Impelus Limited
Impelus Limited IMS.AX Peers
See (IMS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMS.AX | $0.01 | N/A | 0 | 0.24 | $0.03 | N/A |
| TLS.AX | $4.73 | -0.42% | 54.1B | 33.79 | $0.14 | +3.91% |
| TPG.AX | $5.18 | +0.39% | 9.6B | -86.33 | -$0.06 | +3.47% |
| SPK.AX | $2.06 | -0.48% | 3.9B | 12.88 | $0.16 | +11.91% |
| CNU.AX | $7.39 | -1.34% | 3.2B | -369.50 | -$0.02 | +6.37% |
| TUA.AX | $5.67 | -0.18% | 2.7B | 567.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| MAQ.AX | $58.82 | -3.75% | 1.5B | 41.42 | $1.42 | N/A |
| SLC.AX | $2.61 | -1.14% | 1.3B | -261.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ABB.AX | $4.04 | +0.50% | 1.2B | 40.40 | $0.10 | +1.39% |
| HTA.AX | $0.03 | +6.25% | 461.5M | -3.40 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IMS.AX vs TLS.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, TLS.AX has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while TLS.AX trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas TLS.AX's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLS.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to TLS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs TPG.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, TPG.AX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while TPG.AX trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas TPG.AX's P/E ratio is -86.33. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPG.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to TPG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs SPK.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, SPK.AX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SPK.AX trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas SPK.AX's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPK.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to SPK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs CNU.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, CNU.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CNU.AX trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas CNU.AX's P/E ratio is -369.50. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to CNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs TUA.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, TUA.AX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while TUA.AX trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas TUA.AX's P/E ratio is 567.00. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to TUA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs MAQ.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, MAQ.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MAQ.AX trades at $58.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas MAQ.AX's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAQ.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to MAQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs SLC.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, SLC.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SLC.AX trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas SLC.AX's P/E ratio is -261.00. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLC.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to SLC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs ABB.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, ABB.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ABB.AX trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas ABB.AX's P/E ratio is 40.40. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABB.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to ABB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs HTA.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, HTA.AX has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while HTA.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas HTA.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTA.AX's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to HTA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs ST1.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, ST1.AX has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ST1.AX trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas ST1.AX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ST1.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to ST1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs 5GN.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, 5GN.AX has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while 5GN.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas 5GN.AX's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5GN.AX's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to 5GN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs SWP.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, SWP.AX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SWP.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas SWP.AX's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWP.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to SWP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs VN8.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, VN8.AX has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while VN8.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas VN8.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VN8.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to VN8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs FSG.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, FSG.AX has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while FSG.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas FSG.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSG.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to FSG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs 5GG.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, 5GG.AX has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while 5GG.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas 5GG.AX's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5GG.AX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to 5GG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs SPA.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, SPA.AX has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SPA.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas SPA.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPA.AX's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to SPA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs NOR.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, NOR.AX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NOR.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas NOR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOR.AX's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to NOR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs FRX.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, FRX.AX has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while FRX.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas FRX.AX's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRX.AX's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to FRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.
IMS.AX vs HFY.AX Comparison
IMS.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMS.AX stands at 0. In comparison, HFY.AX has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while HFY.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 0.24, whereas HFY.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, IMS.AX's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFY.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMS.AX is more volatile compared to HFY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMS.AX.