ITOCHU Corporation

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 137.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HON trades at $214.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 120.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HTHIF trades at $26.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 75.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MMM trades at $140.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 74.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MTSUY trades at $18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 73.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MSBHF trades at $18.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ITOCF has a market cap of 71.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ITOCF trades at $50.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ITOCF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ITOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 59.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HTHIY trades at $26.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 57.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MITSF trades at $19.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 56.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MITSY trades at $392.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 35.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CTPCF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 34.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CTPCY trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 30.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MARUY trades at $179.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 29.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SSUMF trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 29.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MARUF trades at $17.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 29.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SSUMY trades at $24.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 26.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while PITAF trades at $20.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 25.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 21.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CKHUY trades at $5.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 20.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CKHUF trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 15.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GPOVF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 14.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HALMY trades at $77.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 38.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 14.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HLMAF trades at $38.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KBDCY trades at $12.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 13.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while JMHLY trades at $46.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -29.05. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while JARLF trades at $43.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -27.10. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 11.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SWRBF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 10.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SWRAY trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 9.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SWRAF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 9.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KPELY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KPELF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 8.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KHOLY trades at $17.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is 250.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SCRPF trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SKSUY trades at $80.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MYTHY trades at $46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MYTHF trades at $44.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FCODF trades at $1,511.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while VMI trades at $306.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AYALY trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BDVSF trades at $14.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while IEP trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BDVSY trades at $26.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BJINF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FOSUY trades at $12.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KTERF trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KINUF trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ALFFF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MDU trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AKAAF trades at $47.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while JGSMY trades at $9.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GFF trades at $71.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SMGBF trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NARRF trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GULRF trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KBDCF trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SEB trades at $2,557.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while VRTV trades at $169.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GULRY trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SWRBY trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while IWTNF trades at $8.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BBU trades at $21.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -62.34. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TINLF trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CODI-PC trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SGHIF trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TINLY trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MMSMY trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NICFF trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NLTBF trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CODI-PA trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CODI-PB trades at $22.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CODI trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 976.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ALGGY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 917.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BRYAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 836.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 822.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GRGCF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 723.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 708.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SPLP trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 683.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 633.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CRESY trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 587.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MATW trades at $18.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 575.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SHMWF trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 548.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while INDHF trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 504.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FIP trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 502.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CRESW trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 457.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TRC trades at $17.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 170.15. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 322.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BEVFF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 261.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TJSCF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 243.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FBYD trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 227.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while DMCHY trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while THAFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 139.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 130.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while RCMT trades at $17.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 128.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TUSK trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 101.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while IRS trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 97.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NNBR trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ICBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while APTL trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 76.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 68.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while PRTT trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -59.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ECSL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 48.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 40.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CIBY trades at $1,632.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -111.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 37.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SBOX trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 33.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GTII trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SUNTF has a market cap of 30.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SUNTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SUNTF's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 27.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FBYDW trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 24.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while IGC trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TICJ has a market cap of 17.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TICJ trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TICJ's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TICJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to TICJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GLOH has a market cap of 14.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GLOH trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GLOH's P/E ratio is -72.45. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLOH's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to GLOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GRPX has a market cap of 10.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GRPX trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GRPX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to GRPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, UMCN has a market cap of 8.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while UMCN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas UMCN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMCN's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to UMCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MONI has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MONI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MONI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MONI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MONI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, UATG has a market cap of 3.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while UATG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas UATG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UATG's ROE of +6.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to UATG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CNGI has a market cap of 3.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CNGI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CNGI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNGI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to CNGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SNTE has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SNTE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SNTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNTE's ROE of -22.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to SNTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ABLT has a market cap of 3.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ABLT trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ABLT's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ABLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GTLL has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GTLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GTLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTLL's ROE of +2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to GTLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SAHN has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SAHN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SAHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAHN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SAHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, RJDG has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while RJDG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas RJDG's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJDG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to RJDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ROSSF has a market cap of 2.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ROSSF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ROSSF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROSSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to ROSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, TTHG has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while TTHG trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas TTHG's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to TTHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while EFSH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FUNN has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FUNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FUNN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUNN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to FUNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ACMB has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ACMB trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ACMB's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ACMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HLLK has a market cap of 940969.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HLLK trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HLLK's P/E ratio is 128.29. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLLK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to HLLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AXXA has a market cap of 774788.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AXXA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AXXA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXXA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to AXXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, PTEEF has a market cap of 517012.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while PTEEF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas PTEEF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTEEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to PTEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, UPIN has a market cap of 468564.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while UPIN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas UPIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UPIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to UPIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ATMO has a market cap of 317706.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ATMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ATMO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATMO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to ATMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CIRX has a market cap of 168144.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CIRX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CIRX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ELGL has a market cap of 81696.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ELGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ELGL's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to ELGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SBDG has a market cap of 42840.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SBDG trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SBDG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBDG's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SBDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AEEI has a market cap of 33800.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AEEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AEEI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to AEEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MGLI has a market cap of 27303.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MGLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MGLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to MGLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, IVST has a market cap of 22312.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while IVST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas IVST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to IVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BCND has a market cap of 19859.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BCND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BCND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to BCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ZNNC has a market cap of 16973.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ZNNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ZNNC's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZNNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to ZNNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BIMO has a market cap of 16343.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BIMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIMO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, CBCA has a market cap of 16105.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while CBCA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas CBCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBCA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to CBCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, GEGR has a market cap of 15929.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while GEGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas GEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEGR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to GEGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MLCG has a market cap of 15128.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MLCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MLCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLCG's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MLCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, LWCTF has a market cap of 14072.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while LWCTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas LWCTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LWCTF's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to LWCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MCNO has a market cap of 8906.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MCNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MCNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, HULK has a market cap of 8478.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while HULK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas HULK's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HULK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to HULK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BMMX has a market cap of 6952.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BMMX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BMMX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, LPTC has a market cap of 6520.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while LPTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas LPTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to LPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NHGP has a market cap of 5100.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NHGP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to NHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, NOBGY has a market cap of 1327.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while NOBGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas NOBGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOBGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to NOBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, RAGL has a market cap of 1001.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while RAGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas RAGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to RAGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, EKNL has a market cap of 317.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while EKNL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas EKNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EKNL's ROE of +3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to EKNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, VBVT has a market cap of 247.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while VBVT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas VBVT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VBVT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to VBVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AMIN has a market cap of 222.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AMIN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AMIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMIN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to AMIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, AHII has a market cap of 200.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while AHII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas AHII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHII's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to AHII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, KGHI has a market cap of 132.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while KGHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas KGHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KGHI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to KGHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SHCC has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SHCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, MVPT has a market cap of 56.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while MVPT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas MVPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MVPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to MVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, RIGG has a market cap of 50.00. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while RIGG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas RIGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to RIGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, STLRU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while STLRU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ITOCY has daily volatility of 1.00 and STLRU has daily volatility of N/A.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, FNTEU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while FNTEU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ITOCY has daily volatility of 1.00 and FNTEU has daily volatility of N/A.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, JBK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while JBK trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is less volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, DOTAU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while DOTAU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ITOCY has daily volatility of 1.00 and DOTAU has daily volatility of N/A.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, OBCI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while OBCI trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, LIDM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while LIDM trades at $62.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas LIDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LIDM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to LIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, PAWH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while PAWH trades at $8,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas PAWH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAWH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to PAWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, BDGY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while BDGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas BDGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDGY's ROE of +2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to BDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, ELECU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while ELECU trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ITOCY has daily volatility of 1.00 and ELECU has daily volatility of N/A.

ITOCY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ITOCY stands at 70.39B. In comparison, SMGBY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCY is priced at $99.30, while SMGBY trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ITOCY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.53, whereas SMGBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCY's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGBY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCY is more volatile compared to SMGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCY.