InterMetro Communications, Inc.
InterMetro Communications, Inc. IMTO Peers
See (IMTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTO | $0.00 | N/A | 2.6M | -0.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AXTLF | $0.01 | -90.70% | 3.2T | -1.03 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $38.68 | +1.82% | 189.5B | 13.86 | $2.79 | +2.96% |
| DTEGY | $37.64 | -0.26% | 184.5B | 13.49 | $2.79 | +3.00% |
| TOWTF | $0.03 | +324900.00% | 168.3B | -0.81 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| NPPXF | $1.09 | +9.49% | 89.8B | 13.56 | $0.08 | +3.28% |
| NTTYY | $26.91 | +0.26% | 89.1B | 12.88 | $2.09 | +1.20% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.9B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.78% |
| SFTBF | $52.81 | -0.49% | 75.9B | 9.67 | $5.46 | +0.57% |
| SFTBY | $26.42 | -2.83% | 75.6B | 9.68 | $2.73 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
IMTO vs AXTLF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AXTLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs DTEGF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 189.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while DTEGF trades at $38.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs DTEGY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 184.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while DTEGY trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TOWTF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TOWTF has a market cap of 168.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TOWTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TOWTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TOWTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TOWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs NPPXF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while NPPXF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and NPPXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs NTTYY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while NTTYY trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs CUCSY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SFTBF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SFTBF trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SFTBY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SFTBY trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SFBQF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SFBQF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs AMXVF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs KDDIY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while KDDIY trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs AMOVF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs KDDIF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while KDDIF trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and KDDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs AARTY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs CLLNY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while CLLNY trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -472.75. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SGAPY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SGAPY trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SNGNF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SNGNF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs FNCTF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while FNCTF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs SCMWY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SCMWY trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and SCMWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TLGPY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLGPY trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TTRAF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TTRAF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TTRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs SWZCF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SWZCF trades at $600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs AVIKF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and AVIKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs CTOWY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and CTOWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TEFOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TEFOF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -45.60. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs AVIFY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AVIFY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs VODPF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while VODPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs CHWRF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while CHWRF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BTGOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BTGOF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TELNF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TELNF trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TELNY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TELNY trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs KKPNY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while KKPNY trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs KKPNF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while KKPNF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TLKMF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs AVIVF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs ELMUY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while ELMUY trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and ELMUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs HLTOY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while HLTOY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and HLTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TLSNY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLSNY trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs VDMCY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while VDMCY trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SJRWF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs RCIAF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while RCIAF trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs LBRDB Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while LBRDB trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs VODAF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while VODAF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs MTNOY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while MTNOY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TLSNF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLSNF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs MTNOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while MTNOF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs HKTTY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while HKTTY trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs BCPPF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TELDY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BCEPF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BCEPF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BECEF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and BECEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TLTZY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLTZY trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs FRTAY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while FRTAY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and FRTAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TIAIY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TIAIY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -25.42. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BCEXF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TIAOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -21.10. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TIAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs DIGBF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TIAJF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TIAJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs ELMUF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SHNUF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs SOBKY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SOBKY trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs HKTTF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while HKTTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and HKTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TELDF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TELDF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TELDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TLTZF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLTZF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs MYTEF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while MYTEF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and MYTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs HLTOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and HLTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs QBCRF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while QBCRF trades at $27.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs QBCAF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TCPFF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TCPFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs MAXSF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TRKNY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TRKNY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs PCCWY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while PCCWY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs PCWLF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while PCWLF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -66.02. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TKAGY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs PHTCF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and PHTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs AAFRF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs FRTAF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while FRTAF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and FRTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs GTMEY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs BZQIF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BZQIF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TCMFF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TCMFF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BZQIY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BZQIY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and BZQIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs AXXTF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while AXXTF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs CUCSF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs PTITF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while PTITF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and PTITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TFAOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs IIJIF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs UDIRF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while UDIRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -55.71. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and UDIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs IIJIY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while IIJIY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs MICCF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TACYY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs TRKNF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs TLGHY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs PTTWF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BGAOY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BGAOY trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs GMOYF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and GMOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IMTO vs SPKKY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while SPKKY trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs PTXKY Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while PTXKY trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMTO.
IMTO vs BGAOF Comparison
IMTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMTO stands at 2.6M. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMTO is priced at $0.00, while BGAOF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMTO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, IMTO's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMTO and BGAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).