iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITB | $110.15 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 16.14 | $6.59 | +1.52% |
| VTSAX | $165.10 | +0.83% | 2.1T | 26.87 | $6.15 | +1.10% |
| VITSX | $165.12 | +0.82% | 2.1T | 26.86 | $6.15 | +1.32% |
| PMFLX | $10.26 | +0.00% | 2T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OAKI | $26.95 | +0.02% | 1.6T | N/A | N/A | +0.04% |
| VOO | $632.21 | +0.00% | 1.5T | 27.94 | $22.81 | +1.11% |
| VFFSX | $337.79 | +0.77% | 1.5T | 27.72 | $12.19 | N/A |
| VFINX | $637.05 | +0.77% | 1.5T | 27.71 | $22.99 | +1.19% |
| BCTK | $24.67 | -0.06% | 1.2T | 44.12 | $0.57 | N/A |
| FXAIX | $239.69 | +0.77% | 758.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ITB vs VTSAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTSAX trades at $165.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTSAX's competition here
ITB vs VITSX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VITSX trades at $165.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VITSX's competition here
ITB vs PMFLX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PMFLX has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while PMFLX trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PMFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to PMFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check PMFLX's competition here
ITB vs OAKI Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OAKI has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while OAKI trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas OAKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OAKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to OAKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check OAKI's competition here
ITB vs VOO Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VOO trades at $632.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VOO's competition here
ITB vs VFFSX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VFFSX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VFFSX trades at $337.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VFFSX's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VFFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VFFSX's competition here
ITB vs VFINX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VFINX trades at $637.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VFINX's competition here
ITB vs BCTK Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BCTK has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while BCTK trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BCTK's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to BCTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check BCTK's competition here
ITB vs FXAIX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 758.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FXAIX trades at $239.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FXAIX's competition here
ITB vs IVV Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 758.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while IVV trades at $690.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check IVV's competition here
ITB vs SPY Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 703.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while SPY trades at $687.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check SPY's competition here
ITB vs VXUS Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 613.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VXUS trades at $83.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VXUS's competition here
ITB vs VTIAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTIAX has a market cap of 610.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTIAX trades at $44.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTIAX's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTIAX's competition here
ITB vs VTSNX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 610.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTSNX trades at $179.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTSNX's competition here
ITB vs VTPSX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTPSX has a market cap of 610.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTPSX trades at $179.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTPSX's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTPSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTPSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTPSX's competition here
ITB vs VTI Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 585.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTI trades at $339.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTI's competition here
ITB vs BMOP Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BMOP has a market cap of 442.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while BMOP trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BMOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to BMOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check BMOP's competition here
ITB vs QQQ Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 417B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while QQQ trades at $607.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check QQQ's competition here
ITB vs LACG Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LACG has a market cap of 371.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while LACG trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas LACG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LACG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to LACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check LACG's competition here
ITB vs VUG Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 353.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VUG trades at $463.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VUG's competition here
ITB vs VIGAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VIGAX has a market cap of 353.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VIGAX trades at $238.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VIGAX's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIGAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VIGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VIGAX's competition here
ITB vs VIIIX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 341.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VIIIX trades at $556.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VIIIX's competition here
ITB vs VINIX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 338.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VINIX trades at $556.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VINIX's competition here
ITB vs VEA Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 290.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VEA trades at $69.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VEA's competition here
ITB vs VDIPX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VDIPX trades at $34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VDIPX's competition here
ITB vs VTMGX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTMGX has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTMGX trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTMGX's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMGX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTMGX's competition here
ITB vs VTMNX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTMNX trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTMNX's competition here
ITB vs RGAGX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 280.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RGAGX trades at $79.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RGAGX's competition here
ITB vs GAFFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 279.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while GAFFX trades at $79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check GAFFX's competition here
ITB vs AGTHX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 279.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AGTHX trades at $78.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AGTHX's competition here
ITB vs GFFFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GFFFX has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while GFFFX trades at $78.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GFFFX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to GFFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check GFFFX's competition here
ITB vs GFAFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 276.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while GFAFX trades at $78.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check GFAFX's competition here
ITB vs AFMBX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 276.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AFMBX trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AFMBX's competition here
ITB vs RLBGX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 276.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RLBGX trades at $39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RLBGX's competition here
ITB vs ABALX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while ABALX trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check ABALX's competition here
ITB vs BALFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while BALFX trades at $38.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check BALFX's competition here
ITB vs AMBFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AMBFX trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AMBFX's competition here
ITB vs RGABX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 244.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RGABX trades at $69.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RGABX's competition here
ITB vs RGAAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 240B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RGAAX trades at $67.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RGAAX's competition here
ITB vs GFACX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 233.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while GFACX trades at $65.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check GFACX's competition here
ITB vs VTV Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTV trades at $206.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTV's competition here
ITB vs ODIDX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ODIDX has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while ODIDX trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ODIDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODIDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to ODIDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check ODIDX's competition here
ITB vs FCTDX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FCTDX trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FCTDX's competition here
ITB vs GRAG Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GRAG has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while GRAG trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GRAG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to GRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check GRAG's competition here
ITB vs VMCIX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VMCIX has a market cap of 205.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VMCIX trades at $83.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VMCIX's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VMCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VMCIX's competition here
ITB vs VMCPX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 205.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VMCPX trades at $409.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VMCPX's competition here
ITB vs VIMAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 205.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VIMAX trades at $375.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VIMAX's competition here
ITB vs VO Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VO trades at $303.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VO's competition here
ITB vs MER-PK Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MER-PK has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while MER-PK trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MER-PK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MER-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to MER-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check MER-PK's competition here
ITB vs GLD Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLD has a market cap of 179.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while GLD trades at $474.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GLD's P/E ratio is -50.40. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to GLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check GLD's competition here
ITB vs AICCX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AICCX trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AICCX's competition here
ITB vs RICAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RICAX trades at $62.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RICAX's competition here
ITB vs AICFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AICFX trades at $63.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AICFX's competition here
ITB vs RICBX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RICBX trades at $62.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RICBX's competition here
ITB vs AIVSX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AIVSX trades at $63.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AIVSX's competition here
ITB vs FCNKX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 176.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FCNKX trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FCNKX's competition here
ITB vs FCNTX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FCNTX trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FCNTX's competition here
ITB vs IEFA Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 174.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while IEFA trades at $97.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check IEFA's competition here
ITB vs C-PN Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while C-PN trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check C-PN's competition here
ITB vs VB Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VB trades at $277.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VB's competition here
ITB vs VSCIX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 170.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VSCIX trades at $132.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VSCIX's competition here
ITB vs BLK Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while BLK trades at $1,081.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check BLK's competition here
ITB vs ANWPX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while ANWPX trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check ANWPX's competition here
ITB vs FINFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FINFX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FINFX trades at $95.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FINFX's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FINFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FINFX's competition here
ITB vs RFNCX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RFNCX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RFNCX trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RFNCX's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RFNCX's competition here
ITB vs AFIFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AFIFX trades at $95.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AFIFX's competition here
ITB vs ANCFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while ANCFX trades at $95.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check ANCFX's competition here
ITB vs CFNAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while CFNAX trades at $95.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check CFNAX's competition here
ITB vs FNPFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FNPFX trades at $72.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FNPFX's competition here
ITB vs NPFFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while NPFFX trades at $71.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check NPFFX's competition here
ITB vs RNPGX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RNPGX trades at $72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RNPGX's competition here
ITB vs RNPCX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RNPCX has a market cap of 165.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RNPCX trades at $69.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RNPCX's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNPCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RNPCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RNPCX's competition here
ITB vs FPMAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FPMAX has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FPMAX trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FPMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FPMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FPMAX's competition here
ITB vs VWO Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VWO has a market cap of 154.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VWO trades at $58.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VWO's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VWO's competition here
ITB vs VEMAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VEMAX trades at $48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VEMAX's competition here
ITB vs AWSHX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 150.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AWSHX trades at $66.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AWSHX's competition here
ITB vs RWMFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RWMFX trades at $66.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RWMFX's competition here
ITB vs FWMIX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FWMIX trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FWMIX's competition here
ITB vs CWMAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while CWMAX trades at $66.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check CWMAX's competition here
ITB vs WSHFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while WSHFX trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check WSHFX's competition here
ITB vs WGIFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WGIFX has a market cap of 147.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while WGIFX trades at $75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas WGIFX's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to WGIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check WGIFX's competition here
ITB vs WSHCX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while WSHCX trades at $65.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check WSHCX's competition here
ITB vs RWMBX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RWMBX trades at $65.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RWMBX's competition here
ITB vs BX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while BX trades at $116.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check BX's competition here
ITB vs IEMG Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IEMG has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while IEMG trades at $76.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IEMG's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to IEMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check IEMG's competition here
ITB vs AEPFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AEPFX trades at $64.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AEPFX's competition here
ITB vs RERHX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RERHX trades at $64.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RERHX's competition here
ITB vs AEGFX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AEGFX trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AEGFX's competition here
ITB vs AGG Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AGG trades at $101.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 128.88. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AGG's competition here
ITB vs RERGX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while RERGX trades at $64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check RERGX's competition here
ITB vs AEPGX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while AEPGX trades at $64.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check AEPGX's competition here
ITB vs SWPPX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SWPPX has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while SWPPX trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SWPPX's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWPPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to SWPPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check SWPPX's competition here
ITB vs VGT Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VGT trades at $737.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VGT's competition here
ITB vs VITAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VITAX trades at $377.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VITAX's competition here
ITB vs IWF Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while IWF trades at $452.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check IWF's competition here
ITB vs NAESX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while NAESX trades at $132.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check NAESX's competition here
ITB vs FSKAX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while FSKAX trades at $188.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check FSKAX's competition here
ITB vs VTTHX Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VTTHX trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VTTHX's competition here
ITB vs VIG Comparison February 2026
ITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITB is priced at $110.15, while VIG trades at $226.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, ITB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITB is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITB.Check VIG's competition here