ITOCHU Corporation
ITOCHU Corporation (ITOCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITOCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOCF | $55.84 | +3.03% | 79.1B | 13.43 | $4.17 | +2.43% |
| HTHIF | $29.73 | +2.52% | 135.8B | 34.57 | $0.86 | +0.99% |
| MSBHF | $21.85 | +1.63% | 83.9B | 13.66 | $1.60 | +3.12% |
| MTSUY | $21.66 | +1.79% | 83.1B | 13.54 | $1.60 | +2.53% |
| ITOCY | $110.89 | +1.87% | 78.2B | 13.28 | $8.34 | N/A |
| HTHIY | $29.50 | +1.72% | 67.3B | 34.27 | $0.86 | +0.73% |
| MITSY | $450.66 | +2.17% | 65B | 10.90 | $41.51 | +2.12% |
| MITSF | $21.93 | +1.68% | 63B | 10.54 | $2.08 | +3.09% |
| CTPCY | $7.45 | +0.00% | 45.1B | 5.65 | $1.37 | +4.97% |
| CTPCF | $1.51 | +0.00% | 43.9B | 5.59 | $0.27 | +5.09% |
Stock Comparison
ITOCF vs HTHIF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 135.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while HTHIF trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check HTHIF's competition here
ITOCF vs MSBHF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MSBHF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MSBHF's competition here
ITOCF vs MTSUY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MTSUY trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MTSUY's competition here
ITOCF vs ITOCY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while ITOCY trades at $110.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check ITOCY's competition here
ITOCF vs HTHIY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while HTHIY trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check HTHIY's competition here
ITOCF vs MITSY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MITSY trades at $450.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MITSY's competition here
ITOCF vs MITSF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MITSF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MITSF's competition here
ITOCF vs CTPCY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CTPCY trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CTPCY's competition here
ITOCF vs CTPCF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CTPCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CTPCF's competition here
ITOCF vs MARUF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MARUF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MARUF's competition here
ITOCF vs MARUY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MARUY trades at $224.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MARUY's competition here
ITOCF vs SSUMY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SSUMY trades at $27.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SSUMY's competition here
ITOCF vs SSUMF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SSUMF trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SSUMF's competition here
ITOCF vs PITAF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while PITAF trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check PITAF's competition here
ITOCF vs CKHUF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CKHUF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CKHUF's competition here
ITOCF vs CKHUY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CKHUY trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CKHUY's competition here
ITOCF vs TYHOF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check TYHOF's competition here
ITOCF vs HALMY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while HALMY trades at $90.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check HALMY's competition here
ITOCF vs JARLF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is 168.18. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check JARLF's competition here
ITOCF vs HLMAF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while HLMAF trades at $44.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check HLMAF's competition here
ITOCF vs JMHLY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while JMHLY trades at $55.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is 162.65. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check JMHLY's competition here
ITOCF vs GPOVY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check GPOVY's competition here
ITOCF vs GPOVF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while GPOVF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check GPOVF's competition here
ITOCF vs KPELY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KPELY trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KPELY's competition here
ITOCF vs KPELF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KPELF's competition here
ITOCF vs SWRAY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SWRAY trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 79.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SWRAY's competition here
ITOCF vs KHOLY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KHOLY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is 729.67. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KHOLY's competition here
ITOCF vs SWRBF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SWRBF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SWRBF's competition here
ITOCF vs SCRPF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SCRPF's competition here
ITOCF vs SWRAF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 74.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SWRAF's competition here
ITOCF vs SEIBF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SEIBF's competition here
ITOCF vs MYTHF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MYTHF's competition here
ITOCF vs MYTHY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MYTHY trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MYTHY's competition here
ITOCF vs SCVPF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SCVPF's competition here
ITOCF vs FCODF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while FCODF trades at $1,721.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 117.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check FCODF's competition here
ITOCF vs SKSUY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SKSUY's competition here
ITOCF vs HYUHF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check HYUHF's competition here
ITOCF vs AYYLF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check AYYLF's competition here
ITOCF vs AYALY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while AYALY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check AYALY's competition here
ITOCF vs FOSUY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while FOSUY trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check FOSUY's competition here
ITOCF vs AKAAF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while AKAAF trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check AKAAF's competition here
ITOCF vs BJINF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BJINF's competition here
ITOCF vs JGSHF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check JGSHF's competition here
ITOCF vs BDVSY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BDVSY trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BDVSY's competition here
ITOCF vs SZHFF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SZHFF's competition here
ITOCF vs BDVSF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BDVSF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BDVSF's competition here
ITOCF vs KHEXF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KHEXF's competition here
ITOCF vs KTERF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KTERF's competition here
ITOCF vs ALFFF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check ALFFF's competition here
ITOCF vs FOSUF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check FOSUF's competition here
ITOCF vs KINUF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KINUF's competition here
ITOCF vs KBDCY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KBDCY's competition here
ITOCF vs NARRF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check NARRF's competition here
ITOCF vs MMSMY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MMSMY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MMSMY's competition here
ITOCF vs GULRF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check GULRF's competition here
ITOCF vs KBDCF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KBDCF's competition here
ITOCF vs SMGBF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SMGBF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SMGBF's competition here
ITOCF vs BLJZY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BLJZY's competition here
ITOCF vs GULRY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check GULRY's competition here
ITOCF vs IWTNF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check IWTNF's competition here
ITOCF vs SWRBY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SWRBY's competition here
ITOCF vs SGHIF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SGHIF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SGHIF's competition here
ITOCF vs TINLF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check TINLF's competition here
ITOCF vs TINLY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while TINLY trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check TINLY's competition here
ITOCF vs SGHIY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SGHIY's competition here
ITOCF vs NLTBF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check NLTBF's competition here
ITOCF vs NICFF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check NICFF's competition here
ITOCF vs MPCFF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MPCFF's competition here
ITOCF vs CHCLY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CHCLY trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CHCLY's competition here
ITOCF vs XZJCF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check XZJCF's competition here
ITOCF vs GRGCF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while GRGCF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check GRGCF's competition here
ITOCF vs BNHUF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BNHUF's competition here
ITOCF vs ALGGY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while ALGGY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check ALGGY's competition here
ITOCF vs NSHBY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while NSHBY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check NSHBY's competition here
ITOCF vs ALGGF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check ALGGF's competition here
ITOCF vs BRYAF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BRYAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BRYAF's competition here
ITOCF vs SHMWF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 780.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SHMWF trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SHMWF's competition here
ITOCF vs MTLZF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check MTLZF's competition here
ITOCF vs INDHF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check INDHF's competition here
ITOCF vs KKRAF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check KKRAF's competition here
ITOCF vs SBOX Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check SBOX's competition here
ITOCF vs CVVIF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 435.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CVVIF's competition here
ITOCF vs BEVFF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BEVFF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BEVFF's competition here
ITOCF vs THAFF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while THAFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check THAFF's competition here
ITOCF vs CEEIF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CEEIF's competition here
ITOCF vs TJSCF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check TJSCF's competition here
ITOCF vs HGRVF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check HGRVF's competition here
ITOCF vs DMCHY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check DMCHY's competition here
ITOCF vs YMAIF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check YMAIF's competition here
ITOCF vs JGSMY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check JGSMY's competition here
ITOCF vs ICBT Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check ICBT's competition here
ITOCF vs NOBGF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check NOBGF's competition here
ITOCF vs RSDEF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check RSDEF's competition here
ITOCF vs APTL Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while APTL trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check APTL's competition here
ITOCF vs ECSL Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECSL's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check ECSL's competition here
ITOCF vs BNIGF Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check BNIGF's competition here
ITOCF vs CIBY Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while CIBY trades at $1,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -119.10. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check CIBY's competition here
ITOCF vs GTII Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while GTII trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check GTII's competition here
ITOCF vs PRTT Comparison August 2025
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 79.1B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $55.84, while PRTT trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.43, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -42.10. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.Check PRTT's competition here