Interparfums SA

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OR.PA has a market cap of 199.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while OR.PA trades at €363.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas OR.PA's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OR.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to OR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UNA.AS has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while UNA.AS trades at €51.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas UNA.AS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UNA.AS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to UNA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSFIR.AS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while DSFIR.AS trades at €90.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas DSFIR.AS's P/E ratio is 96.40. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSFIR.AS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to DSFIR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BB.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while BB.PA trades at €52.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas BB.PA's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BB.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to BB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ONTEX.BR has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while ONTEX.BR trades at €6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas ONTEX.BR's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ONTEX.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to ONTEX.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JBOG.PA has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while JBOG.PA trades at €4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas JBOG.PA's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBOG.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to JBOG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PORF.AS has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while PORF.AS trades at €11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas PORF.AS's P/E ratio is -191.67. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PORF.AS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to PORF.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, REAL.BR has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while REAL.BR trades at €14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas REAL.BR's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REAL.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to REAL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MLSDN.PA has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while MLSDN.PA trades at €30.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas MLSDN.PA's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLSDN.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to MLSDN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FAYE.PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while FAYE.PA trades at €16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas FAYE.PA's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FAYE.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to FAYE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALMAS.PA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while ALMAS.PA trades at €0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas ALMAS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMAS.PA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to ALMAS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MLGAL.PA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while MLGAL.PA trades at €1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas MLGAL.PA's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLGAL.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is more volatile compared to MLGAL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.

ITP.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITP.PA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MLSCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP.PA is priced at €33.02, while MLSCH.PA trades at €24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas MLSCH.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLSCH.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITP.PA is less volatile compared to MLSCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.PA.