Inchcape plc

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, PDG.L has a market cap of 619.39M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while PDG.L trades at $35.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PDG.L's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to PDG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, LOOK.L has a market cap of 503.23M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while LOOK.L trades at $129.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas LOOK.L's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LOOK.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. INCH.L has daily volatility of 2.29 and LOOK.L has daily volatility of N/A.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, PINE.L has a market cap of 387.57M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while PINE.L trades at $385.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PINE.L's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PINE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to PINE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, VTU.L has a market cap of 205.09M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while VTU.L trades at $63.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas VTU.L's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VTU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is less volatile compared to VTU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, MOTR.L has a market cap of 118.87M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while MOTR.L trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MOTR.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOTR.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is less volatile compared to MOTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, 79GL.L has a market cap of 11.59M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while 79GL.L trades at $124.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas 79GL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 79GL.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to 79GL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, CFYN.L has a market cap of 11.59M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while CFYN.L trades at $425.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CFYN.L's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CFYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to CFYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, BARK.L has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while BARK.L trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BARK.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BARK.L's ROE of +3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to BARK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, 78GL.L has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while 78GL.L trades at $91.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas 78GL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 78GL.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to 78GL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.

INCH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INCH.L stands at 2.63B. In comparison, MMH.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, INCH.L is priced at $680.00, while MMH.L trades at $397.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INCH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MMH.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, INCH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MMH.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INCH.L is more volatile compared to MMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INCH.L.