Inverite Insights Inc.
Inverite Insights Inc. (INVR.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INVR.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INVR.CN | CA$0.21 | +0.00% | 6.5M | -0.44 | -CA$0.48 | N/A |
| VISA.NE | CA$31.74 | +0.73% | 915.1B | 32.06 | CA$0.99 | +0.69% |
| MA.NE | CA$35.24 | +0.51% | 713.9B | 37.09 | CA$0.95 | +0.52% |
| PYPL.NE | CA$5.10 | +2.41% | 89.7B | 14.51 | CA$0.35 | N/A |
| GSY.TO | CA$186.00 | -0.26% | 3B | 12.22 | CA$15.22 | +2.82% |
| PRL.TO | CA$35.71 | -0.67% | 1.4B | 18.13 | CA$1.97 | +1.79% |
| ECN.TO | CA$3.11 | +0.97% | 875.4M | 51.83 | CA$0.06 | +1.29% |
| ECN-PC.TO | CA$23.00 | +0.00% | 867M | 4.56 | CA$5.05 | +1.29% |
| ACD.TO | CA$3.55 | -2.20% | 30.4M | -5.92 | -CA$0.60 | N/A |
| CHW.TO | CA$0.90 | +0.00% | 16.7M | -0.44 | -CA$2.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
INVR.CN vs VISA.NE Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, VISA.NE has a market cap of 915.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while VISA.NE trades at CA$31.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas VISA.NE's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to VISA.NE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to VISA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check VISA.NE's competition here
INVR.CN vs MA.NE Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MA.NE has a market cap of 713.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while MA.NE trades at CA$35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MA.NE's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to MA.NE's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to MA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check MA.NE's competition here
INVR.CN vs PYPL.NE Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PYPL.NE has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while PYPL.NE trades at CA$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PYPL.NE's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to PYPL.NE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to PYPL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check PYPL.NE's competition here
INVR.CN vs GSY.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, GSY.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while GSY.TO trades at CA$186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas GSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to GSY.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to GSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check GSY.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs PRL.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PRL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while PRL.TO trades at CA$35.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PRL.TO's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to PRL.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to PRL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check PRL.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs ECN.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ECN.TO has a market cap of 875.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while ECN.TO trades at CA$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ECN.TO's P/E ratio is 51.83. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to ECN.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to ECN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check ECN.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs ECN-PC.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ECN-PC.TO has a market cap of 867M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while ECN-PC.TO trades at CA$23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ECN-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to ECN-PC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to ECN-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check ECN-PC.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs ACD.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ACD.TO has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while ACD.TO trades at CA$3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ACD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to ACD.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to ACD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check ACD.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs CHW.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CHW.TO has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while CHW.TO trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CHW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to CHW.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is less volatile compared to CHW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check CHW.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs MRBL.CN Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MRBL.CN has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while MRBL.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MRBL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to MRBL.CN's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to MRBL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check MRBL.CN's competition here
INVR.CN vs XSF.CN Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, XSF.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while XSF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas XSF.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to XSF.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to XSF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check XSF.CN's competition here
INVR.CN vs CRWN.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CRWN.TO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while CRWN.TO trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CRWN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to CRWN.TO's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to CRWN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check CRWN.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs GWS.CN Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, GWS.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while GWS.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas GWS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to GWS.CN's ROE of +2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to GWS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check GWS.CN's competition here
INVR.CN vs PDFI.CN Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PDFI.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while PDFI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PDFI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to PDFI.CN's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to PDFI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check PDFI.CN's competition here
INVR.CN vs AXIS.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AXIS.TO has a market cap of 606.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while AXIS.TO trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AXIS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to AXIS.TO's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to AXIS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check AXIS.TO's competition here
INVR.CN vs PMTS.TO Comparison August 2025
INVR.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INVR.CN stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PMTS.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INVR.CN is priced at CA$0.21, while PMTS.TO trades at CA$34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INVR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PMTS.TO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, INVR.CN's ROE is +2.20%, compared to PMTS.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INVR.CN is more volatile compared to PMTS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INVR.CN.Check PMTS.TO's competition here