Sharc International Systems Inc.
Sharc International Systems Inc. (INTWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INTWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTWF | $0.07 | +0.00% | 12.1M | -3.70 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| KTWIY | $70.00 | +0.84% | 3.9B | 28.69 | $2.44 | N/A |
| UMICY | $3.99 | +3.87% | 3.9B | 28.64 | $0.14 | +3.66% |
| KTWIF | $34.60 | -11.17% | 3.8B | 28.36 | $1.22 | +1.81% |
| UMICF | $15.60 | -2.53% | 3.8B | 27.38 | $0.57 | +1.83% |
| MMNNF | $16.65 | +0.00% | 3B | 36.20 | $0.46 | +0.91% |
| ORGJF | $53.03 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 16.78 | $3.16 | +1.86% |
| CCVTF | $1.17 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 7.31 | $0.16 | +4.37% |
| HIZOF | $6.72 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 7.38 | $0.91 | +2.52% |
| TKUMF | $9.18 | +0.00% | 687.5M | 12.41 | $0.74 | +4.96% |
Stock Comparison
INTWF vs KTWIY Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KTWIY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while KTWIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas KTWIY's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to KTWIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to KTWIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check KTWIY's competition here
INTWF vs UMICY Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, UMICY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while UMICY trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas UMICY's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to UMICY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to UMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check UMICY's competition here
INTWF vs KTWIF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KTWIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while KTWIF trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas KTWIF's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to KTWIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to KTWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check KTWIF's competition here
INTWF vs UMICF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, UMICF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while UMICF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas UMICF's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to UMICF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to UMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check UMICF's competition here
INTWF vs MMNNF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MMNNF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while MMNNF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MMNNF's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to MMNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to MMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check MMNNF's competition here
INTWF vs ORGJF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ORGJF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ORGJF trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ORGJF's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ORGJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to ORGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ORGJF's competition here
INTWF vs CCVTF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CCVTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while CCVTF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CCVTF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to CCVTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to CCVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check CCVTF's competition here
INTWF vs HIZOF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HIZOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while HIZOF trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas HIZOF's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to HIZOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to HIZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check HIZOF's competition here
INTWF vs TKUMF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TKUMF has a market cap of 687.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while TKUMF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TKUMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to TKUMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to TKUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check TKUMF's competition here
INTWF vs MTWTF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MTWTF has a market cap of 537.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while MTWTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MTWTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to MTWTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to MTWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check MTWTF's competition here
INTWF vs PVARF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PVARF has a market cap of 460M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while PVARF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PVARF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to PVARF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to PVARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check PVARF's competition here
INTWF vs GRPRF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GRPRF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GRPRF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GRPRF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GRPRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to GRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GRPRF's competition here
INTWF vs ACTHF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ACTHF has a market cap of 148.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ACTHF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ACTHF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ACTHF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to ACTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ACTHF's competition here
INTWF vs SREMF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SREMF has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SREMF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SREMF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SREMF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to SREMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SREMF's competition here
INTWF vs MEEC Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MEEC has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while MEEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MEEC's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to MEEC's ROE of +3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to MEEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check MEEC's competition here
INTWF vs MGON Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MGON has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while MGON trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MGON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to MGON's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to MGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check MGON's competition here
INTWF vs SSHPF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SSHPF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SSHPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SSHPF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SSHPF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to SSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SSHPF's competition here
INTWF vs EMFGF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EMFGF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while EMFGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EMFGF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to EMFGF's ROE of +385.57%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to EMFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check EMFGF's competition here
INTWF vs PGTK Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PGTK has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while PGTK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PGTK's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to PGTK's ROE of +61.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to PGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check PGTK's competition here
INTWF vs GRNWF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GRNWF has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GRNWF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GRNWF's P/E ratio is -16.99. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GRNWF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to GRNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GRNWF's competition here
INTWF vs YEWTF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, YEWTF has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while YEWTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas YEWTF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to YEWTF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to YEWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check YEWTF's competition here
INTWF vs BIRMF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, BIRMF has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while BIRMF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas BIRMF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to BIRMF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to BIRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check BIRMF's competition here
INTWF vs TMGEF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TMGEF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while TMGEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TMGEF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to TMGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to TMGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check TMGEF's competition here
INTWF vs EESH Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EESH has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while EESH trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EESH's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to EESH's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to EESH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check EESH's competition here
INTWF vs AKCCF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AKCCF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while AKCCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AKCCF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to AKCCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to AKCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check AKCCF's competition here
INTWF vs DOCKF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DOCKF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while DOCKF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DOCKF's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to DOCKF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to DOCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check DOCKF's competition here
INTWF vs BNET Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, BNET has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while BNET trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas BNET's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to BNET's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to BNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check BNET's competition here
INTWF vs QUTIF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, QUTIF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while QUTIF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas QUTIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to QUTIF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to QUTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check QUTIF's competition here
INTWF vs DNDDF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DNDDF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while DNDDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DNDDF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to DNDDF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to DNDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check DNDDF's competition here
INTWF vs AETLF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AETLF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while AETLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AETLF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to AETLF's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to AETLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check AETLF's competition here
INTWF vs GOGR Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GOGR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GOGR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GOGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GOGR's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to GOGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GOGR's competition here
INTWF vs QWTR Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, QWTR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while QWTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas QWTR's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to QWTR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to QWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check QWTR's competition here
INTWF vs COSLF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, COSLF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while COSLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas COSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to COSLF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to COSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check COSLF's competition here
INTWF vs RAKR Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RAKR has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while RAKR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas RAKR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to RAKR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to RAKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check RAKR's competition here
INTWF vs DRFS Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DRFS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while DRFS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DRFS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to DRFS's ROE of +21.55%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to DRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check DRFS's competition here
INTWF vs SCAXF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SCAXF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SCAXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SCAXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SCAXF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to SCAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SCAXF's competition here
INTWF vs KNOS Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, KNOS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while KNOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas KNOS's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to KNOS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to KNOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check KNOS's competition here
INTWF vs DCTIF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, DCTIF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while DCTIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas DCTIF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to DCTIF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to DCTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check DCTIF's competition here
INTWF vs ENPRF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ENPRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ENPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ENPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ENPRF's ROE of -11.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to ENPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ENPRF's competition here
INTWF vs OWUV Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, OWUV has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while OWUV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas OWUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to OWUV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to OWUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check OWUV's competition here
INTWF vs ATMFF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ATMFF has a market cap of 898.7K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ATMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ATMFF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ATMFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to ATMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ATMFF's competition here
INTWF vs CGYV Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, CGYV has a market cap of 776.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while CGYV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas CGYV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to CGYV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to CGYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check CGYV's competition here
INTWF vs LQWC Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, LQWC has a market cap of 524.6K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while LQWC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas LQWC's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to LQWC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to LQWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check LQWC's competition here
INTWF vs ATGVF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ATGVF has a market cap of 508K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ATGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ATGVF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ATGVF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to ATGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ATGVF's competition here
INTWF vs TGTMF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TGTMF has a market cap of 463.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while TGTMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TGTMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to TGTMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to TGTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check TGTMF's competition here
INTWF vs SFBE Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SFBE has a market cap of 427.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SFBE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SFBE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SFBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to SFBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SFBE's competition here
INTWF vs GWTR Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GWTR has a market cap of 388.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GWTR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GWTR's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GWTR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to GWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GWTR's competition here
INTWF vs GMEV Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GMEV has a market cap of 270.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GMEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GMEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GMEV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to GMEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GMEV's competition here
INTWF vs TNKE Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, TNKE has a market cap of 265.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while TNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas TNKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to TNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to TNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check TNKE's competition here
INTWF vs EAWD Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EAWD has a market cap of 245.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while EAWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EAWD's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to EAWD's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to EAWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check EAWD's competition here
INTWF vs PCTL Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PCTL has a market cap of 80.6K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while PCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PCTL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to PCTL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to PCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check PCTL's competition here
INTWF vs ESFS Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ESFS has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ESFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ESFS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ESFS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to ESFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ESFS's competition here
INTWF vs WTII Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, WTII has a market cap of 61.6K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while WTII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas WTII's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to WTII's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to WTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check WTII's competition here
INTWF vs PURA Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, PURA has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while PURA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas PURA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to PURA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to PURA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check PURA's competition here
INTWF vs MSBN Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MSBN has a market cap of 53.2K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while MSBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MSBN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to MSBN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to MSBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check MSBN's competition here
INTWF vs GLEC Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GLEC has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GLEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GLEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GLEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to GLEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GLEC's competition here
INTWF vs AKMYF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, AKMYF has a market cap of 35.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while AKMYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas AKMYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to AKMYF's ROE of +2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to AKMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check AKMYF's competition here
INTWF vs XLPI Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, XLPI has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while XLPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas XLPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to XLPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to XLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check XLPI's competition here
INTWF vs ETII Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ETII has a market cap of 26.2K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ETII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ETII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ETII's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to ETII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ETII's competition here
INTWF vs WTNW Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, WTNW has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while WTNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas WTNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to WTNW's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to WTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check WTNW's competition here
INTWF vs SINX Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SINX has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SINX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SINX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SINX's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to SINX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SINX's competition here
INTWF vs GCHK Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GCHK has a market cap of 16.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GCHK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GCHK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to GCHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GCHK's competition here
INTWF vs UVFT Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, UVFT has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while UVFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas UVFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to UVFT's ROE of +1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to UVFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check UVFT's competition here
INTWF vs SMVS Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SMVS has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SMVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SMVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SMVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to SMVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SMVS's competition here
INTWF vs GRCO Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, GRCO has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while GRCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas GRCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to GRCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to GRCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check GRCO's competition here
INTWF vs ROBXF Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, ROBXF has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while ROBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas ROBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to ROBXF's ROE of +12.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to ROBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check ROBXF's competition here
INTWF vs SYEV Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, SYEV has a market cap of 5.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while SYEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas SYEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to SYEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to SYEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check SYEV's competition here
INTWF vs HTHL Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, HTHL has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while HTHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas HTHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to HTHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to HTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check HTHL's competition here
INTWF vs EMHI Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EMHI has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while EMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EMHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to EMHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to EMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check EMHI's competition here
INTWF vs RENO Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, RENO has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while RENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas RENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to RENO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to RENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check RENO's competition here
INTWF vs EAUI Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, EAUI has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while EAUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas EAUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to EAUI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to EAUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check EAUI's competition here
INTWF vs MPML Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, MPML has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while MPML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas MPML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to MPML's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is more volatile compared to MPML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check MPML's competition here
INTWF vs FQCC Comparison August 2025
INTWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTWF stands at 12.1M. In comparison, FQCC has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, INTWF is priced at $0.07, while FQCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTWF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.70, whereas FQCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTWF's ROE is -7.52%, compared to FQCC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INTWF is less volatile compared to FQCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTWF.Check FQCC's competition here