Imperium Technology Group Limited
Imperium Technology Group Limited IPGGF Peers
See (IPGGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPGGF | $0.23 | +0.88% | 85.81M | -11.49 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| HSHCY | $11.90 | -0.92% | 30.86B | 10.26 | $1.16 | +3.72% |
| HRSHF | $2.91 | -3.80% | 30.51B | 10.03 | $0.29 | +3.69% |
| QIHCF | $1.95 | N/A | 29.68B | 6.72 | $0.29 | +5.90% |
| RINIY | $12.00 | N/A | 8.44B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HWDJY | $52.56 | N/A | 7.20B | 22.56 | $2.33 | +2.07% |
| BVILY | $43.79 | +6.94% | 6.30B | 42.93 | $1.02 | +1.04% |
| HWDJF | $11.40 | N/A | 6.25B | 18.69 | $0.61 | +2.42% |
| SEBYF | $94.65 | +15.42% | 5.17B | 20.01 | $4.73 | N/A |
| HISEF | $3.10 | N/A | 4.85B | 8.86 | $0.35 | +4.83% |
Stock Comparison
IPGGF vs HSHCY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 30.86B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while HSHCY trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs HRSHF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 30.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while HRSHF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs QIHCF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 29.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and QIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs RINIY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while RINIY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs HWDJY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs BVILY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while BVILY trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs HWDJF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while HWDJF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and HWDJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs SEBYF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while SEBYF trades at $94.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and SEBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs HISEF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while HISEF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs RINIF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while RINIF trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs BVILF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while BVILF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and BVILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs ACKAY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while ACKAY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is -34.60. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ACKAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs MAWHY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while MAWHY trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to MAWHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs MAWHF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while MAWHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs ELUXY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while ELUXY trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -129.75. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and ELUXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs ELRXF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs RHUHF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while RHUHF trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and RHUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs JGLCF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.86M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs CFSKF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.43M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs RYLHF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.88M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and RYLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs SEBYY Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs VLBOF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 485.98M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and VLBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs WTWGF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 121.78M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while WTWGF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs WKGBF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and WKGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs VCCTF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 98.44M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while VCCTF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs DIIBF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 34.97M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while DIIBF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs RGBD Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.45M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while RGBD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs DGIX Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while DGIX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs LUVU Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.30M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while LUVU trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and LUVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs KMFI Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197266.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while KMFI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs ROWC Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 3985.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while ROWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ROWC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and ROWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs DIAAF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3692.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and DIAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs DEER Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3359.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while DEER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and DEER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs THBD Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1134.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while THBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and THBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs PWNX Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while PWNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PWNX's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGGF.
IPGGF vs VUOC Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while VUOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and VUOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs PFWIQ Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and PFWIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs FTDL Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while FTDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and FTDL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs AUVIQ Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467.00. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and AUVIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPGGF vs ICPBF Comparison
IPGGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGGF stands at 85.81M. In comparison, ICPBF has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, IPGGF is priced at $0.23, while ICPBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGGF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.49, whereas ICPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGGF's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ICPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPGGF and ICPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).