Indianapolis Power & Light Company PFD 4.80% CDT
Indianapolis Power & Light Company PFD 4.80% CDT (IPWLN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPWLN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPWLN | $85.50 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NGGTF | $14.04 | -2.39% | 72.7B | 18.31 | $0.80 | +4.20% |
| ELEZF | $29.71 | -1.13% | 31.4B | 12.33 | $2.41 | +4.28% |
| ELEZY | $14.73 | +0.14% | 31.1B | 12.25 | $1.20 | +3.97% |
| NSARO | $78.00 | +0.00% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.13% |
| AILIO | $69.98 | +0.00% | 27.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.78% |
| AILIP | $69.00 | +0.00% | 27.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.78% |
| NSARP | $70.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.13% |
| CLPHY | $8.67 | +1.29% | 21.7B | 14.56 | $0.59 | +4.40% |
| HRNNF | $35.66 | +0.91% | 21.4B | 23.92 | $1.49 | +2.57% |
Stock Comparison
IPWLN vs NGGTF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while NGGTF trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check NGGTF's competition here
IPWLN vs ELEZF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ELEZF trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and ELEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEZF's competition here
IPWLN vs ELEZY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ELEZY trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check ELEZY's competition here
IPWLN vs NSARO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while NSARO trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and NSARO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARO's competition here
IPWLN vs AILIO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while AILIO trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and AILIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIO's competition here
IPWLN vs AILIP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while AILIP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check AILIP's competition here
IPWLN vs NSARP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while NSARP trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSARP's competition here
IPWLN vs CLPHY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CLPHY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CLPHY's competition here
IPWLN vs HRNNF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HRNNF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and HRNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRNNF's competition here
IPWLN vs TNABY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while TNABY trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check TNABY's competition here
IPWLN vs TERRF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while TERRF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check TERRF's competition here
IPWLN vs CLPHF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CLPHF trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPHF's competition here
IPWLN vs TEZNY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while TEZNY trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check TEZNY's competition here
IPWLN vs TNABF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while TNABF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and TNABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNABF's competition here
IPWLN vs CKISF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CKISF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CKISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKISF's competition here
IPWLN vs CKISY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CKISY trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CKISY's competition here
IPWLN vs EMRAF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EMRAF trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check EMRAF's competition here
IPWLN vs ELIAF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ELIAF trades at $121.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check ELIAF's competition here
IPWLN vs RDEIY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while RDEIY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check RDEIY's competition here
IPWLN vs MAEOY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while MAEOY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check MAEOY's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPCO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPCO trades at $94.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and UEPCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCO's competition here
IPWLN vs FTRSF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while FTRSF trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and FTRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTRSF's competition here
IPWLN vs HPIFF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIFF's competition here
IPWLN vs EQUEY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EQUEY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and EQUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQUEY's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPCN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCN's competition here
IPWLN vs HPIFY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HPIFY's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPEO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPEO trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check UEPEO's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPEP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPEP trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check UEPEP's competition here
IPWLN vs FORFF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while FORFF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and FORFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORFF's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPCP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPCP trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and UEPCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPCP's competition here
IPWLN vs HKVTY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HKVTY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and HKVTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKVTY's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPEM Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPEM trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check UEPEM's competition here
IPWLN vs ABZPF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ABZPF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check ABZPF's competition here
IPWLN vs EGIEY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EGIEY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check EGIEY's competition here
IPWLN vs UEPEN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while UEPEN trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and UEPEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UEPEN's competition here
IPWLN vs HKCVF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKCVF's competition here
IPWLN vs IESFY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while IESFY trades at $116.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and IESFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IESFY's competition here
IPWLN vs CPWIF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CPWIF's competition here
IPWLN vs PGPKY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while PGPKY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check PGPKY's competition here
IPWLN vs WELPM Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPM's competition here
IPWLN vs ABOIF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ABOIF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check ABOIF's competition here
IPWLN vs WELPP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while WELPP trades at $65.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WELPP's competition here
IPWLN vs AILLM Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while AILLM trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLM's competition here
IPWLN vs AILLN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while AILLN trades at $78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and AILLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILLN's competition here
IPWLN vs AILIN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while AILIN trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and AILIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AILIN's competition here
IPWLN vs RGPCF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while RGPCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check RGPCF's competition here
IPWLN vs AILLP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while AILLP trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check AILLP's competition here
IPWLN vs FPHHF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPHHF's competition here
IPWLN vs CUPUF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CUPUF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CUPUF's competition here
IPWLN vs RELFF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RELFF's competition here
IPWLN vs ABTZY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ABTZY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABTZY's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLPL Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLPL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPL's competition here
IPWLN vs CNTHP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNTHP trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CNTHP's competition here
IPWLN vs CNTHO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNTHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTHO's competition here
IPWLN vs CNTHN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNTHN trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CNTHN's competition here
IPWLN vs ABZPY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ABZPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check ABZPY's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLTP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLTP trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNLTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTP's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLHP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLHP trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CNLHP's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLHO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 217.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLHO trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNLHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHO's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLPM Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLPM trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLPM's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLHN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLHN trades at $32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLHN's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLTN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLTN trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check CNLTN's competition here
IPWLN vs CNLTL Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while CNLTL trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNLTL's competition here
IPWLN vs EDCFF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EDCFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and EDCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDCFF's competition here
IPWLN vs NZWFF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZWFF's competition here
IPWLN vs SUME Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while SUME trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUME's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and SUME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUME's competition here
IPWLN vs MCPB Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and MCPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCPB's competition here
IPWLN vs EUSP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 822.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EUSP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check EUSP's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWEM Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HAWEM's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWLL Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWLL trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HAWLL's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWLN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWLN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HAWLN's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWEN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 755.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWEN trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HAWEN's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWEL Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWEL trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HAWEL's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWLI Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWLI trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check HAWLI's competition here
IPWLN vs HAWLM Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while HAWLM trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAWLM's competition here
IPWLN vs RIGH Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check RIGH's competition here
IPWLN vs USWF Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USWF's competition here
IPWLN vs RENU Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check RENU's competition here
IPWLN vs EPGRQ Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 16. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGRQ's competition here
IPWLN vs IPWLP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLP's competition here
IPWLN vs ENIAY Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check ENIAY's competition here
IPWLN vs BANGN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BANGN's competition here
IPWLN vs EVSO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPWLN.Check EVSO's competition here
IPWLN vs PNMXO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while PNMXO trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and PNMXO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNMXO's competition here
IPWLN vs IPWLG Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLG's competition here
IPWLN vs NMPWP Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while NMPWP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and NMPWP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPWP's competition here
IPWLN vs IPWLO Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPWLO's competition here
IPWLN vs NEWEN Comparison July 2025
IPWLN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPWLN stands at 0. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPWLN is priced at $85.50, while NEWEN trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPWLN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPWLN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPWLN and NEWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWEN's competition here