IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited
IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited (IRB.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRB.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Infrastructure Operations Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRB.NS | ₹21.61 | +5.57% | 267.4B | 34.59 | ₹0.64 | +0.47% |
| IRB.BO | ₹21.67 | -47.07% | 267B | 35.10 | ₹0.63 | +0.47% |
| GMRP&UI.NS | ₹98.35 | +1.39% | 70.1B | 7.62 | ₹11.78 | N/A |
| IRBINVIT.NS | ₹60.10 | +1.08% | 34.8B | 9.50 | ₹6.32 | +11.66% |
| MARKOLINES.NS | ₹145.55 | +2.41% | 3.1B | 11.68 | ₹12.15 | +1.06% |
| HILINFRA.NS | ₹46.29 | +5.73% | 2.9B | 8.37 | ₹4.90 | N/A |
| HILINFRA.BO | ₹46.17 | +5.46% | 2.9B | 8.37 | ₹4.90 | N/A |
| ATLANTAA.NS | ₹35.79 | +6.33% | 2.6B | -18.77 | -₹1.72 | N/A |
| ATLANTAA.BO | ₹35.79 | +6.84% | 2.6B | -18.48 | -₹1.72 | N/A |
| ATLANTA.NS | ₹24.50 | +4.93% | 2.1B | -6.88 | -₹3.56 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IRB.NS vs IRB.BO Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, IRB.BO has a market cap of 267B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while IRB.BO trades at ₹21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas IRB.BO's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to IRB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check IRB.BO's competition here
IRB.NS vs GMRP&UI.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, GMRP&UI.NS has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while GMRP&UI.NS trades at ₹98.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas GMRP&UI.NS's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMRP&UI.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to GMRP&UI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check GMRP&UI.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs IRBINVIT.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, IRBINVIT.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while IRBINVIT.NS trades at ₹60.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas IRBINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRBINVIT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to IRBINVIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check IRBINVIT.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs MARKOLINES.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, MARKOLINES.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while MARKOLINES.NS trades at ₹145.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas MARKOLINES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MARKOLINES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to MARKOLINES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check MARKOLINES.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs HILINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, HILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while HILINFRA.NS trades at ₹46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas HILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to HILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check HILINFRA.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs HILINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, HILINFRA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while HILINFRA.BO trades at ₹46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas HILINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HILINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to HILINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check HILINFRA.BO's competition here
IRB.NS vs ATLANTAA.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, ATLANTAA.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while ATLANTAA.NS trades at ₹35.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas ATLANTAA.NS's P/E ratio is -18.77. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLANTAA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to ATLANTAA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check ATLANTAA.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs ATLANTAA.BO Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, ATLANTAA.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while ATLANTAA.BO trades at ₹35.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas ATLANTAA.BO's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLANTAA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to ATLANTAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check ATLANTAA.BO's competition here
IRB.NS vs ATLANTA.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, ATLANTA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while ATLANTA.NS trades at ₹24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas ATLANTA.NS's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATLANTA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to ATLANTA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check ATLANTA.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs JPINFRATEC.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, JPINFRATEC.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while JPINFRATEC.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas JPINFRATEC.NS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPINFRATEC.NS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to JPINFRATEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check JPINFRATEC.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs BRNL.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, BRNL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while BRNL.NS trades at ₹18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas BRNL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRNL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to BRNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check BRNL.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs BRNL.BO Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, BRNL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while BRNL.BO trades at ₹18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas BRNL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRNL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to BRNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check BRNL.BO's competition here
IRB.NS vs ARSSINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, ARSSINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while ARSSINFRA.NS trades at ₹54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas ARSSINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARSSINFRA.NS's ROE of -12.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to ARSSINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check ARSSINFRA.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs AJRINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, AJRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 659.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while AJRINFRA.NS trades at ₹0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas AJRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AJRINFRA.NS's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to AJRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check AJRINFRA.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs IL&FSTRANS.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, IL&FSTRANS.NS has a market cap of 605.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while IL&FSTRANS.NS trades at ₹1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas IL&FSTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IL&FSTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to IL&FSTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check IL&FSTRANS.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs NOIDATOLL.BO Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, NOIDATOLL.BO has a market cap of 545.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while NOIDATOLL.BO trades at ₹3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas NOIDATOLL.BO's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOIDATOLL.BO's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to NOIDATOLL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check NOIDATOLL.BO's competition here
IRB.NS vs NOIDATOLL.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, NOIDATOLL.NS has a market cap of 543.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while NOIDATOLL.NS trades at ₹3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas NOIDATOLL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is less volatile compared to NOIDATOLL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check NOIDATOLL.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs GAYAHWS.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, GAYAHWS.NS has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while GAYAHWS.NS trades at ₹2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas GAYAHWS.NS's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GAYAHWS.NS's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to GAYAHWS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check GAYAHWS.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs MEP.BO Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, MEP.BO has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while MEP.BO trades at ₹0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas MEP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEP.BO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to MEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check MEP.BO's competition here
IRB.NS vs MEP.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, MEP.NS has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while MEP.NS trades at ₹0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas MEP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEP.NS's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to MEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check MEP.NS's competition here
IRB.NS vs GAMMNINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
IRB.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRB.NS stands at 267.4B. In comparison, GAMMNINFRA.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRB.NS is priced at ₹21.61, while GAMMNINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRB.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 34.59, whereas GAMMNINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, IRB.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GAMMNINFRA.NS's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IRB.NS is more volatile compared to GAMMNINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRB.NS.Check GAMMNINFRA.NS's competition here