Independent Tankers Corporation Limited
Independent Tankers Corporation Limited (ITKSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITKSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITKSF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 0 | -0.05 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| AMKBF | $2,508.16 | +0.00% | 38.5B | 14.10 | $177.94 | +6.55% |
| AMKBY | $12.36 | +0.00% | 38.4B | 14.17 | $0.89 | +8.83% |
| AMKAF | $2,450.00 | +0.00% | 36.8B | 14.07 | $178.04 | +6.56% |
| CICOY | $8.98 | -0.11% | 28.6B | 4.02 | $2.28 | +10.50% |
| CICOF | $1.81 | +0.56% | 28.2B | 3.93 | $0.46 | +12.21% |
| HLAGF | $150.90 | +7.02% | 26.5B | 14.51 | $10.40 | +6.36% |
| ICTEF | $12.26 | +15.12% | 26.2B | 27.60 | $0.47 | +1.90% |
| HPGLY | $72.54 | +3.63% | 25.5B | 13.95 | $5.20 | +6.40% |
| CSDXF | $2.70 | +0.00% | 24.5B | 27.00 | $0.10 | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
ITKSF vs AMKBF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while AMKBF trades at $2,508.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and AMKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMKBF's competition here
ITKSF vs AMKBY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while AMKBY trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check AMKBY's competition here
ITKSF vs AMKAF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while AMKAF trades at $2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and AMKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMKAF's competition here
ITKSF vs CICOY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CICOY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check CICOY's competition here
ITKSF vs CICOF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CICOF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check CICOF's competition here
ITKSF vs HLAGF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HLAGF trades at $150.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HLAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLAGF's competition here
ITKSF vs ICTEF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while ICTEF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check ICTEF's competition here
ITKSF vs HPGLY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HPGLY trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check HPGLY's competition here
ITKSF vs CSDXF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CSDXF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CSDXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSDXF's competition here
ITKSF vs NPNYY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while NPNYY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check NPNYY's competition here
ITKSF vs NYUKF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while NYUKF trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and NYUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NYUKF's competition here
ITKSF vs MSLOY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while MSLOY trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check MSLOY's competition here
ITKSF vs OROVY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while OROVY trades at $87.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and OROVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OROVY's competition here
ITKSF vs SITIY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while SITIY trades at $41.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check SITIY's competition here
ITKSF vs MSLOF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while MSLOF trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and MSLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSLOF's competition here
ITKSF vs OROVF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while OROVF trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and OROVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OROVF's competition here
ITKSF vs SITIF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while SITIF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and SITIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SITIF's competition here
ITKSF vs KAIKY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while KAIKY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and KAIKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAIKY's competition here
ITKSF vs KAKKF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while KAKKF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and KAKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAKKF's competition here
ITKSF vs CMHHF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CMHHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CMHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMHHF's competition here
ITKSF vs CMHHY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CMHHY trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CMHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMHHY's competition here
ITKSF vs QNDPF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while QNDPF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and QNDPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QNDPF's competition here
ITKSF vs MIHDF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and MIHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIHDF's competition here
ITKSF vs DLPTF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while DLPTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and DLPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLPTF's competition here
ITKSF vs CITAF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CITAF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CITAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CITAF's competition here
ITKSF vs HAFNF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check HAFNF's competition here
ITKSF vs TDGMW Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while TDGMW trades at $77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and TDGMW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDGMW's competition here
ITKSF vs PTAUF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while PTAUF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check PTAUF's competition here
ITKSF vs CSPKF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CSPKF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CSPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSPKF's competition here
ITKSF vs CSPKY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CSPKY trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CSPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSPKY's competition here
ITKSF vs HFIAF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HFIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HFIAF's competition here
ITKSF vs HOEGF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HOEGF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check HOEGF's competition here
ITKSF vs PTAUY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and PTAUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTAUY's competition here
ITKSF vs CADLF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CADLF trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CADLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CADLF's competition here
ITKSF vs BWLLY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and BWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWLLY's competition here
ITKSF vs PCFBY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while PCFBY trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and PCFBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCFBY's competition here
ITKSF vs HHULY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HHULY trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HHULY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HHULY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HHULY's competition here
ITKSF vs CITAY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CITAY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CITAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CITAY's competition here
ITKSF vs BWLLF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and BWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWLLF's competition here
ITKSF vs SOIEF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while SOIEF trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and SOIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOIEF's competition here
ITKSF vs CKNHF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CKNHF trades at $57.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CKNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKNHF's competition here
ITKSF vs HCTPF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HCTPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HCTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCTPF's competition here
ITKSF vs WTSHF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while WTSHF trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check WTSHF's competition here
ITKSF vs PCFBF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while PCFBF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and PCFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCFBF's competition here
ITKSF vs HHULF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HHULF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HHULF's competition here
ITKSF vs CHDGF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while CHDGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and CHDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHDGF's competition here
ITKSF vs DPBSF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while DPBSF trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and DPBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DPBSF's competition here
ITKSF vs IRCUF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while IRCUF trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and IRCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRCUF's competition here
ITKSF vs MPZZF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 931.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while MPZZF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and MPZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPZZF's competition here
ITKSF vs OKENF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check OKENF's competition here
ITKSF vs DMCOF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 854.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while DMCOF trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and DMCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DMCOF's competition here
ITKSF vs SEMUF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 742.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while SEMUF trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and SEMUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEMUF's competition here
ITKSF vs AGMJF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 623.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while AGMJF trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and AGMJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGMJF's competition here
ITKSF vs LTKBF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and LTKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTKBF's competition here
ITKSF vs PSGFF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 619.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while PSGFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and PSGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGFF's competition here
ITKSF vs TJIPF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 492.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while TJIPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and TJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TJIPF's competition here
ITKSF vs TSMTF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and TSMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSMTF's competition here
ITKSF vs TTBKF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 300.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while TTBKF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and TTBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTBKF's competition here
ITKSF vs JMSFF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and JMSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMSFF's competition here
ITKSF vs SLOFF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLOFF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and SLOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLOFF's competition here
ITKSF vs MKOTF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and MKOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKOTF's competition here
ITKSF vs HSPPF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HSPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSPPF's competition here
ITKSF vs VKGLF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and VKGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VKGLF's competition here
ITKSF vs HUPHY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while HUPHY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and HUPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUPHY's competition here
ITKSF vs BSEAF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while BSEAF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and BSEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSEAF's competition here
ITKSF vs JNSTF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while JNSTF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and JNSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JNSTF's competition here
ITKSF vs WSSTF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while WSSTF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and WSSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WSSTF's competition here
ITKSF vs AWLNF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to AWLNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and AWLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWLNF's competition here
ITKSF vs GEOUF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while GEOUF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEOUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and GEOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEOUF's competition here
ITKSF vs GTMAY Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while GTMAY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and GTMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMAY's competition here
ITKSF vs ADCUF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and ADCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCUF's competition here
ITKSF vs ASCJF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF is less volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITKSF.Check ASCJF's competition here
ITKSF vs SEAOF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 125.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and SEAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEAOF's competition here
ITKSF vs BBLKF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and BBLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBLKF's competition here
ITKSF vs ULTRF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and ULTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULTRF's competition here
ITKSF vs TEUFF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TEUFF's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and TEUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEUFF's competition here
ITKSF vs WLOLQ Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and WLOLQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLOLQ's competition here
ITKSF vs PRGNF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and PRGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRGNF's competition here
ITKSF vs TEUCF Comparison February 2026
ITKSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITKSF stands at 0. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 146. Regarding current trading prices, ITKSF is priced at $0.00, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITKSF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITKSF's ROE is N/A, compared to TEUCF's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ITKSF and TEUCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEUCF's competition here