Jaco Electronics Inc.

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, RXEEY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while RXEEY trades at $31.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXEEY's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RXEEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO is less volatile compared to RXEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACO.

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, OSUKF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while OSUKF trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSUKF's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OSUKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and OSUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, RXLSF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while RXLSF trades at $28.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXLSF's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RXLSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and RXLSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, RYSVF has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while RYSVF trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYSVF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RYSVF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and RYSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, EACO has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while EACO trades at $41.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EACO's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EACO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and EACO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, SPRS has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while SPRS trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPRS's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SPRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO is less volatile compared to SPRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACO.

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, PGNT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while PGNT trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGNT's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PGNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO is less volatile compared to PGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACO.

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, RHDGF has a market cap of 583.2K. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while RHDGF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHDGF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RHDGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO is less volatile compared to RHDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACO.

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, EGIL has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while EGIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EGIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACO is less volatile compared to EGIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JACO.

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, KLGG has a market cap of 634. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while KLGG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLGG's ROE of +2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and KLGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, SEDN has a market cap of 517. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while SEDN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SEDN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and SEDN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, AEYGQ has a market cap of 149. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while AEYGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEYGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AEYGQ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and AEYGQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

JACO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JACO stands at 629. In comparison, PSYS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JACO is priced at $0.00, while PSYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JACO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JACO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PSYS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JACO and PSYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).