Infinitum Copper Corp.

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ANFGF trades at $27.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ANFGF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while FQVLF trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 67.80. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check FQVLF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while JIAXF trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check JIAXF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while LUNMF trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 87.14. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check LUNMF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while KGHPF trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check KGHPF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check OZMLF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while MMLTF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check MMLTF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CSCCF trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CSCCF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while AIAGY trades at $50.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check AIAGY's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while AIAGF trades at $87.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check AIAGF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while SFRRF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check SFRRF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 464.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while IPMLF trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check IPMLF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 357.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CAMLF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CAMLF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ASCUF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ASCUF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 255.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ARREF trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ARREF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CPPKF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CPPKF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check AMRZF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while LSANF trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check LSANF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check HLGVF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CPFXF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CPFXF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while HDRSF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check HDRSF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while HHLKF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check HHLKF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ATCUF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ATCUF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while EMTRF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check EMTRF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CPORF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CPORF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CCOXF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check NEVDF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CPPMF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CPPMF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check DRCMF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while BZDLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is less volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check BZDLF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while QCCUF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check QCCUF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check RKCLF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while USCUF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check USCUF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ACMDY trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ACMDY's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while PNTZF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check PNTZF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check AGLAF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while SLMFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is less volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check SLMFF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CPCPF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CPCPF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while BCUFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check BCUFF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check WCUFF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ANGUF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CAEN trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CAEN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is less volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CAEN's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check FVVSF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check BRVRF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check JUBAF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check ECMXF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, AEOMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to AEOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check AEOMF's competition here

INUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INUMF stands at 859K. In comparison, CROJF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INUMF is priced at $0.02, while CROJF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INUMF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, INUMF's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INUMF is more volatile compared to CROJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INUMF.Check CROJF's competition here