Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited
Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSILHYD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INDSILHYD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDSILHYD.BO | ₹35.82 | +6.42% | 995.5M | -8.78 | -₹4.08 | +1.40% |
| IGIL.NS | ₹322.05 | +0.53% | 139.2B | 27.18 | ₹11.85 | +2.47% |
| MIDWEST.BO | ₹4,445.15 | -5.00% | 49.1B | -296.94 | -₹14.97 | N/A |
| DECNGOLD.BO | ₹96.35 | +0.72% | 15.2B | -35.55 | -₹2.71 | N/A |
| NILE.BO | ₹1,670.70 | +8.05% | 5B | 9.98 | ₹167.45 | +0.30% |
| SERA.BO | ₹34.93 | +0.03% | 2.3B | 10.01 | ₹3.49 | N/A |
| COCHINM.BO | ₹218.90 | +2.63% | 1.7B | 11.65 | ₹18.79 | +3.65% |
| BAROEXT.BO | ₹8.36 | +2.20% | 1.4B | 5.57 | ₹1.50 | N/A |
| DCG.NS | ₹57.55 | +2.95% | 1B | 12.90 | ₹4.46 | N/A |
| VBCFERROQ.BO | ₹42.39 | +1.15% | 695M | -2.60 | -₹16.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
INDSILHYD.BO vs IGIL.NS Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, IGIL.NS has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while IGIL.NS trades at ₹322.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas IGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IGIL.NS's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to IGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check IGIL.NS's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs MIDWEST.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, MIDWEST.BO has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while MIDWEST.BO trades at ₹4,445.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas MIDWEST.BO's P/E ratio is -296.94. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MIDWEST.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to MIDWEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check MIDWEST.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs DECNGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, DECNGOLD.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while DECNGOLD.BO trades at ₹96.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas DECNGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is -35.55. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DECNGOLD.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to DECNGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check DECNGOLD.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs NILE.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, NILE.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while NILE.BO trades at ₹1,670.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas NILE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NILE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to NILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check NILE.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs SERA.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, SERA.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while SERA.BO trades at ₹34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas SERA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SERA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to SERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check SERA.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs COCHINM.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, COCHINM.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while COCHINM.BO trades at ₹218.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas COCHINM.BO's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COCHINM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to COCHINM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check COCHINM.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs BAROEXT.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, BAROEXT.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while BAROEXT.BO trades at ₹8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas BAROEXT.BO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BAROEXT.BO's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to BAROEXT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check BAROEXT.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs DCG.NS Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, DCG.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while DCG.NS trades at ₹57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas DCG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DCG.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to DCG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check DCG.NS's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs VBCFERROQ.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, VBCFERROQ.BO has a market cap of 695M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while VBCFERROQ.BO trades at ₹42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas VBCFERROQ.BO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VBCFERROQ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to VBCFERROQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check VBCFERROQ.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs FACORALL.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, FACORALL.BO has a market cap of 481M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while FACORALL.BO trades at ₹2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas FACORALL.BO's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FACORALL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to FACORALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check FACORALL.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs ZODJRDMKJ.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.BO has a market cap of 356.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while ZODJRDMKJ.BO trades at ₹32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.BO's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check ZODJRDMKJ.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs SOUTHMG.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, SOUTHMG.BO has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while SOUTHMG.BO trades at ₹69.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas SOUTHMG.BO's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SOUTHMG.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to SOUTHMG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check SOUTHMG.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs KACHCHH.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, KACHCHH.BO has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while KACHCHH.BO trades at ₹28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas KACHCHH.BO's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KACHCHH.BO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to KACHCHH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check KACHCHH.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs MONIND.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, MONIND.BO has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while MONIND.BO trades at ₹31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas MONIND.BO's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MONIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to MONIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check MONIND.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs SCBL.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, SCBL.BO has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while SCBL.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas SCBL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is more volatile compared to SCBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check SCBL.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs OMNIPOTENT.BO Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, OMNIPOTENT.BO has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while OMNIPOTENT.BO trades at ₹3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas OMNIPOTENT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OMNIPOTENT.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to OMNIPOTENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check OMNIPOTENT.BO's competition here
INDSILHYD.BO vs ABMINTLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
INDSILHYD.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDSILHYD.BO stands at 995.5M. In comparison, ABMINTLTD.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INDSILHYD.BO is priced at ₹35.82, while ABMINTLTD.NS trades at ₹129.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDSILHYD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.78, whereas ABMINTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, INDSILHYD.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ABMINTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDSILHYD.BO is less volatile compared to ABMINTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDSILHYD.BO.Check ABMINTLTD.NS's competition here