iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF INRA.AS Peers
See (INRA.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRA.AS | $18.65 | +4.48% | 2.07B | 16.36 | $1.14 | N/A |
ROBA.AS | $77.13 | +10.79% | 4.13B | 10.17 | $7.58 | N/A |
GOVH.PA | $46.29 | -0.11% | 3.64B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
GAHU.PA | $56.47 | -0.06% | 2.40B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
H2OA.AS | $23.44 | -0.32% | 2.01B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
EPRA.PA | $62.87 | -1.43% | 806.78M | 25.55 | $2.46 | N/A |
GOAI.PA | $98.48 | +1.69% | 792.19M | 33.35 | $2.95 | N/A |
LUXU.PA | $226.85 | +0.41% | 498.04M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
BLUE.PA | $15.88 | +0.24% | 462.96M | 15.82 | $1.00 | N/A |
GGOV.PA | $45.96 | -0.33% | 321.56M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
INRA.AS vs ROBA.AS Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, ROBA.AS has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while ROBA.AS trades at $77.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas ROBA.AS's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to ROBA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GOVH.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GOVH.PA has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GOVH.PA trades at $46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GOVH.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GOVH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GOVH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GAHU.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GAHU.PA has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GAHU.PA trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GAHU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GAHU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GAHU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs H2OA.AS Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, H2OA.AS has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while H2OA.AS trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas H2OA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to H2OA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to H2OA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs EPRA.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, EPRA.PA has a market cap of 806.78M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while EPRA.PA trades at $62.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas EPRA.PA's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to EPRA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to EPRA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GOAI.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GOAI.PA has a market cap of 792.19M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GOAI.PA trades at $98.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GOAI.PA's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GOAI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GOAI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs LUXU.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, LUXU.PA has a market cap of 498.04M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while LUXU.PA trades at $226.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas LUXU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to LUXU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to LUXU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs BLUE.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, BLUE.PA has a market cap of 462.96M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while BLUE.PA trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas BLUE.PA's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUE.PA's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to BLUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GGOV.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GGOV.PA has a market cap of 321.56M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GGOV.PA trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs MGT.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, MGT.PA has a market cap of 310.24M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while MGT.PA trades at $79.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas MGT.PA's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to MGT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to MGT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GAGU.AS Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GAGU.AS has a market cap of 189.73M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GAGU.AS trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GAGU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GAGU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GAGU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs EMBI.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, EMBI.PA has a market cap of 159.26M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while EMBI.PA trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas EMBI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to EMBI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to EMBI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GAGH.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GAGH.PA has a market cap of 63.50M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GAGH.PA trades at $48.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GAGH.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GAGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GAGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs ALHGO.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, ALHGO.PA has a market cap of 27.65M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while ALHGO.PA trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas ALHGO.PA's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALHGO.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to ALHGO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.
INRA.AS vs GINF.PA Comparison
INRA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INRA.AS stands at 2.07B. In comparison, GINF.PA has a market cap of 17.70M. Regarding current trading prices, INRA.AS is priced at $18.65, while GINF.PA trades at $75.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INRA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.36, whereas GINF.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INRA.AS's ROE is N/A, compared to GINF.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INRA.AS is more volatile compared to GINF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INRA.AS.