iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INAA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INAA.L | £8,810.00 | +0.83% | 94.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.74% |
| IUSA.L | £4,729.50 | +0.80% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +100.90% |
| SSAC.L | £7,457.00 | +0.55% | 1.1T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SMEA.L | £7,573.00 | +0.22% | 979.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IITU.L | £2,826.00 | +1.07% | 935.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XESX.L | £4,938.75 | +0.41% | 856.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.64% |
| XESC.L | £8,135.50 | +0.41% | 856.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEUD.L | £23,005.00 | +0.15% | 795.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UB0D.L | £2,291.25 | -1.00% | 758.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.51% |
| CNAL.L | £12,132.00 | +0.17% | 685.1B | -11.34 | -£10.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
INAA.L vs IUSA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IUSA.L trades at £4,729.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IUSA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SSAC.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SSAC.L trades at £7,457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SSAC.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SMEA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 979.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SMEA.L trades at £7,573.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SMEA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IITU.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 935.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IITU.L trades at £2,826.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IITU.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XESX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 856.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XESX.L trades at £4,938.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XESX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XESC.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 856.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XESC.L trades at £8,135.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XESC.L's competition here
INAA.L vs MEUD.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 795.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while MEUD.L trades at £23,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check MEUD.L's competition here
INAA.L vs UB0D.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 758.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while UB0D.L trades at £2,291.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check UB0D.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CNAL.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 685.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CNAL.L trades at £12,132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CNAL.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IWRD.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 605.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IWRD.L trades at £6,534.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IWRD.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XDAX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 557.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XDAX.L trades at £19,849.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XDAX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XMMS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 556.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XMMS.L trades at £5,006.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XMMS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs MXWS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 521.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while MXWS.L trades at £9,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check MXWS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XMUS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 519.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XMUS.L trades at £14,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XMUS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs PHGP.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 504B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while PHGP.L trades at £23,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check PHGP.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XMEU.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 492.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XMEU.L trades at £8,646.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XMEU.L's competition here
INAA.L vs GLDA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 491.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while GLDA.L trades at £9,830.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check GLDA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs UC44.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 475.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while UC44.L trades at £13,323.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check UC44.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CS51.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 461.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CS51.L trades at £17,769.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CS51.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CS51.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IEEM.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 399.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IEEM.L trades at £3,660.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IEEM.L's competition here
INAA.L vs UB32.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 397.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while UB32.L trades at £9,366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check UB32.L's competition here
INAA.L vs EUE.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 395.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while EUE.L trades at £4,811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check EUE.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CACX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 354.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CACX.L trades at £6,919.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CACX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SEMA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 352.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SEMA.L trades at £3,456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SEMA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XSX6.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 335.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XSX6.L trades at £12,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XSX6.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IWFQ.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 317.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,542.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IWFQ.L's competition here
INAA.L vs GBSS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 299.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while GBSS.L trades at £22,724.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check GBSS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IWFV.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 281.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IWFV.L trades at £3,787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IWFV.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SGBX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 274.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SGBX.L trades at £23,725.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SGBX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CEA1.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 264.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CEA1.L trades at £15,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CEA1.L's competition here
INAA.L vs RBTX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while RBTX.L trades at £1,152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check RBTX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs ISPY.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while ISPY.L trades at £2,382.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check ISPY.L's competition here
INAA.L vs JRDE.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 246.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while JRDE.L trades at £3,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to JRDE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check JRDE.L's competition here
INAA.L vs JERE.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 243.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while JERE.L trades at £4,022.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check JERE.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CPJ1.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 242.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CPJ1.L trades at £15,822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CPJ1.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SUES.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 241.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SUES.L trades at £641.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUES.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SUES.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IWFM.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 231.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IWFM.L trades at £6,782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IWFM.L's competition here
INAA.L vs PHSP.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 221.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while PHSP.L trades at £2,600.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check PHSP.L's competition here
INAA.L vs HMEF.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 209.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while HMEF.L trades at £928.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check HMEF.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IUQF.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 200.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IUQF.L trades at £1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IUQF.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XXSC.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 197.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XXSC.L trades at £5,787.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XXSC.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SPGP.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 193.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SPGP.L trades at £1,827.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SPGP.L's competition here
INAA.L vs UIFS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 189.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while UIFS.L trades at £1,158.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check UIFS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XDEV.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 187.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XDEV.L trades at £3,898.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XDEV.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SOYU.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SOYU.L trades at £304.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SOYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SOYU.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CEUR.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 175.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CEUR.L trades at £32,032.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CEUR.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XDEQ.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,644.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XDEQ.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CU1.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 159B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CU1.L trades at £48,867.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CU1.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IEFV.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IEFV.L trades at £917.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IEFV.L's competition here
INAA.L vs PRIR.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while PRIR.L trades at £1,510.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check PRIR.L's competition here
INAA.L vs GBSP.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while GBSP.L trades at £1,714.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check GBSP.L's competition here
INAA.L vs WATL.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while WATL.L trades at £5,963.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check WATL.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IPRP.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IPRP.L trades at £2,686.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IPRP.L's competition here
INAA.L vs ISP6.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while ISP6.L trades at £6,757.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check ISP6.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CG1.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 140.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CG1.L trades at £37,592.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CG1.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XCX6.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XCX6.L trades at £1,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XCX6.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CUS1.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CUS1.L trades at £40,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CUS1.L's competition here
INAA.L vs UC79.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while UC79.L trades at £1,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check UC79.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CB5.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CB5.L trades at £4,178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CB5.L's competition here
INAA.L vs GILS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while GILS.L trades at £10,138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check GILS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XZEU.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XZEU.L trades at £2,892.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XZEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XZEU.L's competition here
INAA.L vs INFL.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while INFL.L trades at £10,165.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check INFL.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CSPX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CSPX.L trades at £680.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CSPX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs GSPX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, GSPX.L has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while GSPX.L trades at £10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to GSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check GSPX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SP5G.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SP5G.L trades at £216.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 67.42. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SP5G.L's competition here
INAA.L vs H50E.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while H50E.L trades at £5,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check H50E.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XDEM.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XDEM.L trades at £5,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XDEM.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IJPN.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IJPN.L trades at £1,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IJPN.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IGSG.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IGSG.L trades at £6,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IGSG.L's competition here
INAA.L vs 0GWB.IL Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while 0GWB.IL trades at £490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check 0GWB.IL's competition here
INAA.L vs XRSG.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XRSG.L trades at £24,595.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XRSG.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IWDG.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IWDG.L has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IWDG.L trades at £1,041.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IWDG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IWDG.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IWDA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IWDA.L trades at £120.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IWDA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IEUX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IEUX.L trades at £4,137.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IEUX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs JRDM.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while JRDM.L trades at £2,458.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check JRDM.L's competition here
INAA.L vs PRIC.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while PRIC.L trades at £1,670.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check PRIC.L's competition here
INAA.L vs DAXX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while DAXX.L trades at £19,362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check DAXX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs EQSG.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while EQSG.L trades at £5,408.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check EQSG.L's competition here
INAA.L vs WQDS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while WQDS.L trades at £571.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check WQDS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XLKQ.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XLKQ.L trades at £58,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XLKQ.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CSCA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CSCA.L trades at £17,893.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CSCA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs COMM.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while COMM.L trades at £550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check COMM.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IUKD.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IUKD.L trades at £855.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IUKD.L's competition here
INAA.L vs UB45.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while UB45.L trades at £6,351.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check UB45.L's competition here
INAA.L vs PRIJ.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,494.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check PRIJ.L's competition here
INAA.L vs MTIX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while MTIX.L trades at £14,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check MTIX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs RIEG.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while RIEG.L trades at £1,484.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check RIEG.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IGUS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IGUS.L trades at £14,568.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IGUS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IMV.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IMV.L trades at £5,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IMV.L's competition here
INAA.L vs EQDS.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while EQDS.L trades at £558.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check EQDS.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CSP1.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CSP1.L trades at £50,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L and CSP1.L have similar daily volatility (0.64).Check CSP1.L's competition here
INAA.L vs IDVY.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while IDVY.L trades at £1,950.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check IDVY.L's competition here
INAA.L vs XDN0.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while XDN0.L trades at £4,339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check XDN0.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SPEX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SPEX.L has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SPEX.L trades at £4,685.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPEX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SPEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SPEX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SPES.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SPES.L has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SPES.L trades at £4,411.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SPES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SPES.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CRPX.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CRPX.L trades at £13,421.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CRPX.L's competition here
INAA.L vs SWDA.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while SWDA.L trades at £8,992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check SWDA.L's competition here
INAA.L vs HMCH.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while HMCH.L trades at £602.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check HMCH.L's competition here
INAA.L vs CE71.L Comparison July 2025
INAA.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INAA.L stands at 94.3B. In comparison, CE71.L has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INAA.L is priced at £8,810.00, while CE71.L trades at £11,605.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INAA.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE71.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INAA.L's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE71.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INAA.L is more volatile compared to CE71.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INAA.L.Check CE71.L's competition here