALDER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check HALDER.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs MRP.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, MRP.BO has a market cap of 933.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while MRP.BO trades at ₹86.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas MRP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MRP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to MRP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check MRP.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs ANIKINDS.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.BO has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while ANIKINDS.BO trades at ₹35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas ANIKINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 53.97. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ANIKINDS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to ANIKINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check ANIKINDS.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs ANIKINDS.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, ANIKINDS.NS has a market cap of 912.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while ANIKINDS.NS trades at ₹35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas ANIKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ANIKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to ANIKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check ANIKINDS.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs MODAIRY.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, MODAIRY.BO has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while MODAIRY.BO trades at ₹33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas MODAIRY.BO's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MODAIRY.BO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to MODAIRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check MODAIRY.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs LYKISLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, LYKISLTD.BO has a market cap of 818.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while LYKISLTD.BO trades at ₹47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas LYKISLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LYKISLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to LYKISLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check LYKISLTD.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs IBINFO.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, IBINFO.BO has a market cap of 792.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while IBINFO.BO trades at ₹606.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas IBINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to IBINFO.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to IBINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check IBINFO.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs TANVI.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, TANVI.BO has a market cap of 789M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while TANVI.BO trades at ₹61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas TANVI.BO's P/E ratio is 157.69. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TANVI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to TANVI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check TANVI.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs TIGLOB.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, TIGLOB.BO has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while TIGLOB.BO trades at ₹168.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas TIGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIGLOB.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to TIGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check TIGLOB.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs TERAI.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, TERAI.BO has a market cap of 629.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while TERAI.BO trades at ₹106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas TERAI.BO's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TERAI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is less volatile compared to TERAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check TERAI.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs FCONSUMER.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, FCONSUMER.NS has a market cap of 619.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while FCONSUMER.NS trades at ₹0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas FCONSUMER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FCONSUMER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to FCONSUMER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check FCONSUMER.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs ANVRDHI.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, ANVRDHI.BO has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while ANVRDHI.BO trades at ₹9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas ANVRDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 95.90. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ANVRDHI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to ANVRDHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check ANVRDHI.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs SWOEF.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, SWOEF.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while SWOEF.BO trades at ₹13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas SWOEF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SWOEF.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to SWOEF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check SWOEF.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs CONTILI.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, CONTILI.BO has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while CONTILI.BO trades at ₹27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas CONTILI.BO's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CONTILI.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to CONTILI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check CONTILI.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs JFL.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, JFL.BO has a market cap of 398.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while JFL.BO trades at ₹27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas JFL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JFL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to JFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check JFL.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs UNIQUEO.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, UNIQUEO.BO has a market cap of 391.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while UNIQUEO.BO trades at ₹73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas UNIQUEO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNIQUEO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is less volatile compared to UNIQUEO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check UNIQUEO.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs APIS.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, APIS.BO has a market cap of 317.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while APIS.BO trades at ₹60.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas APIS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to APIS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to APIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check APIS.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs SPECFOOD.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, SPECFOOD.BO has a market cap of 272M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while SPECFOOD.BO trades at ₹12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas SPECFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -1122.00. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SPECFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to SPECFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check SPECFOOD.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs CHORDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, CHORDIA.BO has a market cap of 262.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while CHORDIA.BO trades at ₹68.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas CHORDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CHORDIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to CHORDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check CHORDIA.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs KMGMILK.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, KMGMILK.BO has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while KMGMILK.BO trades at ₹46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas KMGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is -191.92. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KMGMILK.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to KMGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check KMGMILK.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs WORL.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, WORL.BO has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while WORL.BO trades at ₹7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas WORL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to WORL.BO's ROE of -14.90%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to WORL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check WORL.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs SCAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, SCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while SCAGRO.BO trades at ₹31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas SCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 219.13. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to SCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check SCAGRO.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs NCCBLUE.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, NCCBLUE.BO has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while NCCBLUE.BO trades at ₹24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas NCCBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NCCBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to NCCBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check NCCBLUE.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs NMSRESRC.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, NMSRESRC.BO has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while NMSRESRC.BO trades at ₹59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas NMSRESRC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NMSRESRC.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to NMSRESRC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check NMSRESRC.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs SHANTHALA.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, SHANTHALA.NS has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while SHANTHALA.NS trades at ₹26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas SHANTHALA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SHANTHALA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTHALA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check SHANTHALA.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs JETMALL.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, JETMALL.BO has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while JETMALL.BO trades at ₹31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas JETMALL.BO's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JETMALL.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to JETMALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check JETMALL.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs VIKASWSP.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, VIKASWSP.BO has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while VIKASWSP.BO trades at ₹0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas VIKASWSP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VIKASWSP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to VIKASWSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check VIKASWSP.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs ANSINDUS.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, ANSINDUS.BO has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while ANSINDUS.BO trades at ₹17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas ANSINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ANSINDUS.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to ANSINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check ANSINDUS.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs HEALTHYLIFE.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, HEALTHYLIFE.BO has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while HEALTHYLIFE.BO trades at ₹6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas HEALTHYLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to HEALTHYLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check HEALTHYLIFE.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs TDSL.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, TDSL.BO has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while TDSL.BO trades at ₹5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas TDSL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TDSL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to TDSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check TDSL.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs UNRYLMA.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, UNRYLMA.BO has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while UNRYLMA.BO trades at ₹16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas UNRYLMA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNRYLMA.BO's ROE of +4.58%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to UNRYLMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check UNRYLMA.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs UNJHAFOR.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, UNJHAFOR.BO has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while UNJHAFOR.BO trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas UNJHAFOR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNJHAFOR.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to UNJHAFOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check UNJHAFOR.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs NEWTRAC.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, NEWTRAC.BO has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while NEWTRAC.BO trades at ₹4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas NEWTRAC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NEWTRAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to NEWTRAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check NEWTRAC.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs OLYOI.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, OLYOI.BO has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while OLYOI.BO trades at ₹23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas OLYOI.BO's P/E ratio is -64.30. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OLYOI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to OLYOI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check OLYOI.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs SHAQUAK.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, SHAQUAK.BO has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while SHAQUAK.BO trades at ₹1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas SHAQUAK.BO's P/E ratio is -39.33. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SHAQUAK.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is less volatile compared to SHAQUAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check SHAQUAK.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs THAKKERS.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, THAKKERS.BO has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while THAKKERS.BO trades at ₹21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas THAKKERS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to THAKKERS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to THAKKERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check THAKKERS.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs HATSUN-RE.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, HATSUN-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while HATSUN-RE.NS trades at ₹480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas HATSUN-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HATSUN-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to HATSUN-RE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check HATSUN-RE.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs MVKAGRO-ST.NS Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, MVKAGRO-ST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while MVKAGRO-ST.NS trades at ₹576.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas MVKAGRO-ST.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to MVKAGRO-ST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check MVKAGRO-ST.NS's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs EVERTEX.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, EVERTEX.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while EVERTEX.BO trades at ₹64.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas EVERTEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to EVERTEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to EVERTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check EVERTEX.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs TINNATFL.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, TINNATFL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while TINNATFL.BO trades at ₹361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas TINNATFL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TINNATFL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to TINNATFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check TINNATFL.BO's competition here
JAMESWARREN.BO vs ICLORGANIC.BO Comparison April 2026
JAMESWARREN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JAMESWARREN.BO stands at 923.7M. In comparison, ICLORGANIC.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JAMESWARREN.BO is priced at ₹274.95, while ICLORGANIC.BO trades at ₹39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JAMESWARREN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.19, whereas ICLORGANIC.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JAMESWARREN.BO's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ICLORGANIC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JAMESWARREN.BO is more volatile compared to ICLORGANIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JAMESWARREN.BO.Check ICLORGANIC.BO's competition here