1mage Software, Inc.
1mage Software, Inc. (ISOL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ISOL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISOL | $0.00 | +0.00% | 661 | -0.02 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,694.12 | -0.30% | 53.4B | 48.68 | $34.80 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $16.75 | -0.36% | 52.7B | 49.25 | $0.34 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $72.53 | +0.00% | 45.5B | 17.60 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +3.94% |
| TOITF | $134.35 | -4.04% | 11.2B | 75.48 | $1.78 | N/A |
| TMICF | $65.49 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 39.22 | $1.67 | +3.57% |
| TMICY | $62.19 | +1.19% | 8.2B | 37.65 | $1.65 | +1.53% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.76% |
| NEXXY | $6.00 | -0.99% | 7.4B | 37.50 | $0.16 | +4.72% |
Stock Comparison
ISOL vs ADYYF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,694.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check ADYYF's competition here
ISOL vs ADYEY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 49.25. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check ADYEY's competition here
ISOL vs BSQKZ Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $72.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check BSQKZ's competition here
ISOL vs KAKZF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check KAKZF's competition here
ISOL vs TOITF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 75.48. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TOITF's competition here
ISOL vs TMICF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TMICF's competition here
ISOL vs TMICY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $62.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TMICY's competition here
ISOL vs NEXPF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check NEXPF's competition here
ISOL vs NEXXY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check NEXXY's competition here
ISOL vs DRKTY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DRKTY's competition here
ISOL vs GMYTF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check GMYTF's competition here
ISOL vs SWDAF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SWDAF's competition here
ISOL vs STWRY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check STWRY's competition here
ISOL vs CIOXY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CIOXY's competition here
ISOL vs EXNWF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check EXNWF's competition here
ISOL vs DRKTF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DRKTF's competition here
ISOL vs OVHFF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 132.11. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check OVHFF's competition here
ISOL vs SPNUF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SPNUF's competition here
ISOL vs WWLNF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check WWLNF's competition here
ISOL vs SANP Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SANP's competition here
ISOL vs MGPPF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.67. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check MGPPF's competition here
ISOL vs WRDLY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check WRDLY's competition here
ISOL vs PHPYF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PHPYF's competition here
ISOL vs YHEKF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check YHEKF's competition here
ISOL vs CPLFF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CPLFF's competition here
ISOL vs PYPTF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 655.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PYPTF's competition here
ISOL vs FNCHF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FNCHF's competition here
ISOL vs PRTHU Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PRTHU's competition here
ISOL vs DYNDF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 528.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DYNDF's competition here
ISOL vs FMZNF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 489.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -18.49. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FMZNF's competition here
ISOL vs TDCSF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TDCSF's competition here
ISOL vs SPMYY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SPMYY's competition here
ISOL vs NFONF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check NFONF's competition here
ISOL vs CORZQ Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CORZQ's competition here
ISOL vs TYPMF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TYPMF's competition here
ISOL vs ABANF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check ABANF's competition here
ISOL vs OTPMF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check OTPMF's competition here
ISOL vs SERKF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SERKF's competition here
ISOL vs FFPP Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FFPP's competition here
ISOL vs HISNF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check HISNF's competition here
ISOL vs SEEMF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SEEMF's competition here
ISOL vs FSOYF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FSOYF's competition here
ISOL vs ERDLF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check ERDLF's competition here
ISOL vs GIVXF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check GIVXF's competition here
ISOL vs CGAAY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CGAAY's competition here
ISOL vs PYFRF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PYFRF's competition here
ISOL vs FCLOF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FCLOF's competition here
ISOL vs HAIVF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -111.67. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check HAIVF's competition here
ISOL vs BGOPF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -21.60. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check BGOPF's competition here
ISOL vs DGGXF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DGGXF's competition here
ISOL vs CROTF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CROTF's competition here
ISOL vs JGHG Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check JGHG's competition here
ISOL vs WHEN Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check WHEN's competition here
ISOL vs VRSSF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check VRSSF's competition here
ISOL vs QBITF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check QBITF's competition here
ISOL vs NTTCF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check NTTCF's competition here
ISOL vs APGT Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check APGT's competition here
ISOL vs NOWVF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check NOWVF's competition here
ISOL vs SKKY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SKKY's competition here
ISOL vs CORZR Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CORZR's competition here
ISOL vs ISDCF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check ISDCF's competition here
ISOL vs TFLM Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +23.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TFLM's competition here
ISOL vs CLOQ Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CLOQ's competition here
ISOL vs POTTF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check POTTF's competition here
ISOL vs SDCH Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SDCH's competition here
ISOL vs CLPMF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CLPMF's competition here
ISOL vs SFIIF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SFIIF's competition here
ISOL vs CYBNY Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check CYBNY's competition here
ISOL vs PLCKF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +10.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PLCKF's competition here
ISOL vs QFEEF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check QFEEF's competition here
ISOL vs EPXGF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check EPXGF's competition here
ISOL vs DLTXF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DLTXF's competition here
ISOL vs DSAIF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DSAIF's competition here
ISOL vs IPNFF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check IPNFF's competition here
ISOL vs FOBIF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FOBIF's competition here
ISOL vs DVPNF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DVPNF's competition here
ISOL vs NBVAF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check NBVAF's competition here
ISOL vs VENZF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check VENZF's competition here
ISOL vs RKNEF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check RKNEF's competition here
ISOL vs TGCB Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TGCB's competition here
ISOL vs PKLBF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PKLBF's competition here
ISOL vs MODGF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check MODGF's competition here
ISOL vs DRKOF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check DRKOF's competition here
ISOL vs SCYRF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SCYRF's competition here
ISOL vs OVTZ Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check OVTZ's competition here
ISOL vs PKKFF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check PKKFF's competition here
ISOL vs VISM Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check VISM's competition here
ISOL vs RIHT Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check RIHT's competition here
ISOL vs MBLMF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check MBLMF's competition here
ISOL vs KCRD Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check KCRD's competition here
ISOL vs RCWDF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check RCWDF's competition here
ISOL vs INOTF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check INOTF's competition here
ISOL vs TONR Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 781.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check TONR's competition here
ISOL vs INAR Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check INAR's competition here
ISOL vs ITNF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 693.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while ITNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check ITNF's competition here
ISOL vs FSRDQ Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FSRDQ's competition here
ISOL vs SMKG Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 670.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SMKG's competition here
ISOL vs FUAPF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 641.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check FUAPF's competition here
ISOL vs SLXXF Comparison August 2025
ISOL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISOL stands at 661. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 632.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ISOL is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISOL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ISOL's ROE is -4.26%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of +6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ISOL is more volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISOL.Check SLXXF's competition here