ITOCHU Corporation
ITOCHU Corporation ITOCF Peers
See (ITOCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOCF | $53.46 | N/A | 75.8B | 12.40 | $4.31 | +2.59% |
| HTHIF | $27.55 | -0.36% | 126.1B | 28.70 | $0.96 | +1.06% |
| MSBHF | $20.49 | -0.77% | 81.5B | 12.42 | $1.65 | +3.27% |
| MTSUY | $20.22 | -1.80% | 80.5B | 12.33 | $1.64 | +2.65% |
| ITOCY | $104.15 | -1.85% | 73.9B | 12.17 | $8.56 | N/A |
| HTHIY | $27.48 | -1.33% | 62.9B | 29.55 | $0.93 | +2.11% |
| MITSF | $20.86 | +0.23% | 60B | 9.70 | $2.15 | +3.23% |
| MITSY | $413.50 | -0.31% | 59.4B | 9.64 | $42.89 | +1.28% |
| CTPCF | $1.22 | N/A | 35.5B | 4.52 | $0.27 | +0.77% |
| CTPCY | $5.85 | -2.50% | 34B | 4.27 | $1.37 | +6.24% |
Stock Comparison
ITOCF vs HTHIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, HTHIF has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while HTHIF trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas HTHIF's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HTHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MSBHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MSBHF has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MSBHF trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MSBHF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSBHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MSBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MTSUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MTSUY has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MTSUY trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MTSUY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTSUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MTSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ITOCY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, ITOCY has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while ITOCY trades at $104.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ITOCY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITOCY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ITOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HTHIY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, HTHIY has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while HTHIY trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas HTHIY's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTHIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HTHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MITSF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MITSF has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MITSF trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MITSF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MITSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MITSY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MITSY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MITSY trades at $413.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MITSY's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MITSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MITSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CTPCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CTPCF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CTPCF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CTPCF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTPCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CTPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CTPCY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CTPCY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CTPCY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CTPCY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTPCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to CTPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MARUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MARUY has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MARUY trades at $198.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MARUY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MARUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MARUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MARUF has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MARUF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MARUF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MARUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SSUMF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SSUMF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SSUMF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSUMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SSUMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SSUMY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SSUMY trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SSUMY's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSUMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SSUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs PITAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, PITAF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while PITAF trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PITAF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PITAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to PITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BLJZY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BLJZY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BLJZY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BLJZY's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLJZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to BLJZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CKHUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CKHUY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CKHUY trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CKHUY's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CKHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CKHUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CKHUF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CKHUF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CKHUF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKHUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CKHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs TYHOF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, TYHOF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while TYHOF trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TYHOF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TYHOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TYHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GPOVY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, GPOVY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while GPOVY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GPOVY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPOVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GPOVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GPOVF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, GPOVF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while GPOVF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GPOVF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPOVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GPOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HLMAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, HLMAF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while HLMAF trades at $39.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas HLMAF's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLMAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HLMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HALMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, HALMY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while HALMY trades at $79.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas HALMY's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HALMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HALMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KBDCY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KBDCY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KBDCY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KBDCY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBDCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KBDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs JMHLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, JMHLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while JMHLY trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas JMHLY's P/E ratio is -27.97. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JMHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to JMHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs JARLF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, JARLF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while JARLF trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas JARLF's P/E ratio is -26.84. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JARLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to JARLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SWRBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SWRBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SWRBF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SWRBF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SWRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SWRAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SWRAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SWRAF trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SWRAF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SWRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SWRAY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SWRAY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SWRAY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SWRAY's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SWRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KPELY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KPELY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KPELY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KPELY's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KPELY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to KPELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SCRPF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SCRPF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SCRPF trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SCRPF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCRPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SCRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KHOLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KHOLY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KHOLY trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KHOLY's P/E ratio is -131.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KHOLY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to KHOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KPELF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KPELF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KPELF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KPELF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KPELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to KPELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MYTHY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MYTHY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MYTHY trades at $53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MYTHY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYTHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MYTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MYTHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MYTHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MYTHF trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MYTHF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYTHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MYTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SKSUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SKSUY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SKSUY trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SKSUY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKSUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SKSUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SEIBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SEIBF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SEIBF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SEIBF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEIBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SEIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HYUHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, HYUHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while HYUHF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas HYUHF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYUHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to HYUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs AYYLF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, AYYLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while AYYLF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AYYLF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AYYLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to AYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs FCODF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, FCODF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while FCODF trades at $1,511.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FCODF's P/E ratio is 105.27. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCODF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to FCODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs AYALY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, AYALY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while AYALY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AYALY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AYALY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to AYALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SCVPF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SCVPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SCVPF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SCVPF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCVPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SCVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs JGSHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, JGSHF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while JGSHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas JGSHF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JGSHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to JGSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BDVSF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BDVSF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BDVSF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BDVSF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BDVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BDVSY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BDVSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BDVSY trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BDVSY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDVSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to BDVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SZHFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SZHFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SZHFF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SZHFF's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SZHFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SZHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KHEXF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KHEXF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KHEXF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KHEXF's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KHEXF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KHEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BJINF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BJINF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BJINF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BJINF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BJINF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to BJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs FOSUY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, FOSUY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while FOSUY trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FOSUY's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOSUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to FOSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ALFFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, ALFFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while ALFFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ALFFF's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALFFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ALFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KTERF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KTERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KTERF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KTERF's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTERF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs FOSUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, FOSUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while FOSUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas FOSUF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOSUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to FOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KINUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KINUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KINUF trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KINUF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KINUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to KINUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs AKAAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, AKAAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while AKAAF trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas AKAAF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to AKAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SMGBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SMGBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SMGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SMGBF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMGBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SMGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs JGSMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, JGSMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while JGSMY trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas JGSMY's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JGSMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to JGSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs NARRF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, NARRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while NARRF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NARRF's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NARRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to NARRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GULRY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, GULRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while GULRY trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GULRY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GULRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GULRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GULRF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, GULRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while GULRF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GULRF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GULRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to GULRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KBDCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KBDCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KBDCF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KBDCF's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBDCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SWRBY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SWRBY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SWRBY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SWRBY's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWRBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SWRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs IWTNF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, IWTNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while IWTNF trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas IWTNF's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IWTNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to IWTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MMSMY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MMSMY trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs TINLF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, TINLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while TINLF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TINLF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TINLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TINLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs NLTBF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, NLTBF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while NLTBF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NLTBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to NLTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SGHIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SGHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SGHIF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SGHIF's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGHIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SGHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SGHIY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SGHIY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SGHIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SGHIY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGHIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to SGHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs TINLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, TINLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while TINLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TINLY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TINLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to TINLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CHCLY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CHCLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CHCLY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CHCLY's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHCLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CHCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs NICFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, NICFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while NICFF trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NICFF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NICFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NICFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MPCFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MPCFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MPCFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MPCFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs XZJCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while XZJCF trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BNHUF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BNHUF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BNHUF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BNHUF's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNHUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BNHUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GRGCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, GRGCF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while GRGCF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GRGCF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GRGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ALGGY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, ALGGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while ALGGY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ALGGY's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALGGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to ALGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BRYAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BRYAF has a market cap of 879.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BRYAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BRYAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRYAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to BRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs NSHBY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, NSHBY has a market cap of 831.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while NSHBY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NSHBY's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSHBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to NSHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ALGGF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, ALGGF has a market cap of 723.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while ALGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ALGGF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALGGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ALGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs MTLZF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, MTLZF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while MTLZF trades at $1,525.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas MTLZF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTLZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to MTLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SHMWF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SHMWF has a market cap of 575.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SHMWF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SHMWF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SHMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs KKRAF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, KKRAF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while KKRAF trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas KKRAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KKRAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to KKRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs INDHF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, INDHF has a market cap of 532.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while INDHF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas INDHF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to INDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs SBOX Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, SBOX has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while SBOX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas SBOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBOX's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to SBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CVVIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CVVIF has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CVVIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CVVIF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVVIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CVVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BEVFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BEVFF has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BEVFF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BEVFF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BEVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to BEVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CEEIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CEEIF has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CEEIF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CEEIF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CEEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs TJSCF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, TJSCF has a market cap of 261.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while TJSCF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas TJSCF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TJSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to TJSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs HGRVF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, HGRVF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while HGRVF trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas HGRVF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGRVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to HGRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs DMCHY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, DMCHY has a market cap of 219.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while DMCHY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas DMCHY's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMCHY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to DMCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs THAFF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, THAFF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while THAFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas THAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THAFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to THAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs YMAIF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, YMAIF has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while YMAIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas YMAIF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YMAIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to YMAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ICBT Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, ICBT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while ICBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ICBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ICBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs NOBGF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, NOBGF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while NOBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas NOBGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOBGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to NOBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs RSDEF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, RSDEF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while RSDEF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas RSDEF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSDEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to RSDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs APTL Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, APTL has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while APTL trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas APTL's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is more volatile compared to APTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs PRTT Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, PRTT has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while PRTT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas PRTT's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRTT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to PRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs ECSL Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, ECSL has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while ECSL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas ECSL's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECSL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to ECSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs BNIGF Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, BNIGF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while BNIGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas BNIGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNIGF's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to BNIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs CIBY Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, CIBY has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while CIBY trades at $1,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas CIBY's P/E ratio is -118.42. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to CIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.
ITOCF vs GTII Comparison
ITOCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITOCF stands at 75.8B. In comparison, GTII has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITOCF is priced at $53.46, while GTII trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITOCF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.40, whereas GTII's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ITOCF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTII's ROE of -79.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITOCF is less volatile compared to GTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITOCF.