ITOCHU Corporation
ITOCHU Corporation ITOCF Peers
See (ITOCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOCF | $52.07 | -0.94% | 74.4B | 12.47 | $4.21 | +2.59% |
| HTHIF | $31.29 | +5.89% | 135.5B | 33.63 | $0.88 | +0.99% |
| MSBHF | $19.90 | +2.58% | 77.4B | 12.08 | $1.61 | +4.68% |
| MTSUY | $19.82 | +2.69% | 77.3B | 12.07 | $1.61 | +2.81% |
| ITOCY | $103.56 | +1.87% | 72.8B | 12.07 | $8.51 | N/A |
| HTHIY | $30.07 | +3.05% | 68B | 33.65 | $0.88 | +0.70% |
| MITSF | $20.97 | +4.32% | 59.3B | 9.74 | $2.12 | +3.29% |
| MITSY | $412.00 | +2.59% | 58.5B | 9.62 | $41.94 | +2.36% |
| CTPCY | $6.54 | +0.00% | 40.7B | 5.11 | $1.37 | +5.21% |
| CTPCF | $1.38 | +0.00% | 34.9B | 4.44 | $0.27 | +6.41% |
Stock Comparison
ITOCF vs HTHIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while HTHIF trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MSBHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MSBHF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MTSUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MTSUY trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ITOCY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while ITOCY trades at $103.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HTHIY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while HTHIY trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MITSF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MITSF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MITSY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MITSY trades at $412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CTPCY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CTPCY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and CTPCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs CTPCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CTPCF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and CTPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs MARUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MARUY trades at $201.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MARUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MARUF trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SSUMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SSUMY trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SSUMF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SSUMF trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs CKHUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CKHUF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CKHUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CKHUY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SEIBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SEIBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs TYHOF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and TYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs PITAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while PITAF trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and PITAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs GPOVF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while GPOVF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and GPOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs HALMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while HALMY trades at $88.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HLMAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while HLMAF trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GPOVY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs JMHLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while JMHLY trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -33.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs JARLF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while JARLF trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and JARLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KPELY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KPELY trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SWRBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SWRBF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SWRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SWRAY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SWRAY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KHOLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KHOLY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -148.93. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KHOLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KPELF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KPELF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KPELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SWRAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SWRAF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SWRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs MYTHY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MYTHY trades at $53.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SCRPF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SCRPF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SCRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SKSUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SKSUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs JGSHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and JGSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs AYALY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while AYALY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs FCODF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while FCODF trades at $1,753.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 103.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and FCODF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs HYUHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and HYUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SCVPF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SCVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs AYYLF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and AYYLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs MYTHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MYTHF trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and MYTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs AKAAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while AKAAF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and AKAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BDVSY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BDVSY trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs FOSUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while FOSUY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and FOSUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SZHFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SZHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KHEXF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KHEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BDVSF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BDVSF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and BDVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs ALFFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and ALFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BJINF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BJINF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and BJINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KTERF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs FOSUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while FOSUF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and FOSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KINUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KINUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SMGBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SMGBF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SMGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KBDCY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KBDCY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KBDCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs GULRF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while GULRF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and GULRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BLJZY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and BLJZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KBDCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KBDCF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KBDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs GULRY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while GULRY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and GULRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs IWTNF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while IWTNF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and IWTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SWRBY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SWRBY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SWRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs MMSMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MMSMY trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs TINLF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and TINLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs XZJCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -25.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and XZJCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs NARRF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and NARRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SGHIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SGHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs TINLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while TINLY trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and TINLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SGHIY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SGHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs ALGGF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and ALGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs NICFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and NICFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs NLTBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and NLTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs MPCFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and MPCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs CHCLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CHCLY trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and CHCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs ALGGY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while ALGGY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and ALGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs GRGCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while GRGCF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and GRGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs ICBT Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 885.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and ICBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BRYAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 869.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BRYAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and BRYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs NSHBY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and NSHBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BNHUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 829.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and BNHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SHMWF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 793.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SHMWF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SHMWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs KKRAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and KKRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs MTLZF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and MTLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs INDHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 532.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while INDHF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and INDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SBOX Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CVVIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and CVVIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs BEVFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while BEVFF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and BEVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs THAFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and THAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs CEEIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and CEEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs TJSCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while TJSCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and TJSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs YMAIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while YMAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and YMAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs HGRVF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and HGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs DMCHY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while DMCHY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and DMCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs JGSMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while JGSMY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and JGSMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs NOBGF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and NOBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs APTL Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while APTL trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and APTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs RSDEF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and RSDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs ECSL Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GTII Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while GTII trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs PRTT Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while PRTT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and PRTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs CIBY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while CIBY trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -122.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and CIBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ITOCF vs SUNTF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 74.4B. In comparison, SUNTF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $52.07, while SUNTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SUNTF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF and SUNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).