Interparfums SA

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OR.PA has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while OR.PA trades at €358.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas OR.PA's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OR.PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to OR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check OR.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UNA.AS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while UNA.AS trades at €48.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas UNA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNA.AS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to UNA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check UNA.AS's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSFIR.AS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while DSFIR.AS trades at €61.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas DSFIR.AS's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DSFIR.AS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to DSFIR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check DSFIR.AS's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BB.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while BB.PA trades at €54.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas BB.PA's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BB.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to BB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check BB.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ONTEX.BR has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while ONTEX.BR trades at €3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas ONTEX.BR's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ONTEX.BR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to ONTEX.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check ONTEX.BR's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JBOG.PA has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while JBOG.PA trades at €2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas JBOG.PA's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBOG.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to JBOG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check JBOG.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PORF.AS has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while PORF.AS trades at €14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas PORF.AS's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PORF.AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to PORF.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check PORF.AS's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REAL.BR has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while REAL.BR trades at €18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas REAL.BR's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REAL.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to REAL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check REAL.BR's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLSDN.PA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while MLSDN.PA trades at €29.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas MLSDN.PA's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLSDN.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to MLSDN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check MLSDN.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FAYE.PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while FAYE.PA trades at €16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas FAYE.PA's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FAYE.PA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to FAYE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check FAYE.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLGAL.PA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while MLGAL.PA trades at €2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas MLGAL.PA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLGAL.PA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to MLGAL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check MLGAL.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALMAS.PA has a market cap of 470.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while ALMAS.PA trades at €0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas ALMAS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALMAS.PA's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to ALMAS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check ALMAS.PA's competition here

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLSCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €23.50, while MLSCH.PA trades at €24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.75, whereas MLSCH.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLSCH.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to MLSCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.Check MLSCH.PA's competition here