Intact Financial Corporation
Intact Financial Corporation (INTAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INTAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTAF | $14.25 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 1.61 | $8.87 | +4.77% |
| TKOMF | $41.96 | -3.45% | 80.7B | 11.40 | $3.68 | +2.66% |
| TKOMY | $41.86 | +1.75% | 80.6B | 11.37 | $3.68 | +1.68% |
| SMPNY | $15.43 | +1.51% | 57.2B | 18.39 | $0.84 | N/A |
| PINXY | $13.80 | +2.00% | 50.9B | 5.48 | $2.52 | +3.82% |
| PPCCY | $52.10 | -0.86% | 46.4B | 10.40 | $5.01 | +3.28% |
| PINXF | $0.76 | +0.00% | 46.3B | 5.84 | $0.13 | +4.45% |
| PPCCF | $1.99 | +5.29% | 44.3B | 9.95 | $0.20 | +3.76% |
| FRFFF | $18.32 | +0.52% | 42.3B | 0.18 | $99.31 | +4.94% |
| FAXXF | $17.80 | +0.00% | 42.1B | 0.18 | $99.31 | +6.49% |
Stock Comparison
INTAF vs TKOMF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while TKOMF trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and TKOMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKOMF's competition here
INTAF vs TKOMY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while TKOMY trades at $41.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check TKOMY's competition here
INTAF vs SMPNY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMPNY has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while SMPNY trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SMPNY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMPNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to SMPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check SMPNY's competition here
INTAF vs PINXY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while PINXY trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and PINXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PINXY's competition here
INTAF vs PPCCY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while PPCCY trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check PPCCY's competition here
INTAF vs PINXF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while PINXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check PINXF's competition here
INTAF vs PPCCF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while PPCCF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and PPCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPCCF's competition here
INTAF vs FRFFF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FRFFF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FRFFF's competition here
INTAF vs FAXXF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FAXXF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FAXXF's competition here
INTAF vs FRFHF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FRFHF has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FRFHF trades at $1,738.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FRFHF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRFHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FRFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FRFHF's competition here
INTAF vs IFTPF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and IFTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFTPF's competition here
INTAF vs INFFF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while INFFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and INFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INFFF's competition here
INTAF vs IFCZF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while IFCZF trades at $208.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check IFCZF's competition here
INTAF vs MSADF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MSADF has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while MSADF trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MSADF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSADF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to MSADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check MSADF's competition here
INTAF vs MSADY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while MSADY trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check MSADY's competition here
INTAF vs FRFXF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FRFXF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FRFXF's competition here
INTAF vs NHOLF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while NHOLF trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check NHOLF's competition here
INTAF vs QBIEY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while QBIEY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check QBIEY's competition here
INTAF vs QBEIF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while QBEIF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and QBEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBEIF's competition here
INTAF vs FRFGF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and FRFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRFGF's competition here
INTAF vs FXFLF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FXFLF's competition here
INTAF vs PWZYF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while PWZYF trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check PWZYF's competition here
INTAF vs SNMCY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while SNMCY trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check SNMCY's competition here
INTAF vs AMIGF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AMIGF trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AMIGF's competition here
INTAF vs AMIGY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AMIGY trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AMIGY's competition here
INTAF vs IAUGY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while IAUGY trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and IAUGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAUGY's competition here
INTAF vs IAUGF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while IAUGF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check IAUGF's competition here
INTAF vs SNMYF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while SNMYF trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check SNMYF's competition here
INTAF vs PZAKY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while PZAKY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check PZAKY's competition here
INTAF vs BZLYF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while BZLYF trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check BZLYF's competition here
INTAF vs DIISY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while DIISY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIISY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check DIISY's competition here
INTAF vs HCXLF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while HCXLF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and HCXLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCXLF's competition here
INTAF vs HCXLY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while HCXLY trades at $31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and HCXLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCXLY's competition here
INTAF vs IFZZF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and IFZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFZZF's competition here
INTAF vs QUCOF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while QUCOF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and QUCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QUCOF's competition here
INTAF vs ZZHGY Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while ZZHGY trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and ZZHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZZHGY's competition here
INTAF vs AFSIM Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFSIM trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFSIM's competition here
INTAF vs AFSIP Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFSIP trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFSIP's competition here
INTAF vs AFSIC Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFSIC trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFSIC's competition here
INTAF vs AFSIB Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFSIB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFSIB trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFSIB's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFSIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFSIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFSIB's competition here
INTAF vs AFSIN Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFSIN trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFSIN's competition here
INTAF vs AFSIA Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFSIA trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFSIA's competition here
INTAF vs ZZHGF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while ZZHGF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check ZZHGF's competition here
INTAF vs LNDAF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while LNDAF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and LNDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNDAF's competition here
INTAF vs FFHPF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and FFHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FFHPF's competition here
INTAF vs FXFHF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FXFHF's competition here
INTAF vs FAXRF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FAXRF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FAXRF's competition here
INTAF vs EGFHF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and EGFHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGFHF's competition here
INTAF vs FIGP Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FIGP trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIGP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check FIGP's competition here
INTAF vs SGYI Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while SGYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and SGYI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGYI's competition here
INTAF vs MAJCQ Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and MAJCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAJCQ's competition here
INTAF vs AFHIF Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFHIF's competition here
INTAF vs FNHCQ Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF and FNHCQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNHCQ's competition here
INTAF vs SBBG Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SBBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while SBBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check SBBG's competition here
INTAF vs AFHIQ Comparison August 2025
INTAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFHIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INTAF is priced at $14.25, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTAF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTAF is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTAF.Check AFHIQ's competition here