Imperial Metals Corporation
Imperial Metals Corporation IPMLF Peers
See (IPMLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPMLF | $2.75 | +4.17% | 445.15M | -15.28 | -$0.18 | N/A |
ANFGF | $24.86 | -0.34% | 24.51B | 29.60 | $0.84 | +1.27% |
FQVLF | $14.38 | -2.04% | 11.91B | 79.89 | $0.18 | N/A |
JIAXF | $1.70 | +7.59% | 8.48B | 5.86 | $0.29 | +4.96% |
LUNMF | $9.11 | +0.22% | 7.91B | 75.92 | $0.12 | +3.13% |
AIAGY | $42.98 | N/A | 7.51B | 5.40 | $7.96 | +1.11% |
KGHPF | $32.15 | N/A | 6.43B | 8.44 | $3.81 | +0.61% |
OZMLF | $19.00 | N/A | 6.41B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
MMLTF | $0.35 | N/A | 4.23B | 17.42 | $0.02 | N/A |
AIAGF | $90.00 | +3.02% | 3.93B | 5.65 | $15.92 | +1.83% |
Stock Comparison
IPMLF vs ANFGF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 24.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ANFGF trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and ANFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs FQVLF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 11.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while FQVLF trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 79.89. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs JIAXF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while JIAXF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and JIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs LUNMF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while LUNMF trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 75.92. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs AIAGY Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while AIAGY trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs KGHPF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while KGHPF trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs OZMLF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and OZMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs MMLTF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while MMLTF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs AIAGF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while AIAGF trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CSCCF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CSCCF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is -34.07. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs SFRRF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while SFRRF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CAMLF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 439.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CAMLF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs ACMDY Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 398.45M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ACMDY trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs ASCUF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 213.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ASCUF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs ARREF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 202.76M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ARREF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs AMRZF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.76M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and AMRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs HLGVF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 142.05M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs LSANF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 121.69M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while LSANF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CPPKF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 117.05M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CPPKF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CPFXF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 97.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CPFXF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs HDRSF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 50.00M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while HDRSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs HHLKF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 48.51M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while HHLKF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and HHLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs EMTRF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 44.91M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while EMTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CCOXF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.85M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and CCOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs NEVDF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.17M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs ATCUF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 29.98M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ATCUF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and ATCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs QCCUF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 22.39M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while QCCUF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs DRCMF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.62M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and DRCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs CPPMF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 16.26M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CPPMF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CPORF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and CPORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs RKCLF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.93M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and RKCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs AGLAF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.49M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs BZDLF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 8.75M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while BZDLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and BZDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs PNTZF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 8.55M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while PNTZF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs WCUFF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 7.02M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs SLMFF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 5.83M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while SLMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs USCUF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 4.53M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while USCUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs BCUFF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while BCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs CPCPF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CPCPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs ANGUF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.14M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and ANGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs CAEN Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.84M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while CAEN trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and CAEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs FVVSF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and FVVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs BRVRF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and BRVRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs INUMF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 727973.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while INUMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and INUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPMLF vs JUBAF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF is less volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPMLF.
IPMLF vs ECMXF Comparison
IPMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPMLF stands at 445.15M. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446859.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPMLF is priced at $2.75, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.28, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, IPMLF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPMLF and ECMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).