INEO Tech Corp.
INEO Tech Corp. (INEOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INEOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INEOF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 5.8M | -2.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| PGPEF | $109.96 | +0.00% | 27.6B | 13.87 | $7.93 | +3.61% |
| PUBGY | $22.90 | -3.09% | 23B | 11.58 | $1.98 | +3.30% |
| WPPGF | $5.88 | +3.74% | 6.3B | 8.78 | $0.67 | +8.57% |
| DNTUF | $22.79 | +17.66% | 5.9B | -4.56 | -$5.00 | +3.96% |
| DNTUY | $20.03 | -1.18% | 5.3B | -4.08 | -$4.96 | +3.22% |
| CYGIY | $5.25 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 37.50 | $0.14 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
| JCDXY | $8.87 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 12.49 | $0.71 | +3.51% |
| JCDXF | $17.25 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 12.15 | $1.42 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
INEOF vs PGPEF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PGPEF trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PGPEF's competition here
INEOF vs PUBGY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PUBGY trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PUBGY's competition here
INEOF vs WPPGF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while WPPGF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check WPPGF's competition here
INEOF vs DNTUF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while DNTUF trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check DNTUF's competition here
INEOF vs DNTUY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while DNTUY trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check DNTUY's competition here
INEOF vs CYGIY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CYGIY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CYGIY's competition here
INEOF vs CYAGF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CYAGF's competition here
INEOF vs JCDXY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check JCDXY's competition here
INEOF vs JCDXF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while JCDXF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check JCDXF's competition here
INEOF vs SOTDF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while SOTDF trades at $60.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check SOTDF's competition here
INEOF vs HKUOY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while HKUOY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check HKUOY's competition here
INEOF vs HKUOF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while HKUOF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check HKUOF's competition here
INEOF vs AIAPF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check AIAPF's competition here
INEOF vs FRRFF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check FRRFF's competition here
INEOF vs YUGVF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while YUGVF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 450.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check YUGVF's competition here
INEOF vs SPIDY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check SPIDY's competition here
INEOF vs NXFNF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check NXFNF's competition here
INEOF vs MCCLF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check MCCLF's competition here
INEOF vs TTTPF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check TTTPF's competition here
INEOF vs PROM Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PROM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PROM's competition here
INEOF vs PTMEY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PTMEY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PTMEY's competition here
INEOF vs SCPPF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 195.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while SCPPF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check SCPPF's competition here
INEOF vs CNFN Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CNFN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -27.87. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CNFN's competition here
INEOF vs KLTI Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check KLTI's competition here
INEOF vs VCCLF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check VCCLF's competition here
INEOF vs PCOFF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PCOFF's competition here
INEOF vs OPESF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check OPESF's competition here
INEOF vs GTNLF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check GTNLF's competition here
INEOF vs CAUUF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CAUUF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CAUUF's competition here
INEOF vs NHLPF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check NHLPF's competition here
INEOF vs EZOO Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check EZOO's competition here
INEOF vs IFUS Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while IFUS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check IFUS's competition here
INEOF vs ACHN Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ACHN's competition here
INEOF vs GMGZ Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while GMGZ trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check GMGZ's competition here
INEOF vs SNIPF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while SNIPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check SNIPF's competition here
INEOF vs AATV Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while AATV trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check AATV's competition here
INEOF vs TGNT Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while TGNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check TGNT's competition here
INEOF vs UCPA Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check UCPA's competition here
INEOF vs SPTY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while SPTY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check SPTY's competition here
INEOF vs VYBE Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check VYBE's competition here
INEOF vs MMDDF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check MMDDF's competition here
INEOF vs CMGR Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CMGR's competition here
INEOF vs DBMM Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check DBMM's competition here
INEOF vs FBOP Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check FBOP's competition here
INEOF vs MMND Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check MMND's competition here
INEOF vs CEENF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CEENF's competition here
INEOF vs ATXMF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 963.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ATXMF's competition here
INEOF vs BYOC Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 820K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check BYOC's competition here
INEOF vs LIGA Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 674.2K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while LIGA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check LIGA's competition here
INEOF vs PVSP Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 566.7K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PVSP's competition here
INEOF vs DMSL Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check DMSL's competition here
INEOF vs GOOLF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 342.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check GOOLF's competition here
INEOF vs CMGO Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 307.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CMGO's competition here
INEOF vs CYPXF Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 174K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CYPXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CYPXF's competition here
INEOF vs WWIO Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check WWIO's competition here
INEOF vs ACTL Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ACTL's competition here
INEOF vs GBXI Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check GBXI's competition here
INEOF vs NWCN Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 50.2K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check NWCN's competition here
INEOF vs NXMR Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check NXMR's competition here
INEOF vs TRBO Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check TRBO's competition here
INEOF vs SNPW Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 28.8K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while SNPW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check SNPW's competition here
INEOF vs ITKH Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ITKH's competition here
INEOF vs PRKI Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PRKI's competition here
INEOF vs NBDR Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check NBDR's competition here
INEOF vs EPGC Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check EPGC's competition here
INEOF vs RFII Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check RFII's competition here
INEOF vs PSYC Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check PSYC's competition here
INEOF vs CYGT Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check CYGT's competition here
INEOF vs BWAV Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check BWAV's competition here
INEOF vs ISML Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ISML's competition here
INEOF vs WGEE Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check WGEE's competition here
INEOF vs BXNG Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check BXNG's competition here
INEOF vs GTRL Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 230. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while GTRL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check GTRL's competition here
INEOF vs ADST Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ADST's competition here
INEOF vs LOGX Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check LOGX's competition here
INEOF vs VPSN Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check VPSN's competition here
INEOF vs MYRY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check MYRY's competition here
INEOF vs ADTY Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ADTY's competition here
INEOF vs ZULU Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is more volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check ZULU's competition here
INEOF vs LTMP Comparison July 2025
INEOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INEOF stands at 5.8M. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INEOF is priced at $0.04, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INEOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, INEOF's ROE is +2.87%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INEOF is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INEOF.Check LTMP's competition here