Instone Real Estate Group SE

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, DWNI.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while DWNI.DE trades at €18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas DWNI.DE's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DWNI.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is more volatile compared to DWNI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check DWNI.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, LHOG.F has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while LHOG.F trades at €0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas LHOG.F's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LHOG.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is more volatile compared to LHOG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check LHOG.F's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, 2PR4.SG has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while 2PR4.SG trades at €0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas 2PR4.SG's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2PR4.SG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is more volatile compared to 2PR4.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check 2PR4.SG's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, WCMK.DE has a market cap of 310M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while WCMK.DE trades at €2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas WCMK.DE's P/E ratio is -51.50. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WCMK.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is more volatile compared to WCMK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check WCMK.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, EV1.F has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while EV1.F trades at €0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas EV1.F's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EV1.F's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to EV1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check EV1.F's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, CC1.DE has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while CC1.DE trades at €0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas CC1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CC1.DE's ROE of +9.91%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to CC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check CC1.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, GTY.DE has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while GTY.DE trades at €0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas GTY.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTY.DE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to GTY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check GTY.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, GAG.DE has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while GAG.DE trades at €0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas GAG.DE's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GAG.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to GAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check GAG.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, OVZ1.F has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while OVZ1.F trades at €0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas OVZ1.F's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OVZ1.F's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to OVZ1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check OVZ1.F's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, RCMN.DE has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while RCMN.DE trades at €1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas RCMN.DE's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCMN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to RCMN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check RCMN.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, ERWE.DE has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while ERWE.DE trades at €0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas ERWE.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERWE.DE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is more volatile compared to ERWE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check ERWE.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, BNT1.DE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while BNT1.DE trades at €0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas BNT1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNT1.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to BNT1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check BNT1.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, NUVA.DE has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while NUVA.DE trades at €0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas NUVA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUVA.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is less volatile compared to NUVA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check NUVA.DE's competition here

INS.DE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INS.DE stands at 332.7M. In comparison, GIB.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INS.DE is priced at €7.68, while GIB.DE trades at €37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.46, whereas GIB.DE's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, INS.DE's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIB.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INS.DE is more volatile compared to GIB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.DE.Check GIB.DE's competition here